Cargando…
Characteristics, results, and reporting of contemporary surgical trials: A systematic review and analysis
INTRODUCTION: The complexities and risks inherent to the field of surgery and surgical interventions present unique challenges to the design and analysis of surgical randomized controlled trials (RCT). Prior studies have investigated the practical and methodologic challenges posed by surgical RCTs....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7125342/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32258836 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isjp.2020.03.002 |
_version_ | 1783515924822753280 |
---|---|
author | Bryce Robinson, N. Naik, Ajita Hameed, Irbaz Ruan, Yongle Rahouma, Mohamed Weidenmann, Viola Zenati, Marco A. Bhatt, Deepak L. Girardi, Leonard N. Kurlansky, Paul Raja, Shahzad G. Moher, David Fremes, Stephen Chikwe, Joanna Gaudino, Mario |
author_facet | Bryce Robinson, N. Naik, Ajita Hameed, Irbaz Ruan, Yongle Rahouma, Mohamed Weidenmann, Viola Zenati, Marco A. Bhatt, Deepak L. Girardi, Leonard N. Kurlansky, Paul Raja, Shahzad G. Moher, David Fremes, Stephen Chikwe, Joanna Gaudino, Mario |
author_sort | Bryce Robinson, N. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The complexities and risks inherent to the field of surgery and surgical interventions present unique challenges to the design and analysis of surgical randomized controlled trials (RCT). Prior studies have investigated the practical and methodologic challenges posed by surgical RCTs. To date, however, a comprehensive analysis of the contemporary literature across multiple surgical subspecialties does not exist. In this descriptive analysis, we set out to characterize surgical RCTs over the past 10 years across six major surgical specialties. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A literature search by a medical librarian will be performed to identify all surgical randomized clinical trials published between January 2009 and December 2019 in the two journals with the highest impact factor for six surgical specialties as well as two large general medicine journals. Two reviewers will independently screen the citations retrieved from the literature search and extract data according to a previously described protocol via a pre-defined data collection form. Categorical variables will be reported as counts and percentages. Following assessment of normality, continuous variables will be reported as mean (standard deviation) or median (inter-quartile range). Based on normality of data, independent t-test or the Mann-Whitney U test will be used to compare continuous variables and chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests to compare categorical variables. Comparisons across multiple sets will be performed using ANOVA or Kruskak-Wallis tests. Two-sided significance testing will be used and a p-value <0.05 will be considered significant without adjustment for multiple testing. All analyses will be performed using SPSS version 24 and R within RStudio. PROSPERO (ID number: 162797). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: There are no ethical concerns directly pertinent to this systematic review. The retrieved data will be made available upon request. The study will be written in English and submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7125342 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71253422020-04-06 Characteristics, results, and reporting of contemporary surgical trials: A systematic review and analysis Bryce Robinson, N. Naik, Ajita Hameed, Irbaz Ruan, Yongle Rahouma, Mohamed Weidenmann, Viola Zenati, Marco A. Bhatt, Deepak L. Girardi, Leonard N. Kurlansky, Paul Raja, Shahzad G. Moher, David Fremes, Stephen Chikwe, Joanna Gaudino, Mario Int J Surg Protoc Research Paper INTRODUCTION: The complexities and risks inherent to the field of surgery and surgical interventions present unique challenges to the design and analysis of surgical randomized controlled trials (RCT). Prior studies have investigated the practical and methodologic challenges posed by surgical RCTs. To date, however, a comprehensive analysis of the contemporary literature across multiple surgical subspecialties does not exist. In this descriptive analysis, we set out to characterize surgical RCTs over the past 10 years across six major surgical specialties. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A literature search by a medical librarian will be performed to identify all surgical randomized clinical trials published between January 2009 and December 2019 in the two journals with the highest impact factor for six surgical specialties as well as two large general medicine journals. Two reviewers will independently screen the citations retrieved from the literature search and extract data according to a previously described protocol via a pre-defined data collection form. Categorical variables will be reported as counts and percentages. Following assessment of normality, continuous variables will be reported as mean (standard deviation) or median (inter-quartile range). Based on normality of data, independent t-test or the Mann-Whitney U test will be used to compare continuous variables and chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests to compare categorical variables. Comparisons across multiple sets will be performed using ANOVA or Kruskak-Wallis tests. Two-sided significance testing will be used and a p-value <0.05 will be considered significant without adjustment for multiple testing. All analyses will be performed using SPSS version 24 and R within RStudio. PROSPERO (ID number: 162797). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: There are no ethical concerns directly pertinent to this systematic review. The retrieved data will be made available upon request. The study will be written in English and submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. Elsevier 2020-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7125342/ /pubmed/32258836 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isjp.2020.03.002 Text en © 2020 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Bryce Robinson, N. Naik, Ajita Hameed, Irbaz Ruan, Yongle Rahouma, Mohamed Weidenmann, Viola Zenati, Marco A. Bhatt, Deepak L. Girardi, Leonard N. Kurlansky, Paul Raja, Shahzad G. Moher, David Fremes, Stephen Chikwe, Joanna Gaudino, Mario Characteristics, results, and reporting of contemporary surgical trials: A systematic review and analysis |
title | Characteristics, results, and reporting of contemporary surgical trials: A systematic review and analysis |
title_full | Characteristics, results, and reporting of contemporary surgical trials: A systematic review and analysis |
title_fullStr | Characteristics, results, and reporting of contemporary surgical trials: A systematic review and analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Characteristics, results, and reporting of contemporary surgical trials: A systematic review and analysis |
title_short | Characteristics, results, and reporting of contemporary surgical trials: A systematic review and analysis |
title_sort | characteristics, results, and reporting of contemporary surgical trials: a systematic review and analysis |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7125342/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32258836 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isjp.2020.03.002 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brycerobinsonn characteristicsresultsandreportingofcontemporarysurgicaltrialsasystematicreviewandanalysis AT naikajita characteristicsresultsandreportingofcontemporarysurgicaltrialsasystematicreviewandanalysis AT hameedirbaz characteristicsresultsandreportingofcontemporarysurgicaltrialsasystematicreviewandanalysis AT ruanyongle characteristicsresultsandreportingofcontemporarysurgicaltrialsasystematicreviewandanalysis AT rahoumamohamed characteristicsresultsandreportingofcontemporarysurgicaltrialsasystematicreviewandanalysis AT weidenmannviola characteristicsresultsandreportingofcontemporarysurgicaltrialsasystematicreviewandanalysis AT zenatimarcoa characteristicsresultsandreportingofcontemporarysurgicaltrialsasystematicreviewandanalysis AT bhattdeepakl characteristicsresultsandreportingofcontemporarysurgicaltrialsasystematicreviewandanalysis AT girardileonardn characteristicsresultsandreportingofcontemporarysurgicaltrialsasystematicreviewandanalysis AT kurlanskypaul characteristicsresultsandreportingofcontemporarysurgicaltrialsasystematicreviewandanalysis AT rajashahzadg characteristicsresultsandreportingofcontemporarysurgicaltrialsasystematicreviewandanalysis AT moherdavid characteristicsresultsandreportingofcontemporarysurgicaltrialsasystematicreviewandanalysis AT fremesstephen characteristicsresultsandreportingofcontemporarysurgicaltrialsasystematicreviewandanalysis AT chikwejoanna characteristicsresultsandreportingofcontemporarysurgicaltrialsasystematicreviewandanalysis AT gaudinomario characteristicsresultsandreportingofcontemporarysurgicaltrialsasystematicreviewandanalysis |