Cargando…

Palliative Care Integration Project (PCIP) Quality Improvement Strategy Evaluation

This study evaluated the effectiveness of implementation of common assessment tools, collaborative care plans, and symptom management guidelines for cancer patients as a strategy to improve the quality, coordination, and integration of palliative care service across organizations and health care sec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dudgeon, Deborah J., Knott, Christine, Eichholz, Mary, Gerlach, Jacqueline Lochhaas, Chapman, Cheryl, Viola, Raymond, Van Dijk, Janice, Preston, Sharon, Batchelor, Diane, Bartfay, Emma
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee. Published by Elsevier Inc. 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7125855/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18358693
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.07.013
_version_ 1783516033651310592
author Dudgeon, Deborah J.
Knott, Christine
Eichholz, Mary
Gerlach, Jacqueline Lochhaas
Chapman, Cheryl
Viola, Raymond
Van Dijk, Janice
Preston, Sharon
Batchelor, Diane
Bartfay, Emma
author_facet Dudgeon, Deborah J.
Knott, Christine
Eichholz, Mary
Gerlach, Jacqueline Lochhaas
Chapman, Cheryl
Viola, Raymond
Van Dijk, Janice
Preston, Sharon
Batchelor, Diane
Bartfay, Emma
author_sort Dudgeon, Deborah J.
collection PubMed
description This study evaluated the effectiveness of implementation of common assessment tools, collaborative care plans, and symptom management guidelines for cancer patients as a strategy to improve the quality, coordination, and integration of palliative care service across organizations and health care sectors. A pre-post design to measure the impact on symptom management, caregiver burden and satisfaction with care delivery, and service utilization was used. Two cohorts of eligible patients and caregivers completed Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scales, Caregiver Reaction Assessment and FAMCARE Scales and chart audits were conducted. Administrative data from each participating site were examined for utilization trends. Audits of 53 charts preimplementation and 63 postimplementation showed an increase in documentation of pain from 24.5% to 74.6% (P < 0.001) of charts. Administrative data showed a decrease in the percentage of patients with at least one emergency room visit from 94.3% to 84.8% (P < 0.001), in the percentage of patients with at least one admission to the acute care hospital (P < 0.001), and deaths in acute care 43.1%–35.7% (P = 0.133). There was minimal change in the intensity of symptoms (P = 0.591), and no change in the burden on the caregiver (P = 0.086) or caregiver satisfaction with care (P = 0.942). This study showed that implementation of common assessment tools, collaborative care plans, and symptom management guidelines across health sectors can result in some increased documentation of symptoms and efficiencies in care. Future projects should consider imbedding a continuous quality improvement methodology and longer timelines into their projects to improve outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7125855
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee. Published by Elsevier Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71258552020-04-08 Palliative Care Integration Project (PCIP) Quality Improvement Strategy Evaluation Dudgeon, Deborah J. Knott, Christine Eichholz, Mary Gerlach, Jacqueline Lochhaas Chapman, Cheryl Viola, Raymond Van Dijk, Janice Preston, Sharon Batchelor, Diane Bartfay, Emma J Pain Symptom Manage Article This study evaluated the effectiveness of implementation of common assessment tools, collaborative care plans, and symptom management guidelines for cancer patients as a strategy to improve the quality, coordination, and integration of palliative care service across organizations and health care sectors. A pre-post design to measure the impact on symptom management, caregiver burden and satisfaction with care delivery, and service utilization was used. Two cohorts of eligible patients and caregivers completed Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scales, Caregiver Reaction Assessment and FAMCARE Scales and chart audits were conducted. Administrative data from each participating site were examined for utilization trends. Audits of 53 charts preimplementation and 63 postimplementation showed an increase in documentation of pain from 24.5% to 74.6% (P < 0.001) of charts. Administrative data showed a decrease in the percentage of patients with at least one emergency room visit from 94.3% to 84.8% (P < 0.001), in the percentage of patients with at least one admission to the acute care hospital (P < 0.001), and deaths in acute care 43.1%–35.7% (P = 0.133). There was minimal change in the intensity of symptoms (P = 0.591), and no change in the burden on the caregiver (P = 0.086) or caregiver satisfaction with care (P = 0.942). This study showed that implementation of common assessment tools, collaborative care plans, and symptom management guidelines across health sectors can result in some increased documentation of symptoms and efficiencies in care. Future projects should consider imbedding a continuous quality improvement methodology and longer timelines into their projects to improve outcomes. U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee. Published by Elsevier Inc. 2008-06 2008-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7125855/ /pubmed/18358693 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.07.013 Text en Copyright © 2008 U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Dudgeon, Deborah J.
Knott, Christine
Eichholz, Mary
Gerlach, Jacqueline Lochhaas
Chapman, Cheryl
Viola, Raymond
Van Dijk, Janice
Preston, Sharon
Batchelor, Diane
Bartfay, Emma
Palliative Care Integration Project (PCIP) Quality Improvement Strategy Evaluation
title Palliative Care Integration Project (PCIP) Quality Improvement Strategy Evaluation
title_full Palliative Care Integration Project (PCIP) Quality Improvement Strategy Evaluation
title_fullStr Palliative Care Integration Project (PCIP) Quality Improvement Strategy Evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Palliative Care Integration Project (PCIP) Quality Improvement Strategy Evaluation
title_short Palliative Care Integration Project (PCIP) Quality Improvement Strategy Evaluation
title_sort palliative care integration project (pcip) quality improvement strategy evaluation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7125855/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18358693
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.07.013
work_keys_str_mv AT dudgeondeborahj palliativecareintegrationprojectpcipqualityimprovementstrategyevaluation
AT knottchristine palliativecareintegrationprojectpcipqualityimprovementstrategyevaluation
AT eichholzmary palliativecareintegrationprojectpcipqualityimprovementstrategyevaluation
AT gerlachjacquelinelochhaas palliativecareintegrationprojectpcipqualityimprovementstrategyevaluation
AT chapmancheryl palliativecareintegrationprojectpcipqualityimprovementstrategyevaluation
AT violaraymond palliativecareintegrationprojectpcipqualityimprovementstrategyevaluation
AT vandijkjanice palliativecareintegrationprojectpcipqualityimprovementstrategyevaluation
AT prestonsharon palliativecareintegrationprojectpcipqualityimprovementstrategyevaluation
AT batchelordiane palliativecareintegrationprojectpcipqualityimprovementstrategyevaluation
AT bartfayemma palliativecareintegrationprojectpcipqualityimprovementstrategyevaluation