Cargando…
The SAMPL6 challenge on predicting octanol–water partition coefficients from EC-RISM theory
Results are reported for octanol–water partition coefficients (log P) of the neutral states of drug-like molecules provided during the SAMPL6 (Statistical Assessment of Modeling of Proteins and Ligands) blind prediction challenge from applying the “embedded cluster reference interaction site model”...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7125249/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31981015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10822-020-00283-4 |
_version_ | 1783515911270957056 |
---|---|
author | Tielker, Nicolas Tomazic, Daniel Eberlein, Lukas Güssregen, Stefan Kast, Stefan M. |
author_facet | Tielker, Nicolas Tomazic, Daniel Eberlein, Lukas Güssregen, Stefan Kast, Stefan M. |
author_sort | Tielker, Nicolas |
collection | PubMed |
description | Results are reported for octanol–water partition coefficients (log P) of the neutral states of drug-like molecules provided during the SAMPL6 (Statistical Assessment of Modeling of Proteins and Ligands) blind prediction challenge from applying the “embedded cluster reference interaction site model” (EC-RISM) as a solvation model for quantum-chemical calculations. Following the strategy outlined during earlier SAMPL challenges we first train 1- and 2-parameter water-free (“dry”) and water-saturated (“wet”) models for n-octanol solvation Gibbs energies with respect to experimental values from the “Minnesota Solvation Database” (MNSOL), yielding a root mean square error (RMSE) of 1.5 kcal mol(−1) for the best-performing 2-parameter wet model, while the optimal water model developed for the pK(a) part of the SAMPL6 challenge is kept unchanged (RMSE 1.6 kcal mol(−1) for neutral compounds from a model trained on both neutral and ionic species). Applying these models to the blind prediction set yields a log P RMSE of less than 0.5 for our best model (2-parameters, wet). Further analysis of our results reveals that a single compound is responsible for most of the error, SM15, without which the RMSE drops to 0.2. Since this is the only compound in the challenge dataset with a hydroxyl group we investigate other alcohols for which Gibbs energy of solvation data for both water and n-octanol are available in the MNSOL database to demonstrate a systematic cause of error and to discuss strategies for improvement. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10822-020-00283-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7125249 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71252492020-04-06 The SAMPL6 challenge on predicting octanol–water partition coefficients from EC-RISM theory Tielker, Nicolas Tomazic, Daniel Eberlein, Lukas Güssregen, Stefan Kast, Stefan M. J Comput Aided Mol Des Article Results are reported for octanol–water partition coefficients (log P) of the neutral states of drug-like molecules provided during the SAMPL6 (Statistical Assessment of Modeling of Proteins and Ligands) blind prediction challenge from applying the “embedded cluster reference interaction site model” (EC-RISM) as a solvation model for quantum-chemical calculations. Following the strategy outlined during earlier SAMPL challenges we first train 1- and 2-parameter water-free (“dry”) and water-saturated (“wet”) models for n-octanol solvation Gibbs energies with respect to experimental values from the “Minnesota Solvation Database” (MNSOL), yielding a root mean square error (RMSE) of 1.5 kcal mol(−1) for the best-performing 2-parameter wet model, while the optimal water model developed for the pK(a) part of the SAMPL6 challenge is kept unchanged (RMSE 1.6 kcal mol(−1) for neutral compounds from a model trained on both neutral and ionic species). Applying these models to the blind prediction set yields a log P RMSE of less than 0.5 for our best model (2-parameters, wet). Further analysis of our results reveals that a single compound is responsible for most of the error, SM15, without which the RMSE drops to 0.2. Since this is the only compound in the challenge dataset with a hydroxyl group we investigate other alcohols for which Gibbs energy of solvation data for both water and n-octanol are available in the MNSOL database to demonstrate a systematic cause of error and to discuss strategies for improvement. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10822-020-00283-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2020-01-24 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7125249/ /pubmed/31981015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10822-020-00283-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Tielker, Nicolas Tomazic, Daniel Eberlein, Lukas Güssregen, Stefan Kast, Stefan M. The SAMPL6 challenge on predicting octanol–water partition coefficients from EC-RISM theory |
title | The SAMPL6 challenge on predicting octanol–water partition coefficients from EC-RISM theory |
title_full | The SAMPL6 challenge on predicting octanol–water partition coefficients from EC-RISM theory |
title_fullStr | The SAMPL6 challenge on predicting octanol–water partition coefficients from EC-RISM theory |
title_full_unstemmed | The SAMPL6 challenge on predicting octanol–water partition coefficients from EC-RISM theory |
title_short | The SAMPL6 challenge on predicting octanol–water partition coefficients from EC-RISM theory |
title_sort | sampl6 challenge on predicting octanol–water partition coefficients from ec-rism theory |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7125249/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31981015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10822-020-00283-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tielkernicolas thesampl6challengeonpredictingoctanolwaterpartitioncoefficientsfromecrismtheory AT tomazicdaniel thesampl6challengeonpredictingoctanolwaterpartitioncoefficientsfromecrismtheory AT eberleinlukas thesampl6challengeonpredictingoctanolwaterpartitioncoefficientsfromecrismtheory AT gussregenstefan thesampl6challengeonpredictingoctanolwaterpartitioncoefficientsfromecrismtheory AT kaststefanm thesampl6challengeonpredictingoctanolwaterpartitioncoefficientsfromecrismtheory AT tielkernicolas sampl6challengeonpredictingoctanolwaterpartitioncoefficientsfromecrismtheory AT tomazicdaniel sampl6challengeonpredictingoctanolwaterpartitioncoefficientsfromecrismtheory AT eberleinlukas sampl6challengeonpredictingoctanolwaterpartitioncoefficientsfromecrismtheory AT gussregenstefan sampl6challengeonpredictingoctanolwaterpartitioncoefficientsfromecrismtheory AT kaststefanm sampl6challengeonpredictingoctanolwaterpartitioncoefficientsfromecrismtheory |