Cargando…
A systematic review of FTA cards® as a tool for viral RNA preservation in fieldwork: Are they safe and effective?
BackgroundDetection and characterization of viral RNA pathogens from fieldwork are challenging due to the instability of the RNA molecule. FTA cards® have proved useful for sample storage and latter identification of pathogens with importance for agricultural, animal and human health: however, for o...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier B.V.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7126379/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31607414 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2019.104772 |
_version_ | 1783516133382422528 |
---|---|
author | Cardona-Ospina, Jaime A. Villalba-Miranda, Manuel F. Palechor-Ocampo, Leidy A. Mancilla, Lida I. Sepúlveda-Arias, Juan C. |
author_facet | Cardona-Ospina, Jaime A. Villalba-Miranda, Manuel F. Palechor-Ocampo, Leidy A. Mancilla, Lida I. Sepúlveda-Arias, Juan C. |
author_sort | Cardona-Ospina, Jaime A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BackgroundDetection and characterization of viral RNA pathogens from fieldwork are challenging due to the instability of the RNA molecule. FTA cards® have proved useful for sample storage and latter identification of pathogens with importance for agricultural, animal and human health: however, for optimal handling, processing, and biosafety measures are not well-established. ObjectiveThis systematic review aims to summarize the reported effectiveness of FTA cards® for storage and transport of viral RNA, as well as the conditions for their handling and use in downstream processes. Finally, the biosafety measures required to protect researchers and clinical lab workers are considered. MethodsWe performed a systematic review following the PRISMA statement. We searched MEDLINE (PubMed), Scopus and Web of Science using the keywords “FTA cards” AND “RNA”. Articles were screened by title and abstract, and after examination of inclusion and exclusion criteria, relevant information was extracted. The quality of the studies was assessed, and the evidence was qualitatively summarized. ResultsA total of 175 records were retrieved, and 11 additional documents were found by checking references of the eligible articles. A total of 47 articles were included. Samples from animals accounted for 38.3% of the publications, which identified viruses that cause disease in poultry, wild birds, suids, or bovids. Three different methods for RNA extraction were reported. Other factors that vary across reports include the size of RNA amplicon, storage temperature, and duration of storage. Only fourteen articles tested the inactivation of the virus on the FTA card®, and in one case, the virus remained infective. ConclusionFTA cards® could be a suitable option for RNA virus storage and transport for fieldwork in areas where proper conditions for RNA preservation are difficult to achieve. Three different protocols have been used for RNA detection from this matrix. Biospecimens in the form of dried blood spots should be considered potentially infectious unless specifically treated to inactivate viral pathogens. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7126379 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Elsevier B.V. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71263792020-04-08 A systematic review of FTA cards® as a tool for viral RNA preservation in fieldwork: Are they safe and effective? Cardona-Ospina, Jaime A. Villalba-Miranda, Manuel F. Palechor-Ocampo, Leidy A. Mancilla, Lida I. Sepúlveda-Arias, Juan C. Prev Vet Med Article BackgroundDetection and characterization of viral RNA pathogens from fieldwork are challenging due to the instability of the RNA molecule. FTA cards® have proved useful for sample storage and latter identification of pathogens with importance for agricultural, animal and human health: however, for optimal handling, processing, and biosafety measures are not well-established. ObjectiveThis systematic review aims to summarize the reported effectiveness of FTA cards® for storage and transport of viral RNA, as well as the conditions for their handling and use in downstream processes. Finally, the biosafety measures required to protect researchers and clinical lab workers are considered. MethodsWe performed a systematic review following the PRISMA statement. We searched MEDLINE (PubMed), Scopus and Web of Science using the keywords “FTA cards” AND “RNA”. Articles were screened by title and abstract, and after examination of inclusion and exclusion criteria, relevant information was extracted. The quality of the studies was assessed, and the evidence was qualitatively summarized. ResultsA total of 175 records were retrieved, and 11 additional documents were found by checking references of the eligible articles. A total of 47 articles were included. Samples from animals accounted for 38.3% of the publications, which identified viruses that cause disease in poultry, wild birds, suids, or bovids. Three different methods for RNA extraction were reported. Other factors that vary across reports include the size of RNA amplicon, storage temperature, and duration of storage. Only fourteen articles tested the inactivation of the virus on the FTA card®, and in one case, the virus remained infective. ConclusionFTA cards® could be a suitable option for RNA virus storage and transport for fieldwork in areas where proper conditions for RNA preservation are difficult to achieve. Three different protocols have been used for RNA detection from this matrix. Biospecimens in the form of dried blood spots should be considered potentially infectious unless specifically treated to inactivate viral pathogens. Elsevier B.V. 2019-11-15 2019-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7126379/ /pubmed/31607414 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2019.104772 Text en © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Cardona-Ospina, Jaime A. Villalba-Miranda, Manuel F. Palechor-Ocampo, Leidy A. Mancilla, Lida I. Sepúlveda-Arias, Juan C. A systematic review of FTA cards® as a tool for viral RNA preservation in fieldwork: Are they safe and effective? |
title | A systematic review of FTA cards® as a tool for viral RNA preservation in fieldwork: Are they safe and effective? |
title_full | A systematic review of FTA cards® as a tool for viral RNA preservation in fieldwork: Are they safe and effective? |
title_fullStr | A systematic review of FTA cards® as a tool for viral RNA preservation in fieldwork: Are they safe and effective? |
title_full_unstemmed | A systematic review of FTA cards® as a tool for viral RNA preservation in fieldwork: Are they safe and effective? |
title_short | A systematic review of FTA cards® as a tool for viral RNA preservation in fieldwork: Are they safe and effective? |
title_sort | systematic review of fta cards® as a tool for viral rna preservation in fieldwork: are they safe and effective? |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7126379/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31607414 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2019.104772 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cardonaospinajaimea asystematicreviewofftacardsasatoolforviralrnapreservationinfieldworkaretheysafeandeffective AT villalbamirandamanuelf asystematicreviewofftacardsasatoolforviralrnapreservationinfieldworkaretheysafeandeffective AT palechorocampoleidya asystematicreviewofftacardsasatoolforviralrnapreservationinfieldworkaretheysafeandeffective AT mancillalidai asystematicreviewofftacardsasatoolforviralrnapreservationinfieldworkaretheysafeandeffective AT sepulvedaariasjuanc asystematicreviewofftacardsasatoolforviralrnapreservationinfieldworkaretheysafeandeffective AT cardonaospinajaimea systematicreviewofftacardsasatoolforviralrnapreservationinfieldworkaretheysafeandeffective AT villalbamirandamanuelf systematicreviewofftacardsasatoolforviralrnapreservationinfieldworkaretheysafeandeffective AT palechorocampoleidya systematicreviewofftacardsasatoolforviralrnapreservationinfieldworkaretheysafeandeffective AT mancillalidai systematicreviewofftacardsasatoolforviralrnapreservationinfieldworkaretheysafeandeffective AT sepulvedaariasjuanc systematicreviewofftacardsasatoolforviralrnapreservationinfieldworkaretheysafeandeffective |