Cargando…
Mendel’s laws, Mendelian randomization and causal inference in observational data: substantive and nomenclatural issues
We respond to criticisms of Mendelian randomization (MR) by Mukamal, Stampfer and Rimm (MSR). MSR consider that MR is receiving too much attention and should be renamed. We explain how MR links to Mendel’s laws, the origin of the name and our lack of concern regarding nomenclature. We address MSR’s...
Autores principales: | Davey Smith, George, Holmes, Michael V., Davies, Neil M., Ebrahim, Shah |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7125255/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32207040 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10654-020-00622-7 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Mendel’s Law Demonstrated
Publicado: (1915) -
Mendelian Randomisation and Causal Inference in Observational Epidemiology
por: Sheehan, Nuala A, et al.
Publicado: (2008) -
Why didn't Darwin discover Mendel's laws?
por: Howard, Jonathan C
Publicado: (2009) -
Mendelian randomization: genetic anchors for causal inference in epidemiological studies
por: Davey Smith, George, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Use of Mendelian Randomization to Examine Causal Inference in Osteoporosis
por: Zheng, Jie, et al.
Publicado: (2019)