Cargando…
Towards a catalogue of biodiversity databases: An ontological case study
Biodiversity informatics depends on digital access to credible information about species. Many online resources host species’ data, but the lack of categorisation for these resources inhibits the growth of this entire field. To explore possible solutions, we examined the (now retired) Biodiversity I...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Pensoft Publishers
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7125240/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32269475 http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.8.e32765 |
_version_ | 1783515909147590656 |
---|---|
author | Blair, Jarrett Gwiazdowski, Rodger Borrelli, Andrew Hotchkiss, Michelle Park, Candace Perrett, Gleannan Hanner, Robert |
author_facet | Blair, Jarrett Gwiazdowski, Rodger Borrelli, Andrew Hotchkiss, Michelle Park, Candace Perrett, Gleannan Hanner, Robert |
author_sort | Blair, Jarrett |
collection | PubMed |
description | Biodiversity informatics depends on digital access to credible information about species. Many online resources host species’ data, but the lack of categorisation for these resources inhibits the growth of this entire field. To explore possible solutions, we examined the (now retired) Biodiversity Information Projects of the World (BIPW) dataset created by the Biodiversity Information Standards (TDWG); this project, which ran from 2007-2015 (officially removed from the TDWG website in 2018) was an attempt at organising the Web's biodiversity databases into an indexed list. To do this, we applied a simple classification scheme to score databases within BIPW based on nine data categories, to characterise trends and current compositions of this biodiversity e-infrastructure. Primarily, we found that of 600 databases investigated from BIPW, only 315 (~53%) were accessible at the time of this writing, underscoring the precarious nature of the biodiversity information landscape. Many of these databases are still available, but suffer accessibility issues such as link rot, thus putting the information they contain in danger of being lost. We propose that a community-driven database of biodiversity databases with an accompanying ontology could facilitate efficient discovery of relevant biodiversity databases and support smaller databases – which have the greatest risk of being lost. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7125240 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Pensoft Publishers |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71252402020-04-08 Towards a catalogue of biodiversity databases: An ontological case study Blair, Jarrett Gwiazdowski, Rodger Borrelli, Andrew Hotchkiss, Michelle Park, Candace Perrett, Gleannan Hanner, Robert Biodivers Data J Commentary Biodiversity informatics depends on digital access to credible information about species. Many online resources host species’ data, but the lack of categorisation for these resources inhibits the growth of this entire field. To explore possible solutions, we examined the (now retired) Biodiversity Information Projects of the World (BIPW) dataset created by the Biodiversity Information Standards (TDWG); this project, which ran from 2007-2015 (officially removed from the TDWG website in 2018) was an attempt at organising the Web's biodiversity databases into an indexed list. To do this, we applied a simple classification scheme to score databases within BIPW based on nine data categories, to characterise trends and current compositions of this biodiversity e-infrastructure. Primarily, we found that of 600 databases investigated from BIPW, only 315 (~53%) were accessible at the time of this writing, underscoring the precarious nature of the biodiversity information landscape. Many of these databases are still available, but suffer accessibility issues such as link rot, thus putting the information they contain in danger of being lost. We propose that a community-driven database of biodiversity databases with an accompanying ontology could facilitate efficient discovery of relevant biodiversity databases and support smaller databases – which have the greatest risk of being lost. Pensoft Publishers 2020-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7125240/ /pubmed/32269475 http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.8.e32765 Text en Jarrett Blair, Rodger Gwiazdowski, Andrew Borrelli, Michelle Hotchkiss, Candace Park, Gleannan Perrett, Robert Hanner http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Commentary Blair, Jarrett Gwiazdowski, Rodger Borrelli, Andrew Hotchkiss, Michelle Park, Candace Perrett, Gleannan Hanner, Robert Towards a catalogue of biodiversity databases: An ontological case study |
title | Towards a catalogue of biodiversity databases: An ontological case study |
title_full | Towards a catalogue of biodiversity databases: An ontological case study |
title_fullStr | Towards a catalogue of biodiversity databases: An ontological case study |
title_full_unstemmed | Towards a catalogue of biodiversity databases: An ontological case study |
title_short | Towards a catalogue of biodiversity databases: An ontological case study |
title_sort | towards a catalogue of biodiversity databases: an ontological case study |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7125240/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32269475 http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.8.e32765 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT blairjarrett towardsacatalogueofbiodiversitydatabasesanontologicalcasestudy AT gwiazdowskirodger towardsacatalogueofbiodiversitydatabasesanontologicalcasestudy AT borrelliandrew towardsacatalogueofbiodiversitydatabasesanontologicalcasestudy AT hotchkissmichelle towardsacatalogueofbiodiversitydatabasesanontologicalcasestudy AT parkcandace towardsacatalogueofbiodiversitydatabasesanontologicalcasestudy AT perrettgleannan towardsacatalogueofbiodiversitydatabasesanontologicalcasestudy AT hannerrobert towardsacatalogueofbiodiversitydatabasesanontologicalcasestudy |