Cargando…

Prospective Comparison of Transient Elastography Using Two Different Devices: Performance of FibroScan and FibroTouch

PURPOSE: Transient elastography (TE) using FibroScan (FS) has been established to non-invasively assess liver fibrosis and steatosis. The aim of this study was to compare the recently introduced FibroTouch (FT) device with the established FS with respect to liver stiffness and CAP. PATIENTS AND METH...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Serra, Joao Tiago, Mueller, Johannes, Teng, Haidong, Elshaarawy, Omar, Mueller, Sebastian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7125402/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32280285
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/HMER.S245455
_version_ 1783515936534298624
author Serra, Joao Tiago
Mueller, Johannes
Teng, Haidong
Elshaarawy, Omar
Mueller, Sebastian
author_facet Serra, Joao Tiago
Mueller, Johannes
Teng, Haidong
Elshaarawy, Omar
Mueller, Sebastian
author_sort Serra, Joao Tiago
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Transient elastography (TE) using FibroScan (FS) has been established to non-invasively assess liver fibrosis and steatosis. The aim of this study was to compare the recently introduced FibroTouch (FT) device with the established FS with respect to liver stiffness and CAP. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-nine patients with and without liver disease were included. All patients were measured three times with FS (FibroScan 530 compact, Echosens, France) and FT (FibroTouch-FT100, Wuxi Hisky Med, China). For FS, M and XL probe were used according to the manufacturer’s specifications. For steatosis, CAP and the comparable FT equivalent UAP (ultrasound attenuation parameter) was determined. Finally, FT and FS were explored in liver tissue-mimicking phantoms. RESULTS: LS between FS and FT correlated well with r=0.91. Root-mean-square (RMS) of the coefficient of variation for LS was better in FS (11.1% vs 27.4%). Bland-Altman analysis showed a 3.1 kPa mean overestimation of LS by FT. In addition, UAP strongly and linearly depended on the BMI following UAP=3.02 × BMI+186. In phantoms, a similar relation was found with UAP (phantom)= 3.78 × BMI + 146 suggesting that UAP is directly calculated from entered BMI instead of assessing shear-wave attenuation. Consequently, RMS-CV was lower for FT (6.0% vs 9.7%). However, if using different BMI, CV-RMS for FT increased to 12.7%. LS of a patient with manifest liver cirrhosis and ascites was 38.8 kPa using the FS-XL probe but almost normal with FT (7.2 kPa). CONCLUSION: Although LS by FT shows good correlation with LS-FS, it has larger variation, continuously overestimates LS and completely fails in ascites. Moreover, FT-UAP seems to be a misleading parameter for steatosis assessment because it is at least in part calculated from mandatory entered patient data. In conclusion, novel LS cut-off values need to be defined for LS-FT and usage of UAP is not recommended.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7125402
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71254022020-04-10 Prospective Comparison of Transient Elastography Using Two Different Devices: Performance of FibroScan and FibroTouch Serra, Joao Tiago Mueller, Johannes Teng, Haidong Elshaarawy, Omar Mueller, Sebastian Hepat Med Original Research PURPOSE: Transient elastography (TE) using FibroScan (FS) has been established to non-invasively assess liver fibrosis and steatosis. The aim of this study was to compare the recently introduced FibroTouch (FT) device with the established FS with respect to liver stiffness and CAP. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-nine patients with and without liver disease were included. All patients were measured three times with FS (FibroScan 530 compact, Echosens, France) and FT (FibroTouch-FT100, Wuxi Hisky Med, China). For FS, M and XL probe were used according to the manufacturer’s specifications. For steatosis, CAP and the comparable FT equivalent UAP (ultrasound attenuation parameter) was determined. Finally, FT and FS were explored in liver tissue-mimicking phantoms. RESULTS: LS between FS and FT correlated well with r=0.91. Root-mean-square (RMS) of the coefficient of variation for LS was better in FS (11.1% vs 27.4%). Bland-Altman analysis showed a 3.1 kPa mean overestimation of LS by FT. In addition, UAP strongly and linearly depended on the BMI following UAP=3.02 × BMI+186. In phantoms, a similar relation was found with UAP (phantom)= 3.78 × BMI + 146 suggesting that UAP is directly calculated from entered BMI instead of assessing shear-wave attenuation. Consequently, RMS-CV was lower for FT (6.0% vs 9.7%). However, if using different BMI, CV-RMS for FT increased to 12.7%. LS of a patient with manifest liver cirrhosis and ascites was 38.8 kPa using the FS-XL probe but almost normal with FT (7.2 kPa). CONCLUSION: Although LS by FT shows good correlation with LS-FS, it has larger variation, continuously overestimates LS and completely fails in ascites. Moreover, FT-UAP seems to be a misleading parameter for steatosis assessment because it is at least in part calculated from mandatory entered patient data. In conclusion, novel LS cut-off values need to be defined for LS-FT and usage of UAP is not recommended. Dove 2020-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7125402/ /pubmed/32280285 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/HMER.S245455 Text en © 2020 Serra et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Serra, Joao Tiago
Mueller, Johannes
Teng, Haidong
Elshaarawy, Omar
Mueller, Sebastian
Prospective Comparison of Transient Elastography Using Two Different Devices: Performance of FibroScan and FibroTouch
title Prospective Comparison of Transient Elastography Using Two Different Devices: Performance of FibroScan and FibroTouch
title_full Prospective Comparison of Transient Elastography Using Two Different Devices: Performance of FibroScan and FibroTouch
title_fullStr Prospective Comparison of Transient Elastography Using Two Different Devices: Performance of FibroScan and FibroTouch
title_full_unstemmed Prospective Comparison of Transient Elastography Using Two Different Devices: Performance of FibroScan and FibroTouch
title_short Prospective Comparison of Transient Elastography Using Two Different Devices: Performance of FibroScan and FibroTouch
title_sort prospective comparison of transient elastography using two different devices: performance of fibroscan and fibrotouch
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7125402/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32280285
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/HMER.S245455
work_keys_str_mv AT serrajoaotiago prospectivecomparisonoftransientelastographyusingtwodifferentdevicesperformanceoffibroscanandfibrotouch
AT muellerjohannes prospectivecomparisonoftransientelastographyusingtwodifferentdevicesperformanceoffibroscanandfibrotouch
AT tenghaidong prospectivecomparisonoftransientelastographyusingtwodifferentdevicesperformanceoffibroscanandfibrotouch
AT elshaarawyomar prospectivecomparisonoftransientelastographyusingtwodifferentdevicesperformanceoffibroscanandfibrotouch
AT muellersebastian prospectivecomparisonoftransientelastographyusingtwodifferentdevicesperformanceoffibroscanandfibrotouch