Cargando…

Kinematic Analyses of Parkour Landings from as High as 2.7 Meters

Developing effective landing strategies has implications for both injury prevention and performance training. The purpose was to quantify the kinematics of Parkour practitioners’ landings from three heights utilizing four techniques. Seventeen male and three female Parkour practitioners landed from...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dai, Boyi, Layer, Jacob S., Hinshaw, Taylour J., Cook, Ross F., Dufek, Janet S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sciendo 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7126243/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32269644
http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/hukin-2019-0123
_version_ 1783516106033463296
author Dai, Boyi
Layer, Jacob S.
Hinshaw, Taylour J.
Cook, Ross F.
Dufek, Janet S.
author_facet Dai, Boyi
Layer, Jacob S.
Hinshaw, Taylour J.
Cook, Ross F.
Dufek, Janet S.
author_sort Dai, Boyi
collection PubMed
description Developing effective landing strategies has implications for both injury prevention and performance training. The purpose was to quantify the kinematics of Parkour practitioners’ landings from three heights utilizing four techniques. Seventeen male and three female Parkour practitioners landed from 0.9, 1.8, and 2.7 m utilizing the squat, forward, roll, and stiff landing techniques when three-dimensional kinematics were collected. The stiff landing demonstrated the shortest landing time, and the roll landing showed the longest landing time for 1.8 and 2.7 m. Roll landings demonstrated the greatest forward velocities at initial contact and at the end of the landing. Stiff landings showed the greatest changes in vertical velocity during the early landing, while roll landings showed the least changes for 0.9 and 1.8 m. Both roll and stiff landings generally resulted in decreased changes in horizontal velocity during the early landing compared to squat and forward landings. The four landing techniques also demonstrated different lower extremity joint angles. Stiff landings may increase injury risk because of the quick decrease of vertical velocities. Roll landings allow individuals to decrease vertical and horizontal velocities over a longer time, which is likely to decrease the peak loading imposed on the lower extremities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7126243
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Sciendo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71262432020-04-08 Kinematic Analyses of Parkour Landings from as High as 2.7 Meters Dai, Boyi Layer, Jacob S. Hinshaw, Taylour J. Cook, Ross F. Dufek, Janet S. J Hum Kinet Section I – Kinesiology Developing effective landing strategies has implications for both injury prevention and performance training. The purpose was to quantify the kinematics of Parkour practitioners’ landings from three heights utilizing four techniques. Seventeen male and three female Parkour practitioners landed from 0.9, 1.8, and 2.7 m utilizing the squat, forward, roll, and stiff landing techniques when three-dimensional kinematics were collected. The stiff landing demonstrated the shortest landing time, and the roll landing showed the longest landing time for 1.8 and 2.7 m. Roll landings demonstrated the greatest forward velocities at initial contact and at the end of the landing. Stiff landings showed the greatest changes in vertical velocity during the early landing, while roll landings showed the least changes for 0.9 and 1.8 m. Both roll and stiff landings generally resulted in decreased changes in horizontal velocity during the early landing compared to squat and forward landings. The four landing techniques also demonstrated different lower extremity joint angles. Stiff landings may increase injury risk because of the quick decrease of vertical velocities. Roll landings allow individuals to decrease vertical and horizontal velocities over a longer time, which is likely to decrease the peak loading imposed on the lower extremities. Sciendo 2020-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7126243/ /pubmed/32269644 http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/hukin-2019-0123 Text en © 2020 Boyi Dai, Jacob S. Layer, Taylour J. Hinshaw, Ross F. Cook, Janet S. Dufek, published by Sciendo http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
spellingShingle Section I – Kinesiology
Dai, Boyi
Layer, Jacob S.
Hinshaw, Taylour J.
Cook, Ross F.
Dufek, Janet S.
Kinematic Analyses of Parkour Landings from as High as 2.7 Meters
title Kinematic Analyses of Parkour Landings from as High as 2.7 Meters
title_full Kinematic Analyses of Parkour Landings from as High as 2.7 Meters
title_fullStr Kinematic Analyses of Parkour Landings from as High as 2.7 Meters
title_full_unstemmed Kinematic Analyses of Parkour Landings from as High as 2.7 Meters
title_short Kinematic Analyses of Parkour Landings from as High as 2.7 Meters
title_sort kinematic analyses of parkour landings from as high as 2.7 meters
topic Section I – Kinesiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7126243/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32269644
http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/hukin-2019-0123
work_keys_str_mv AT daiboyi kinematicanalysesofparkourlandingsfromashighas27meters
AT layerjacobs kinematicanalysesofparkourlandingsfromashighas27meters
AT hinshawtaylourj kinematicanalysesofparkourlandingsfromashighas27meters
AT cookrossf kinematicanalysesofparkourlandingsfromashighas27meters
AT dufekjanets kinematicanalysesofparkourlandingsfromashighas27meters