Cargando…

Zoonotic disease risk perceptions in the British veterinary profession

In human and veterinary medicine, reducing the risk of occupationally-acquired infections relies on effective infection prevention and control practices (IPCs). In veterinary medicine, zoonoses present a risk to practitioners, yet little is known about how these risks are understood and how this tra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Robin, Charlotte, Bettridge, Judy, McMaster, Fiona
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier B.V. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7126003/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28010906
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2016.11.015
_version_ 1783516063155093504
author Robin, Charlotte
Bettridge, Judy
McMaster, Fiona
author_facet Robin, Charlotte
Bettridge, Judy
McMaster, Fiona
author_sort Robin, Charlotte
collection PubMed
description In human and veterinary medicine, reducing the risk of occupationally-acquired infections relies on effective infection prevention and control practices (IPCs). In veterinary medicine, zoonoses present a risk to practitioners, yet little is known about how these risks are understood and how this translates into health protective behaviour. This study aimed to explore risk perceptions within the British veterinary profession and identify motivators and barriers to compliance with IPCs. A cross-sectional study was conducted using veterinary practices registered with the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons. Here we demonstrate that compliance with IPCs is influenced by more than just knowledge and experience, and understanding of risk is complex and multifactorial. Out of 252 respondents, the majority were not concerned about the risk of zoonoses (57.5%); however, a considerable proportion (34.9%) was. Overall, 44.0% of respondents reported contracting a confirmed or suspected zoonoses, most frequently dermatophytosis (58.6%). In veterinary professionals who had previous experience of managing zoonotic cases, time or financial constraints and a concern for adverse animal reactions were not perceived as barriers to use of personal protective equipment (PPE). For those working in large animal practice, the most significant motivator for using PPE was concerns over liability. When assessing responses to a range of different “infection control attitudes”, veterinary nurses tended to have a more positive perspective, compared with veterinary surgeons. Our results demonstrate that IPCs are not always adhered to, and factors influencing motivators and barriers to compliance are not simply based on knowledge and experience. Educating veterinary professionals may help improve compliance to a certain extent, however increased knowledge does not necessarily equate to an increase in risk-mitigating behaviour. This highlights that the construction of risk is complex and circumstance-specific and to get a real grasp on compliance with IPCs, this construction needs to be explored in more depth.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7126003
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Elsevier B.V.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71260032020-04-08 Zoonotic disease risk perceptions in the British veterinary profession Robin, Charlotte Bettridge, Judy McMaster, Fiona Prev Vet Med Article In human and veterinary medicine, reducing the risk of occupationally-acquired infections relies on effective infection prevention and control practices (IPCs). In veterinary medicine, zoonoses present a risk to practitioners, yet little is known about how these risks are understood and how this translates into health protective behaviour. This study aimed to explore risk perceptions within the British veterinary profession and identify motivators and barriers to compliance with IPCs. A cross-sectional study was conducted using veterinary practices registered with the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons. Here we demonstrate that compliance with IPCs is influenced by more than just knowledge and experience, and understanding of risk is complex and multifactorial. Out of 252 respondents, the majority were not concerned about the risk of zoonoses (57.5%); however, a considerable proportion (34.9%) was. Overall, 44.0% of respondents reported contracting a confirmed or suspected zoonoses, most frequently dermatophytosis (58.6%). In veterinary professionals who had previous experience of managing zoonotic cases, time or financial constraints and a concern for adverse animal reactions were not perceived as barriers to use of personal protective equipment (PPE). For those working in large animal practice, the most significant motivator for using PPE was concerns over liability. When assessing responses to a range of different “infection control attitudes”, veterinary nurses tended to have a more positive perspective, compared with veterinary surgeons. Our results demonstrate that IPCs are not always adhered to, and factors influencing motivators and barriers to compliance are not simply based on knowledge and experience. Educating veterinary professionals may help improve compliance to a certain extent, however increased knowledge does not necessarily equate to an increase in risk-mitigating behaviour. This highlights that the construction of risk is complex and circumstance-specific and to get a real grasp on compliance with IPCs, this construction needs to be explored in more depth. Elsevier B.V. 2017-01-01 2016-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7126003/ /pubmed/28010906 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2016.11.015 Text en © 2017 Elsevier B.V. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Robin, Charlotte
Bettridge, Judy
McMaster, Fiona
Zoonotic disease risk perceptions in the British veterinary profession
title Zoonotic disease risk perceptions in the British veterinary profession
title_full Zoonotic disease risk perceptions in the British veterinary profession
title_fullStr Zoonotic disease risk perceptions in the British veterinary profession
title_full_unstemmed Zoonotic disease risk perceptions in the British veterinary profession
title_short Zoonotic disease risk perceptions in the British veterinary profession
title_sort zoonotic disease risk perceptions in the british veterinary profession
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7126003/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28010906
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2016.11.015
work_keys_str_mv AT robincharlotte zoonoticdiseaseriskperceptionsinthebritishveterinaryprofession
AT bettridgejudy zoonoticdiseaseriskperceptionsinthebritishveterinaryprofession
AT mcmasterfiona zoonoticdiseaseriskperceptionsinthebritishveterinaryprofession