Cargando…

A single-center, retrospective review of robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy with and without cryopreserved umbilical cord allograft in improving continence recovery

The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of cryopreserved umbilical cord (UC) allograft as a nerve wrap around the neurovascular bundle (NVB) in accelerating return to continence after radical prostatectomy. A single-center, retrospective study was performed on 200 pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ahmed, Mutahar, Esposito, Michael, Lovallo, Gregory
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer London 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7125058/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31152310
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11701-019-00972-9
_version_ 1783515866667679744
author Ahmed, Mutahar
Esposito, Michael
Lovallo, Gregory
author_facet Ahmed, Mutahar
Esposito, Michael
Lovallo, Gregory
author_sort Ahmed, Mutahar
collection PubMed
description The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of cryopreserved umbilical cord (UC) allograft as a nerve wrap around the neurovascular bundle (NVB) in accelerating return to continence after radical prostatectomy. A single-center, retrospective study was performed on 200 patients who underwent bilateral, nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) with and without placement of UC around the NVBs (n = 100/group). Patients were excluded if they had previous simple or transurethral prostatectomy or history of pelvic radiation. Post-operative continence, defined as 0 or 1 safety pad, was analyzed between groups at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. Complications, biochemical recurrence and adverse events were assessed to determine safety. Patients who underwent RARP with UC were significantly more likely to be continent at 1 month (65% vs. 44%, p = 0.018), 3 months (83% vs. 70%, p = 0.03), and 12 months (97% vs. 87%, p = 0.009). Sample stratification revealed that UC is beneficial for obese patients and those > 60 years, both of which are high risk for post-RARP incontinence. Biochemical failure was noted in 2 (UC) and 4 (control) patients. No adverse events or complications related to UC were observed. The results suggest that UC allograft is safe and accelerates continence recovery in post-RARP patients. Prospective, randomized trials are warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7125058
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer London
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71250582020-04-06 A single-center, retrospective review of robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy with and without cryopreserved umbilical cord allograft in improving continence recovery Ahmed, Mutahar Esposito, Michael Lovallo, Gregory J Robot Surg Original Article The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of cryopreserved umbilical cord (UC) allograft as a nerve wrap around the neurovascular bundle (NVB) in accelerating return to continence after radical prostatectomy. A single-center, retrospective study was performed on 200 patients who underwent bilateral, nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) with and without placement of UC around the NVBs (n = 100/group). Patients were excluded if they had previous simple or transurethral prostatectomy or history of pelvic radiation. Post-operative continence, defined as 0 or 1 safety pad, was analyzed between groups at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. Complications, biochemical recurrence and adverse events were assessed to determine safety. Patients who underwent RARP with UC were significantly more likely to be continent at 1 month (65% vs. 44%, p = 0.018), 3 months (83% vs. 70%, p = 0.03), and 12 months (97% vs. 87%, p = 0.009). Sample stratification revealed that UC is beneficial for obese patients and those > 60 years, both of which are high risk for post-RARP incontinence. Biochemical failure was noted in 2 (UC) and 4 (control) patients. No adverse events or complications related to UC were observed. The results suggest that UC allograft is safe and accelerates continence recovery in post-RARP patients. Prospective, randomized trials are warranted. Springer London 2019-05-31 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7125058/ /pubmed/31152310 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11701-019-00972-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ahmed, Mutahar
Esposito, Michael
Lovallo, Gregory
A single-center, retrospective review of robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy with and without cryopreserved umbilical cord allograft in improving continence recovery
title A single-center, retrospective review of robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy with and without cryopreserved umbilical cord allograft in improving continence recovery
title_full A single-center, retrospective review of robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy with and without cryopreserved umbilical cord allograft in improving continence recovery
title_fullStr A single-center, retrospective review of robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy with and without cryopreserved umbilical cord allograft in improving continence recovery
title_full_unstemmed A single-center, retrospective review of robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy with and without cryopreserved umbilical cord allograft in improving continence recovery
title_short A single-center, retrospective review of robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy with and without cryopreserved umbilical cord allograft in improving continence recovery
title_sort single-center, retrospective review of robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy with and without cryopreserved umbilical cord allograft in improving continence recovery
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7125058/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31152310
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11701-019-00972-9
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmedmutahar asinglecenterretrospectivereviewofrobotassistedlaparoscopicprostatectomywithandwithoutcryopreservedumbilicalcordallograftinimprovingcontinencerecovery
AT espositomichael asinglecenterretrospectivereviewofrobotassistedlaparoscopicprostatectomywithandwithoutcryopreservedumbilicalcordallograftinimprovingcontinencerecovery
AT lovallogregory asinglecenterretrospectivereviewofrobotassistedlaparoscopicprostatectomywithandwithoutcryopreservedumbilicalcordallograftinimprovingcontinencerecovery
AT ahmedmutahar singlecenterretrospectivereviewofrobotassistedlaparoscopicprostatectomywithandwithoutcryopreservedumbilicalcordallograftinimprovingcontinencerecovery
AT espositomichael singlecenterretrospectivereviewofrobotassistedlaparoscopicprostatectomywithandwithoutcryopreservedumbilicalcordallograftinimprovingcontinencerecovery
AT lovallogregory singlecenterretrospectivereviewofrobotassistedlaparoscopicprostatectomywithandwithoutcryopreservedumbilicalcordallograftinimprovingcontinencerecovery