Cargando…

Electroretinogram Changes Following Sequential Panretinal Photocoagulation for Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy

PURPOSE: To evaluate changes in electroretinogram (ERG) response over the course of multiple sessions of panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PRP). METHODS: A prospective cohort study of 11 patients with PDR who required PRP was conducted. PRP was co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khojasteh, Hassan, Amini Vishte, Rasoul, Mirzajani, Ali, Khalili Pour, Elias, Bazvand, Fatemeh, Riazi-Esfahani, Hamid, Mirghorbani, Masoud, Modjtahedi, Bobeck S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7125331/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32280191
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S248678
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: To evaluate changes in electroretinogram (ERG) response over the course of multiple sessions of panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PRP). METHODS: A prospective cohort study of 11 patients with PDR who required PRP was conducted. PRP was completed over three sessions. Each patient had five ERGs done: baseline, 1 week after each PRP session, and 6 weeks after the last session of PRP. Dark-adapted 0.01 ERG, Dark-adapted 3 ERG, Dark-adapted 10 ERG, Light- adapted 3 ERG, and Light-adapted 30 Hz flicker ERG were done. The mean change in a- and b-wave amplitudes as well as implicit times compared to baseline was analyzed. RESULTS: A significant reduction in peak amplitudes of both a- and b-waves and delay in latencies were observed in all responses (p<0.05). The absolute amplitude reduction and delay in latency were higher for scotopic b-waves (p<0.05). The root mean square (RMS) of Dark-adapted 10.0 ERG (p<0.05) and total mean amplitude changes of a- and b-waves (p<0.001) were reduced after each laser session; however, the magnitude of change was not different between the first, second, or third sessions of PRP, and each session showed a similar deterioration rate of ERG parameters comparing to each other (p=0.4 for RMS and p=0.2 for total mean amplitude changes). In addition, the results indicated recovery of the amplitude and latency of ERG waves after 6 weeks from the final treatment (p<0.001) although not to baseline levels. CONCLUSION: ERG findings following PRP show reduced retinal function after each session which partially recovers by 6 weeks after the completion of therapy. Clinicians should be mindful of these changes when planning the treatment course for patients with PDR.