Cargando…
Prevalence of Cryptosporidium infection in calves in France
Two multicentre surveys were conducted in France to estimate the prevalence of Cryptosporidium infection in calves using qualitative ELISA for detection of Cryptosporidium coproantigens and oocysts. The first survey involved 4–12-day-old calves in six dairy-calf distribution centres, collecting calv...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Science B.V.
2000
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7126214/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10729640 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4017(99)00230-7 |
_version_ | 1783516100023025664 |
---|---|
author | Lefay, Didier Naciri, Muriel Poirier, Pierre Chermette, René |
author_facet | Lefay, Didier Naciri, Muriel Poirier, Pierre Chermette, René |
author_sort | Lefay, Didier |
collection | PubMed |
description | Two multicentre surveys were conducted in France to estimate the prevalence of Cryptosporidium infection in calves using qualitative ELISA for detection of Cryptosporidium coproantigens and oocysts. The first survey involved 4–12-day-old calves in six dairy-calf distribution centres, collecting calves from seven Administrative Regions (Aquitaine, Bretagne, Franche-Comté, Lorraine, Normandie, Nord, Pays de Loire). For each region, 20 calves were selected every month for 12 consecutive months (October 1995–September 1996). Prevalence of Cryptosporidium infection was 17.9% (Confidence Intervals (C.I.) 95%=[16.1%; 19.8%]) among the 1628 selected calves, of which only 5.3% had diarrhoea. The second survey conducted between November 1995 and May 1996 involved 4–21-day-old calves examined by veterinary practitioners who selected 189 livestock farms of dairy- or suckler-type in ten Administrative Departments (Allier, Cantal, Creuse, Doubs, Ille-et-Vilaine, Maine-et-Loire, Manche, Pas-de-Calais, Saône-et-Loire, Vendée). Cryptosporidia were detected in 105 (55.6%) of the farms. Among the 440 calves examined, of which 398 (90.5%) presented diarrhoea, cryptosporidia were found in 191 animals, i.e. a prevalence of 43.4% (C.I. 95%=[38.8%; 48.0%]). Breed of calves and type of housing had very little impact on prevalence in this survey. Some regional variations could be noticed, even if cryptosporidia infection is widespread. Monthly variations could be related to seasonal peaks in calving with a lower infection rate during summer. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7126214 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2000 |
publisher | Elsevier Science B.V. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71262142020-04-08 Prevalence of Cryptosporidium infection in calves in France Lefay, Didier Naciri, Muriel Poirier, Pierre Chermette, René Vet Parasitol Article Two multicentre surveys were conducted in France to estimate the prevalence of Cryptosporidium infection in calves using qualitative ELISA for detection of Cryptosporidium coproantigens and oocysts. The first survey involved 4–12-day-old calves in six dairy-calf distribution centres, collecting calves from seven Administrative Regions (Aquitaine, Bretagne, Franche-Comté, Lorraine, Normandie, Nord, Pays de Loire). For each region, 20 calves were selected every month for 12 consecutive months (October 1995–September 1996). Prevalence of Cryptosporidium infection was 17.9% (Confidence Intervals (C.I.) 95%=[16.1%; 19.8%]) among the 1628 selected calves, of which only 5.3% had diarrhoea. The second survey conducted between November 1995 and May 1996 involved 4–21-day-old calves examined by veterinary practitioners who selected 189 livestock farms of dairy- or suckler-type in ten Administrative Departments (Allier, Cantal, Creuse, Doubs, Ille-et-Vilaine, Maine-et-Loire, Manche, Pas-de-Calais, Saône-et-Loire, Vendée). Cryptosporidia were detected in 105 (55.6%) of the farms. Among the 440 calves examined, of which 398 (90.5%) presented diarrhoea, cryptosporidia were found in 191 animals, i.e. a prevalence of 43.4% (C.I. 95%=[38.8%; 48.0%]). Breed of calves and type of housing had very little impact on prevalence in this survey. Some regional variations could be noticed, even if cryptosporidia infection is widespread. Monthly variations could be related to seasonal peaks in calving with a lower infection rate during summer. Elsevier Science B.V. 2000-03-28 2000-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7126214/ /pubmed/10729640 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4017(99)00230-7 Text en Copyright © 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Lefay, Didier Naciri, Muriel Poirier, Pierre Chermette, René Prevalence of Cryptosporidium infection in calves in France |
title | Prevalence of Cryptosporidium infection in calves in France |
title_full | Prevalence of Cryptosporidium infection in calves in France |
title_fullStr | Prevalence of Cryptosporidium infection in calves in France |
title_full_unstemmed | Prevalence of Cryptosporidium infection in calves in France |
title_short | Prevalence of Cryptosporidium infection in calves in France |
title_sort | prevalence of cryptosporidium infection in calves in france |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7126214/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10729640 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4017(99)00230-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lefaydidier prevalenceofcryptosporidiuminfectionincalvesinfrance AT nacirimuriel prevalenceofcryptosporidiuminfectionincalvesinfrance AT poirierpierre prevalenceofcryptosporidiuminfectionincalvesinfrance AT chermetterene prevalenceofcryptosporidiuminfectionincalvesinfrance |