Cargando…

The role of RNA pseudoknot stem 1 length in the promotion of efficient −1 ribosomal frameshifting

The ribosomal frameshifting signal present in the genomic RNA of the coronavirus infectious bronchitis virus (IBV) contains a classic hairpin-type RNA pseudoknot that is believed to possess coaxially stacked stems of 11 bp (stem 1) and 6 bp (stem 2). We investigated the influence of stem 1 length on...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Napthine, Sawsan, Liphardt, Jan, Bloys, Alison, Routledge, Samantha, Brierley, Ian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Academic Press. 1999
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7126229/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10329144
http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.1999.2688
_version_ 1783516103010418688
author Napthine, Sawsan
Liphardt, Jan
Bloys, Alison
Routledge, Samantha
Brierley, Ian
author_facet Napthine, Sawsan
Liphardt, Jan
Bloys, Alison
Routledge, Samantha
Brierley, Ian
author_sort Napthine, Sawsan
collection PubMed
description The ribosomal frameshifting signal present in the genomic RNA of the coronavirus infectious bronchitis virus (IBV) contains a classic hairpin-type RNA pseudoknot that is believed to possess coaxially stacked stems of 11 bp (stem 1) and 6 bp (stem 2). We investigated the influence of stem 1 length on the frameshift process by measuring the frameshift efficiency in vitro of a series of IBV-based pseudoknots whose stem 1 length was varied from 4 to 13 bp in single base-pair increments. Efficient frameshifting depended upon the presence of a minimum of 11 bp; pseudoknots with a shorter stem 1 were either non-functional or had reduced frameshift efficiency, despite the fact that a number of them had a stem 1 with a predicted stability equal to or greater than that of the wild-type IBV pseudoknot. An upper limit for stem 1 length was not determined, but pseudoknots containing a 12 or 13 bp stem 1 were fully functional. Structure probing analysis was carried out on RNAs containing either a ten or 11 bp stem 1; these experiments confirmed that both RNAs formed pseudoknots and appeared to be indistinguishable in conformation. Thus the difference in frameshifting efficiency seen with the two structures was not simply due to an inability of the 10 bp stem 1 construct to fold into a pseudoknot. In an attempt to identify other parameters which could account for the poor functionality of the shorter stem 1-containing pseudoknots, we investigated, in the context of the 10 bp stem 1 construct, the influence on frameshifting of altering the slippery sequence-pseudoknot spacing distance, loop 2 length, and the number of G residues at the bottom of the 5′-arm of stem 1. For each parameter, it was possible to find a condition where a modest stimulation of frameshifting was observable (about twofold, from seven to a maximal 17 %), but we were unable to find a situation where frameshifting approached the levels seen with 11 bp stem 1 constructs (48-57 %). Furthermore, in the next smaller construct (9 bp stem 1), changing the bottom four base-pairs to G·C (the optimal base composition) only stimulated frameshifting from 3 to 6 %, an efficiency about tenfold lower than seen with the 11 bp construct. Thus stem 1 length is a major factor in determining the functionality of this class of pseudoknot and this has implications for models of the frameshift process.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7126229
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1999
publisher Academic Press.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71262292020-04-08 The role of RNA pseudoknot stem 1 length in the promotion of efficient −1 ribosomal frameshifting Napthine, Sawsan Liphardt, Jan Bloys, Alison Routledge, Samantha Brierley, Ian J Mol Biol Article The ribosomal frameshifting signal present in the genomic RNA of the coronavirus infectious bronchitis virus (IBV) contains a classic hairpin-type RNA pseudoknot that is believed to possess coaxially stacked stems of 11 bp (stem 1) and 6 bp (stem 2). We investigated the influence of stem 1 length on the frameshift process by measuring the frameshift efficiency in vitro of a series of IBV-based pseudoknots whose stem 1 length was varied from 4 to 13 bp in single base-pair increments. Efficient frameshifting depended upon the presence of a minimum of 11 bp; pseudoknots with a shorter stem 1 were either non-functional or had reduced frameshift efficiency, despite the fact that a number of them had a stem 1 with a predicted stability equal to or greater than that of the wild-type IBV pseudoknot. An upper limit for stem 1 length was not determined, but pseudoknots containing a 12 or 13 bp stem 1 were fully functional. Structure probing analysis was carried out on RNAs containing either a ten or 11 bp stem 1; these experiments confirmed that both RNAs formed pseudoknots and appeared to be indistinguishable in conformation. Thus the difference in frameshifting efficiency seen with the two structures was not simply due to an inability of the 10 bp stem 1 construct to fold into a pseudoknot. In an attempt to identify other parameters which could account for the poor functionality of the shorter stem 1-containing pseudoknots, we investigated, in the context of the 10 bp stem 1 construct, the influence on frameshifting of altering the slippery sequence-pseudoknot spacing distance, loop 2 length, and the number of G residues at the bottom of the 5′-arm of stem 1. For each parameter, it was possible to find a condition where a modest stimulation of frameshifting was observable (about twofold, from seven to a maximal 17 %), but we were unable to find a situation where frameshifting approached the levels seen with 11 bp stem 1 constructs (48-57 %). Furthermore, in the next smaller construct (9 bp stem 1), changing the bottom four base-pairs to G·C (the optimal base composition) only stimulated frameshifting from 3 to 6 %, an efficiency about tenfold lower than seen with the 11 bp construct. Thus stem 1 length is a major factor in determining the functionality of this class of pseudoknot and this has implications for models of the frameshift process. Academic Press. 1999-05-07 2002-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7126229/ /pubmed/10329144 http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.1999.2688 Text en Copyright © 1999 Academic Press. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Napthine, Sawsan
Liphardt, Jan
Bloys, Alison
Routledge, Samantha
Brierley, Ian
The role of RNA pseudoknot stem 1 length in the promotion of efficient −1 ribosomal frameshifting
title The role of RNA pseudoknot stem 1 length in the promotion of efficient −1 ribosomal frameshifting
title_full The role of RNA pseudoknot stem 1 length in the promotion of efficient −1 ribosomal frameshifting
title_fullStr The role of RNA pseudoknot stem 1 length in the promotion of efficient −1 ribosomal frameshifting
title_full_unstemmed The role of RNA pseudoknot stem 1 length in the promotion of efficient −1 ribosomal frameshifting
title_short The role of RNA pseudoknot stem 1 length in the promotion of efficient −1 ribosomal frameshifting
title_sort role of rna pseudoknot stem 1 length in the promotion of efficient −1 ribosomal frameshifting
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7126229/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10329144
http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.1999.2688
work_keys_str_mv AT napthinesawsan theroleofrnapseudoknotstem1lengthinthepromotionofefficient1ribosomalframeshifting
AT liphardtjan theroleofrnapseudoknotstem1lengthinthepromotionofefficient1ribosomalframeshifting
AT bloysalison theroleofrnapseudoknotstem1lengthinthepromotionofefficient1ribosomalframeshifting
AT routledgesamantha theroleofrnapseudoknotstem1lengthinthepromotionofefficient1ribosomalframeshifting
AT brierleyian theroleofrnapseudoknotstem1lengthinthepromotionofefficient1ribosomalframeshifting
AT napthinesawsan roleofrnapseudoknotstem1lengthinthepromotionofefficient1ribosomalframeshifting
AT liphardtjan roleofrnapseudoknotstem1lengthinthepromotionofefficient1ribosomalframeshifting
AT bloysalison roleofrnapseudoknotstem1lengthinthepromotionofefficient1ribosomalframeshifting
AT routledgesamantha roleofrnapseudoknotstem1lengthinthepromotionofefficient1ribosomalframeshifting
AT brierleyian roleofrnapseudoknotstem1lengthinthepromotionofefficient1ribosomalframeshifting