Cargando…

Auditing Preparedness for Vector Control Field Studies

The value of baseline entomological data to any future area-wide release campaign relies on the application of consistent methods to produce results comparable across different times and places in a stepwise progression to larger releases. Traditionally, standard operating procedures (SOPs) and oper...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Collins, C. Matilda (Tilly), Quinlan, M. Megan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7124921/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31989920
http://dx.doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.19-0710
_version_ 1783515854779973632
author Collins, C. Matilda (Tilly)
Quinlan, M. Megan
author_facet Collins, C. Matilda (Tilly)
Quinlan, M. Megan
author_sort Collins, C. Matilda (Tilly)
collection PubMed
description The value of baseline entomological data to any future area-wide release campaign relies on the application of consistent methods to produce results comparable across different times and places in a stepwise progression to larger releases. Traditionally, standard operating procedures (SOPs) and operational plans support this consistency and, thus, the validity of emergent data. When release plans include transgenic mosquitoes for vector control or other novel beneficial insects, additional factors come into play such as biosafety permits, stakeholder acceptance, and ethics approval, which require even greater coordination and thoroughness. An audit approach was developed to verify the correct use of SOPs and appropriate performance of tasks during mosquito mark, release, recapture (MRR) studies. Audit questions matched SOPs, permit terms and conditions, and other key criteria, and can be used to support subsequent “spot check” verification by field teams. An external team of auditors, however, was found to be effective for initial checks in this example before the use of a transgenic strain of laboratory mosquitoes. We recommend similar approaches for field studies using release of novel beneficial insects, to ensure useful and valid data as an outcome and to support confidence in the rigor of the step-wise process.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7124921
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71249212020-04-05 Auditing Preparedness for Vector Control Field Studies Collins, C. Matilda (Tilly) Quinlan, M. Megan Am J Trop Med Hyg Perspective Piece The value of baseline entomological data to any future area-wide release campaign relies on the application of consistent methods to produce results comparable across different times and places in a stepwise progression to larger releases. Traditionally, standard operating procedures (SOPs) and operational plans support this consistency and, thus, the validity of emergent data. When release plans include transgenic mosquitoes for vector control or other novel beneficial insects, additional factors come into play such as biosafety permits, stakeholder acceptance, and ethics approval, which require even greater coordination and thoroughness. An audit approach was developed to verify the correct use of SOPs and appropriate performance of tasks during mosquito mark, release, recapture (MRR) studies. Audit questions matched SOPs, permit terms and conditions, and other key criteria, and can be used to support subsequent “spot check” verification by field teams. An external team of auditors, however, was found to be effective for initial checks in this example before the use of a transgenic strain of laboratory mosquitoes. We recommend similar approaches for field studies using release of novel beneficial insects, to ensure useful and valid data as an outcome and to support confidence in the rigor of the step-wise process. The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 2020-04 2020-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7124921/ /pubmed/31989920 http://dx.doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.19-0710 Text en © The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Perspective Piece
Collins, C. Matilda (Tilly)
Quinlan, M. Megan
Auditing Preparedness for Vector Control Field Studies
title Auditing Preparedness for Vector Control Field Studies
title_full Auditing Preparedness for Vector Control Field Studies
title_fullStr Auditing Preparedness for Vector Control Field Studies
title_full_unstemmed Auditing Preparedness for Vector Control Field Studies
title_short Auditing Preparedness for Vector Control Field Studies
title_sort auditing preparedness for vector control field studies
topic Perspective Piece
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7124921/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31989920
http://dx.doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.19-0710
work_keys_str_mv AT collinscmatildatilly auditingpreparednessforvectorcontrolfieldstudies
AT quinlanmmegan auditingpreparednessforvectorcontrolfieldstudies