Cargando…
Consensus about image quality assessment criteria of breast implants mammography using Delphi method with radiographers and radiologists
AIMS: To identify image quality criteria that can be applied to assess breast implant (BI) mammograms according to radiologists and radiographers’ perspectives and to explore the level of agreement about criteria priority. METHODS: A two-round Delphi method using a questionnaire was applied to ident...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7125279/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32246276 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-020-00860-z |
_version_ | 1783515913855696896 |
---|---|
author | Sá dos Reis, Cláudia Gremion, Isabelle Richli Meystre, Nicole |
author_facet | Sá dos Reis, Cláudia Gremion, Isabelle Richli Meystre, Nicole |
author_sort | Sá dos Reis, Cláudia |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: To identify image quality criteria that can be applied to assess breast implant (BI) mammograms according to radiologists and radiographers’ perspectives and to explore the level of agreement about criteria priority. METHODS: A two-round Delphi method using a questionnaire was applied to identify the level of agreement between experts, asking them to rank each image criteria available for mammography according to 4 possible answers (1 = need to have, 2 = nice to have, 3 = not pertinent/appropriate, 4 = do not know). Criteria for craniocaudal (CC), mediolateral-oblique (MLO) and lateral (ML), with and without Eklund manoeuvre, were included. This process was repeated after removing the less relevant criteria. RESULTS: Between first and second rounds, different results were obtained regarding the criteria to assess CC and MLO images. Details for anatomic areas were considered the most relevant by radiographers during the first round, while general criteria were prioritised during the second round. Radiologists focused more on analysis of the spread of the breast tissue, if the breast was aligned with detector’s centre and level of contrast. The analysis of implant flow, the BI anterior edge and the maximum retropulsion of BI when Eklund manoeuvre is performed were the specific aspects of BI imaging considered as relevant for assessment. CONCLUSIONS: The importance of each criterion used to assess BI mammograms was not the same between radiographers and radiologists, suggesting the two groups of experts are looking for different requirements from the image. Further education and training is necessary to align strategies for assessing BI mammograms, and some criteria need to be adapted to reduce subjectivity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7125279 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71252792020-04-08 Consensus about image quality assessment criteria of breast implants mammography using Delphi method with radiographers and radiologists Sá dos Reis, Cláudia Gremion, Isabelle Richli Meystre, Nicole Insights Imaging Original Article AIMS: To identify image quality criteria that can be applied to assess breast implant (BI) mammograms according to radiologists and radiographers’ perspectives and to explore the level of agreement about criteria priority. METHODS: A two-round Delphi method using a questionnaire was applied to identify the level of agreement between experts, asking them to rank each image criteria available for mammography according to 4 possible answers (1 = need to have, 2 = nice to have, 3 = not pertinent/appropriate, 4 = do not know). Criteria for craniocaudal (CC), mediolateral-oblique (MLO) and lateral (ML), with and without Eklund manoeuvre, were included. This process was repeated after removing the less relevant criteria. RESULTS: Between first and second rounds, different results were obtained regarding the criteria to assess CC and MLO images. Details for anatomic areas were considered the most relevant by radiographers during the first round, while general criteria were prioritised during the second round. Radiologists focused more on analysis of the spread of the breast tissue, if the breast was aligned with detector’s centre and level of contrast. The analysis of implant flow, the BI anterior edge and the maximum retropulsion of BI when Eklund manoeuvre is performed were the specific aspects of BI imaging considered as relevant for assessment. CONCLUSIONS: The importance of each criterion used to assess BI mammograms was not the same between radiographers and radiologists, suggesting the two groups of experts are looking for different requirements from the image. Further education and training is necessary to align strategies for assessing BI mammograms, and some criteria need to be adapted to reduce subjectivity. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-04-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7125279/ /pubmed/32246276 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-020-00860-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Sá dos Reis, Cláudia Gremion, Isabelle Richli Meystre, Nicole Consensus about image quality assessment criteria of breast implants mammography using Delphi method with radiographers and radiologists |
title | Consensus about image quality assessment criteria of breast implants mammography using Delphi method with radiographers and radiologists |
title_full | Consensus about image quality assessment criteria of breast implants mammography using Delphi method with radiographers and radiologists |
title_fullStr | Consensus about image quality assessment criteria of breast implants mammography using Delphi method with radiographers and radiologists |
title_full_unstemmed | Consensus about image quality assessment criteria of breast implants mammography using Delphi method with radiographers and radiologists |
title_short | Consensus about image quality assessment criteria of breast implants mammography using Delphi method with radiographers and radiologists |
title_sort | consensus about image quality assessment criteria of breast implants mammography using delphi method with radiographers and radiologists |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7125279/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32246276 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-020-00860-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sadosreisclaudia consensusaboutimagequalityassessmentcriteriaofbreastimplantsmammographyusingdelphimethodwithradiographersandradiologists AT gremionisabelle consensusaboutimagequalityassessmentcriteriaofbreastimplantsmammographyusingdelphimethodwithradiographersandradiologists AT richlimeystrenicole consensusaboutimagequalityassessmentcriteriaofbreastimplantsmammographyusingdelphimethodwithradiographersandradiologists |