Cargando…

Comparing Medium-Term Clinical Outcomes following XEN® 45 and XEN® 63 Device Implantation

PURPOSE: To evaluate medium-term clinical outcomes with XEN® 45 or XEN® 63 Gel Stent (Allergan, Dublin, Ireland) for treatment of primary open angle glaucoma (POAG). Materials and Methods. Retrospective, descriptive, and observational study involving 40 patients implanted with a XEN® 45 Gel Stent an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fernández-García, Aitor, Zhou, Ying, García-Alonso, Mercedes, Andrango, Henry D., Poyales, Francisco, Garzón, Nuria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7125472/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32280523
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/4796548
_version_ 1783515952267132928
author Fernández-García, Aitor
Zhou, Ying
García-Alonso, Mercedes
Andrango, Henry D.
Poyales, Francisco
Garzón, Nuria
author_facet Fernández-García, Aitor
Zhou, Ying
García-Alonso, Mercedes
Andrango, Henry D.
Poyales, Francisco
Garzón, Nuria
author_sort Fernández-García, Aitor
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate medium-term clinical outcomes with XEN® 45 or XEN® 63 Gel Stent (Allergan, Dublin, Ireland) for treatment of primary open angle glaucoma (POAG). Materials and Methods. Retrospective, descriptive, and observational study involving 40 patients implanted with a XEN® 45 Gel Stent and 34 implanted with a XEN® 63 Gel Stent who had undergone POAG surgery and had been followed up and controlled between 12 and 36 months. RESULTS: IOP dropped from 18.02 ± 5.23 mmHg preop to 13.81 ± 1.88, 14.80 ± 2.23, and 14.62 ± 1.90 at 1, 2, and 3 years after surgery (p < 0.001) consecutively with XEN® 45 and from 19.00 ± 6.11 mmHg preop to 15.47 ± 2.45, 14.66 ± 2.45, and 15.46 ± 2.48 at 1, 2, and 3 years after surgery (p < 0.001) with XEN® 63. The number of drugs used by patients to treat their glaucoma decreased after undergoing surgery in both groups. Within the XEN® 45 group, mean changes at 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years amounted to 70%, 74.3%, and 37.5%, respectively, whereas within the XEN® 63 group, the mean reduction was 75%, 79.8%, and 71.9%. When comparing the outcomes for two groups, the differences did not prove to be statistically significant. More than 90% of the procedures included in the study (using either gel-stent device) were completed without any noteworthy complications. CONCLUSION: POAG surgical procedures with either XEN® 45 or XEN® 63 Gel Stent implantation could be a safe and effective treatment approach.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7125472
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71254722020-04-10 Comparing Medium-Term Clinical Outcomes following XEN® 45 and XEN® 63 Device Implantation Fernández-García, Aitor Zhou, Ying García-Alonso, Mercedes Andrango, Henry D. Poyales, Francisco Garzón, Nuria J Ophthalmol Research Article PURPOSE: To evaluate medium-term clinical outcomes with XEN® 45 or XEN® 63 Gel Stent (Allergan, Dublin, Ireland) for treatment of primary open angle glaucoma (POAG). Materials and Methods. Retrospective, descriptive, and observational study involving 40 patients implanted with a XEN® 45 Gel Stent and 34 implanted with a XEN® 63 Gel Stent who had undergone POAG surgery and had been followed up and controlled between 12 and 36 months. RESULTS: IOP dropped from 18.02 ± 5.23 mmHg preop to 13.81 ± 1.88, 14.80 ± 2.23, and 14.62 ± 1.90 at 1, 2, and 3 years after surgery (p < 0.001) consecutively with XEN® 45 and from 19.00 ± 6.11 mmHg preop to 15.47 ± 2.45, 14.66 ± 2.45, and 15.46 ± 2.48 at 1, 2, and 3 years after surgery (p < 0.001) with XEN® 63. The number of drugs used by patients to treat their glaucoma decreased after undergoing surgery in both groups. Within the XEN® 45 group, mean changes at 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years amounted to 70%, 74.3%, and 37.5%, respectively, whereas within the XEN® 63 group, the mean reduction was 75%, 79.8%, and 71.9%. When comparing the outcomes for two groups, the differences did not prove to be statistically significant. More than 90% of the procedures included in the study (using either gel-stent device) were completed without any noteworthy complications. CONCLUSION: POAG surgical procedures with either XEN® 45 or XEN® 63 Gel Stent implantation could be a safe and effective treatment approach. Hindawi 2020-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7125472/ /pubmed/32280523 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/4796548 Text en Copyright © 2020 Aitor Fernández-García et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Fernández-García, Aitor
Zhou, Ying
García-Alonso, Mercedes
Andrango, Henry D.
Poyales, Francisco
Garzón, Nuria
Comparing Medium-Term Clinical Outcomes following XEN® 45 and XEN® 63 Device Implantation
title Comparing Medium-Term Clinical Outcomes following XEN® 45 and XEN® 63 Device Implantation
title_full Comparing Medium-Term Clinical Outcomes following XEN® 45 and XEN® 63 Device Implantation
title_fullStr Comparing Medium-Term Clinical Outcomes following XEN® 45 and XEN® 63 Device Implantation
title_full_unstemmed Comparing Medium-Term Clinical Outcomes following XEN® 45 and XEN® 63 Device Implantation
title_short Comparing Medium-Term Clinical Outcomes following XEN® 45 and XEN® 63 Device Implantation
title_sort comparing medium-term clinical outcomes following xen® 45 and xen® 63 device implantation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7125472/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32280523
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/4796548
work_keys_str_mv AT fernandezgarciaaitor comparingmediumtermclinicaloutcomesfollowingxen45andxen63deviceimplantation
AT zhouying comparingmediumtermclinicaloutcomesfollowingxen45andxen63deviceimplantation
AT garciaalonsomercedes comparingmediumtermclinicaloutcomesfollowingxen45andxen63deviceimplantation
AT andrangohenryd comparingmediumtermclinicaloutcomesfollowingxen45andxen63deviceimplantation
AT poyalesfrancisco comparingmediumtermclinicaloutcomesfollowingxen45andxen63deviceimplantation
AT garzonnuria comparingmediumtermclinicaloutcomesfollowingxen45andxen63deviceimplantation