Cargando…

The SAMPL6 challenge on predicting octanol–water partition coefficients from EC-RISM theory

Results are reported for octanol–water partition coefficients (log P) of the neutral states of drug-like molecules provided during the SAMPL6 (Statistical Assessment of Modeling of Proteins and Ligands) blind prediction challenge from applying the “embedded cluster reference interaction site model”...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tielker, Nicolas, Tomazic, Daniel, Eberlein, Lukas, Güssregen, Stefan, Kast, Stefan M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7125249/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31981015
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10822-020-00283-4
_version_ 1783515911270957056
author Tielker, Nicolas
Tomazic, Daniel
Eberlein, Lukas
Güssregen, Stefan
Kast, Stefan M.
author_facet Tielker, Nicolas
Tomazic, Daniel
Eberlein, Lukas
Güssregen, Stefan
Kast, Stefan M.
author_sort Tielker, Nicolas
collection PubMed
description Results are reported for octanol–water partition coefficients (log P) of the neutral states of drug-like molecules provided during the SAMPL6 (Statistical Assessment of Modeling of Proteins and Ligands) blind prediction challenge from applying the “embedded cluster reference interaction site model” (EC-RISM) as a solvation model for quantum-chemical calculations. Following the strategy outlined during earlier SAMPL challenges we first train 1- and 2-parameter water-free (“dry”) and water-saturated (“wet”) models for n-octanol solvation Gibbs energies with respect to experimental values from the “Minnesota Solvation Database” (MNSOL), yielding a root mean square error (RMSE) of 1.5 kcal mol(−1) for the best-performing 2-parameter wet model, while the optimal water model developed for the pK(a) part of the SAMPL6 challenge is kept unchanged (RMSE 1.6 kcal mol(−1) for neutral compounds from a model trained on both neutral and ionic species). Applying these models to the blind prediction set yields a log P RMSE of less than 0.5 for our best model (2-parameters, wet). Further analysis of our results reveals that a single compound is responsible for most of the error, SM15, without which the RMSE drops to 0.2. Since this is the only compound in the challenge dataset with a hydroxyl group we investigate other alcohols for which Gibbs energy of solvation data for both water and n-octanol are available in the MNSOL database to demonstrate a systematic cause of error and to discuss strategies for improvement. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10822-020-00283-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7125249
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71252492020-04-06 The SAMPL6 challenge on predicting octanol–water partition coefficients from EC-RISM theory Tielker, Nicolas Tomazic, Daniel Eberlein, Lukas Güssregen, Stefan Kast, Stefan M. J Comput Aided Mol Des Article Results are reported for octanol–water partition coefficients (log P) of the neutral states of drug-like molecules provided during the SAMPL6 (Statistical Assessment of Modeling of Proteins and Ligands) blind prediction challenge from applying the “embedded cluster reference interaction site model” (EC-RISM) as a solvation model for quantum-chemical calculations. Following the strategy outlined during earlier SAMPL challenges we first train 1- and 2-parameter water-free (“dry”) and water-saturated (“wet”) models for n-octanol solvation Gibbs energies with respect to experimental values from the “Minnesota Solvation Database” (MNSOL), yielding a root mean square error (RMSE) of 1.5 kcal mol(−1) for the best-performing 2-parameter wet model, while the optimal water model developed for the pK(a) part of the SAMPL6 challenge is kept unchanged (RMSE 1.6 kcal mol(−1) for neutral compounds from a model trained on both neutral and ionic species). Applying these models to the blind prediction set yields a log P RMSE of less than 0.5 for our best model (2-parameters, wet). Further analysis of our results reveals that a single compound is responsible for most of the error, SM15, without which the RMSE drops to 0.2. Since this is the only compound in the challenge dataset with a hydroxyl group we investigate other alcohols for which Gibbs energy of solvation data for both water and n-octanol are available in the MNSOL database to demonstrate a systematic cause of error and to discuss strategies for improvement. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10822-020-00283-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2020-01-24 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7125249/ /pubmed/31981015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10822-020-00283-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Tielker, Nicolas
Tomazic, Daniel
Eberlein, Lukas
Güssregen, Stefan
Kast, Stefan M.
The SAMPL6 challenge on predicting octanol–water partition coefficients from EC-RISM theory
title The SAMPL6 challenge on predicting octanol–water partition coefficients from EC-RISM theory
title_full The SAMPL6 challenge on predicting octanol–water partition coefficients from EC-RISM theory
title_fullStr The SAMPL6 challenge on predicting octanol–water partition coefficients from EC-RISM theory
title_full_unstemmed The SAMPL6 challenge on predicting octanol–water partition coefficients from EC-RISM theory
title_short The SAMPL6 challenge on predicting octanol–water partition coefficients from EC-RISM theory
title_sort sampl6 challenge on predicting octanol–water partition coefficients from ec-rism theory
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7125249/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31981015
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10822-020-00283-4
work_keys_str_mv AT tielkernicolas thesampl6challengeonpredictingoctanolwaterpartitioncoefficientsfromecrismtheory
AT tomazicdaniel thesampl6challengeonpredictingoctanolwaterpartitioncoefficientsfromecrismtheory
AT eberleinlukas thesampl6challengeonpredictingoctanolwaterpartitioncoefficientsfromecrismtheory
AT gussregenstefan thesampl6challengeonpredictingoctanolwaterpartitioncoefficientsfromecrismtheory
AT kaststefanm thesampl6challengeonpredictingoctanolwaterpartitioncoefficientsfromecrismtheory
AT tielkernicolas sampl6challengeonpredictingoctanolwaterpartitioncoefficientsfromecrismtheory
AT tomazicdaniel sampl6challengeonpredictingoctanolwaterpartitioncoefficientsfromecrismtheory
AT eberleinlukas sampl6challengeonpredictingoctanolwaterpartitioncoefficientsfromecrismtheory
AT gussregenstefan sampl6challengeonpredictingoctanolwaterpartitioncoefficientsfromecrismtheory
AT kaststefanm sampl6challengeonpredictingoctanolwaterpartitioncoefficientsfromecrismtheory