Cargando…

Towards a catalogue of biodiversity databases: An ontological case study

Biodiversity informatics depends on digital access to credible information about species. Many online resources host species’ data, but the lack of categorisation for these resources inhibits the growth of this entire field. To explore possible solutions, we examined the (now retired) Biodiversity I...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Blair, Jarrett, Gwiazdowski, Rodger, Borrelli, Andrew, Hotchkiss, Michelle, Park, Candace, Perrett, Gleannan, Hanner, Robert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Pensoft Publishers 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7125240/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32269475
http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.8.e32765
_version_ 1783515909147590656
author Blair, Jarrett
Gwiazdowski, Rodger
Borrelli, Andrew
Hotchkiss, Michelle
Park, Candace
Perrett, Gleannan
Hanner, Robert
author_facet Blair, Jarrett
Gwiazdowski, Rodger
Borrelli, Andrew
Hotchkiss, Michelle
Park, Candace
Perrett, Gleannan
Hanner, Robert
author_sort Blair, Jarrett
collection PubMed
description Biodiversity informatics depends on digital access to credible information about species. Many online resources host species’ data, but the lack of categorisation for these resources inhibits the growth of this entire field. To explore possible solutions, we examined the (now retired) Biodiversity Information Projects of the World (BIPW) dataset created by the Biodiversity Information Standards (TDWG); this project, which ran from 2007-2015 (officially removed from the TDWG website in 2018) was an attempt at organising the Web's biodiversity databases into an indexed list. To do this, we applied a simple classification scheme to score databases within BIPW based on nine data categories, to characterise trends and current compositions of this biodiversity e-infrastructure. Primarily, we found that of 600 databases investigated from BIPW, only 315 (~53%) were accessible at the time of this writing, underscoring the precarious nature of the biodiversity information landscape. Many of these databases are still available, but suffer accessibility issues such as link rot, thus putting the information they contain in danger of being lost. We propose that a community-driven database of biodiversity databases with an accompanying ontology could facilitate efficient discovery of relevant biodiversity databases and support smaller databases – which have the greatest risk of being lost.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7125240
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Pensoft Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71252402020-04-08 Towards a catalogue of biodiversity databases: An ontological case study Blair, Jarrett Gwiazdowski, Rodger Borrelli, Andrew Hotchkiss, Michelle Park, Candace Perrett, Gleannan Hanner, Robert Biodivers Data J Commentary Biodiversity informatics depends on digital access to credible information about species. Many online resources host species’ data, but the lack of categorisation for these resources inhibits the growth of this entire field. To explore possible solutions, we examined the (now retired) Biodiversity Information Projects of the World (BIPW) dataset created by the Biodiversity Information Standards (TDWG); this project, which ran from 2007-2015 (officially removed from the TDWG website in 2018) was an attempt at organising the Web's biodiversity databases into an indexed list. To do this, we applied a simple classification scheme to score databases within BIPW based on nine data categories, to characterise trends and current compositions of this biodiversity e-infrastructure. Primarily, we found that of 600 databases investigated from BIPW, only 315 (~53%) were accessible at the time of this writing, underscoring the precarious nature of the biodiversity information landscape. Many of these databases are still available, but suffer accessibility issues such as link rot, thus putting the information they contain in danger of being lost. We propose that a community-driven database of biodiversity databases with an accompanying ontology could facilitate efficient discovery of relevant biodiversity databases and support smaller databases – which have the greatest risk of being lost. Pensoft Publishers 2020-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7125240/ /pubmed/32269475 http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.8.e32765 Text en Jarrett Blair, Rodger Gwiazdowski, Andrew Borrelli, Michelle Hotchkiss, Candace Park, Gleannan Perrett, Robert Hanner http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Commentary
Blair, Jarrett
Gwiazdowski, Rodger
Borrelli, Andrew
Hotchkiss, Michelle
Park, Candace
Perrett, Gleannan
Hanner, Robert
Towards a catalogue of biodiversity databases: An ontological case study
title Towards a catalogue of biodiversity databases: An ontological case study
title_full Towards a catalogue of biodiversity databases: An ontological case study
title_fullStr Towards a catalogue of biodiversity databases: An ontological case study
title_full_unstemmed Towards a catalogue of biodiversity databases: An ontological case study
title_short Towards a catalogue of biodiversity databases: An ontological case study
title_sort towards a catalogue of biodiversity databases: an ontological case study
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7125240/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32269475
http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.8.e32765
work_keys_str_mv AT blairjarrett towardsacatalogueofbiodiversitydatabasesanontologicalcasestudy
AT gwiazdowskirodger towardsacatalogueofbiodiversitydatabasesanontologicalcasestudy
AT borrelliandrew towardsacatalogueofbiodiversitydatabasesanontologicalcasestudy
AT hotchkissmichelle towardsacatalogueofbiodiversitydatabasesanontologicalcasestudy
AT parkcandace towardsacatalogueofbiodiversitydatabasesanontologicalcasestudy
AT perrettgleannan towardsacatalogueofbiodiversitydatabasesanontologicalcasestudy
AT hannerrobert towardsacatalogueofbiodiversitydatabasesanontologicalcasestudy