Cargando…
Development, Implementation, and Process Evaluation of a Regional Palliative Care Quality Improvement Project
The delivery of optimal palliative care requires an integrated and coordinated approach of many health care providers across the continuum of care. In response to identified gaps in the region, the Palliative Care Integration Project (PCIP) was developed to improve continuity and decrease variabilit...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee. Published by Elsevier Inc.
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7126310/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19699607 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2008.12.006 |
_version_ | 1783516120635932672 |
---|---|
author | Dudgeon, Deborah J. Knott, Christine Chapman, Cheryl Coulson, Kathy Jeffery, Elizabeth Preston, Sharon Eichholz, Mary Van Dijk, Janice P. Smith, Anne |
author_facet | Dudgeon, Deborah J. Knott, Christine Chapman, Cheryl Coulson, Kathy Jeffery, Elizabeth Preston, Sharon Eichholz, Mary Van Dijk, Janice P. Smith, Anne |
author_sort | Dudgeon, Deborah J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The delivery of optimal palliative care requires an integrated and coordinated approach of many health care providers across the continuum of care. In response to identified gaps in the region, the Palliative Care Integration Project (PCIP) was developed to improve continuity and decrease variability of care to palliative patients with cancer. The infrastructure for the project included multi-institutional and multisectoral representation on the Steering Committee and on the Development, Implementation and Evaluation Working Groups. After review of the literature, five Collaborative Care Plans and Symptom Management Guidelines were developed and integrated with validated assessment tools (Edmonton Symptom Assessment System and Palliative Performance Scale). These project resources were implemented in the community, the palliative care unit, and the cancer center. Surveys were completed by frontline health professionals (defined as health professionals providing direct care), and two independent focus groups were conducted to capture information regarding: 1) the development of the project and 2) the processes of implementation and usefulness of the different components of the project. Over 90 individuals from more than 30 organizations were involved in the development, implementation, and evaluation of the PCIP. Approximately 600 regulated health professionals and allied health professionals who provided direct care, and over 200 family physicians and medical residents, received education/training on the use of the PCIP resources. Despite unanticipated challenges, frontline health professionals reported that the PCIP added value to their practice, particularly in the community sector. The PCIP showed that a network in which each organization had ownership and where no organization lost its autonomy, was an effective way to improve integration and coordination of care delivery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7126310 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee. Published by Elsevier Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71263102020-04-08 Development, Implementation, and Process Evaluation of a Regional Palliative Care Quality Improvement Project Dudgeon, Deborah J. Knott, Christine Chapman, Cheryl Coulson, Kathy Jeffery, Elizabeth Preston, Sharon Eichholz, Mary Van Dijk, Janice P. Smith, Anne J Pain Symptom Manage Original Article The delivery of optimal palliative care requires an integrated and coordinated approach of many health care providers across the continuum of care. In response to identified gaps in the region, the Palliative Care Integration Project (PCIP) was developed to improve continuity and decrease variability of care to palliative patients with cancer. The infrastructure for the project included multi-institutional and multisectoral representation on the Steering Committee and on the Development, Implementation and Evaluation Working Groups. After review of the literature, five Collaborative Care Plans and Symptom Management Guidelines were developed and integrated with validated assessment tools (Edmonton Symptom Assessment System and Palliative Performance Scale). These project resources were implemented in the community, the palliative care unit, and the cancer center. Surveys were completed by frontline health professionals (defined as health professionals providing direct care), and two independent focus groups were conducted to capture information regarding: 1) the development of the project and 2) the processes of implementation and usefulness of the different components of the project. Over 90 individuals from more than 30 organizations were involved in the development, implementation, and evaluation of the PCIP. Approximately 600 regulated health professionals and allied health professionals who provided direct care, and over 200 family physicians and medical residents, received education/training on the use of the PCIP resources. Despite unanticipated challenges, frontline health professionals reported that the PCIP added value to their practice, particularly in the community sector. The PCIP showed that a network in which each organization had ownership and where no organization lost its autonomy, was an effective way to improve integration and coordination of care delivery. U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee. Published by Elsevier Inc. 2009-10 2009-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7126310/ /pubmed/19699607 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2008.12.006 Text en Copyright © 2009 U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Dudgeon, Deborah J. Knott, Christine Chapman, Cheryl Coulson, Kathy Jeffery, Elizabeth Preston, Sharon Eichholz, Mary Van Dijk, Janice P. Smith, Anne Development, Implementation, and Process Evaluation of a Regional Palliative Care Quality Improvement Project |
title | Development, Implementation, and Process Evaluation of a Regional Palliative Care Quality Improvement Project |
title_full | Development, Implementation, and Process Evaluation of a Regional Palliative Care Quality Improvement Project |
title_fullStr | Development, Implementation, and Process Evaluation of a Regional Palliative Care Quality Improvement Project |
title_full_unstemmed | Development, Implementation, and Process Evaluation of a Regional Palliative Care Quality Improvement Project |
title_short | Development, Implementation, and Process Evaluation of a Regional Palliative Care Quality Improvement Project |
title_sort | development, implementation, and process evaluation of a regional palliative care quality improvement project |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7126310/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19699607 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2008.12.006 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dudgeondeborahj developmentimplementationandprocessevaluationofaregionalpalliativecarequalityimprovementproject AT knottchristine developmentimplementationandprocessevaluationofaregionalpalliativecarequalityimprovementproject AT chapmancheryl developmentimplementationandprocessevaluationofaregionalpalliativecarequalityimprovementproject AT coulsonkathy developmentimplementationandprocessevaluationofaregionalpalliativecarequalityimprovementproject AT jefferyelizabeth developmentimplementationandprocessevaluationofaregionalpalliativecarequalityimprovementproject AT prestonsharon developmentimplementationandprocessevaluationofaregionalpalliativecarequalityimprovementproject AT eichholzmary developmentimplementationandprocessevaluationofaregionalpalliativecarequalityimprovementproject AT vandijkjanicep developmentimplementationandprocessevaluationofaregionalpalliativecarequalityimprovementproject AT smithanne developmentimplementationandprocessevaluationofaregionalpalliativecarequalityimprovementproject |