Cargando…

Is influenza-like illness a useful concept and an appropriate test of influenza vaccine effectiveness?

PURPOSE: To assess the utility of “influenza-like illness” (ILI) and whether it appropriately tests influenza vaccine effectiveness. PRINCIPAL RESULTS: The WHO and CDC definitions of “influenza-like illness” are similar. However many studies use other definitions, some not specifying a temperature a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Thomas, Roger E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Ltd. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7127078/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24582634
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.02.059
_version_ 1783516282690207744
author Thomas, Roger E.
author_facet Thomas, Roger E.
author_sort Thomas, Roger E.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To assess the utility of “influenza-like illness” (ILI) and whether it appropriately tests influenza vaccine effectiveness. PRINCIPAL RESULTS: The WHO and CDC definitions of “influenza-like illness” are similar. However many studies use other definitions, some not specifying a temperature and requiring specific respiratory and/or systemic symptoms, making many samples non-comparable. Most ILI studies find less than 25% of cases are RT-PCR-positive, those which test for other viruses and bacteria usually find multiple other pathogens, and most identify no pathogen in about 50% of cases. ILI symptom and symptom combinations do not have high sensitivity or specificity in identifying PCR-positive influenza cases. Rapid influenza diagnostic tests are increasingly used to screen ILI cases and they have low sensitivity and high specificity when compared to RT-PCR in identifying influenza. MAIN CONCLUSIONS: The working diagnosis of ILI presumes influenza may be involved until proven otherwise. Health care workers would benefit by renaming the WHO and CDC ILI symptoms and signs as “acute respiratory illness” and also using the WHO acute severe respiratory illness definition if the illness is severe and meets this criterion. This renaming would shift attention to identify the viral and bacterial pathogens in cases and epidemics, identify new pathogens, implement vaccination plans appropriate to the identified pathogens, and estimate workload during the viral season. Randomised controlled trials testing the effectiveness of influenza vaccine require all participants to be assessed by a gold standard (RT-PCR). ILI has no role in measuring influenza vaccine effectiveness. ILI is well established in the literature and in the operational definition of many surveillance databases and its imprecise definition may be inhibiting progress in research and treatment. The current ILI definition could with benefit be renamed “acute respiratory illness,” with additional definitions for “severe acute respiratory illness” (SARI) with RT-PCR testing for pathogens to facilitate prevention and treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7127078
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Elsevier Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71270782020-04-08 Is influenza-like illness a useful concept and an appropriate test of influenza vaccine effectiveness? Thomas, Roger E. Vaccine Article PURPOSE: To assess the utility of “influenza-like illness” (ILI) and whether it appropriately tests influenza vaccine effectiveness. PRINCIPAL RESULTS: The WHO and CDC definitions of “influenza-like illness” are similar. However many studies use other definitions, some not specifying a temperature and requiring specific respiratory and/or systemic symptoms, making many samples non-comparable. Most ILI studies find less than 25% of cases are RT-PCR-positive, those which test for other viruses and bacteria usually find multiple other pathogens, and most identify no pathogen in about 50% of cases. ILI symptom and symptom combinations do not have high sensitivity or specificity in identifying PCR-positive influenza cases. Rapid influenza diagnostic tests are increasingly used to screen ILI cases and they have low sensitivity and high specificity when compared to RT-PCR in identifying influenza. MAIN CONCLUSIONS: The working diagnosis of ILI presumes influenza may be involved until proven otherwise. Health care workers would benefit by renaming the WHO and CDC ILI symptoms and signs as “acute respiratory illness” and also using the WHO acute severe respiratory illness definition if the illness is severe and meets this criterion. This renaming would shift attention to identify the viral and bacterial pathogens in cases and epidemics, identify new pathogens, implement vaccination plans appropriate to the identified pathogens, and estimate workload during the viral season. Randomised controlled trials testing the effectiveness of influenza vaccine require all participants to be assessed by a gold standard (RT-PCR). ILI has no role in measuring influenza vaccine effectiveness. ILI is well established in the literature and in the operational definition of many surveillance databases and its imprecise definition may be inhibiting progress in research and treatment. The current ILI definition could with benefit be renamed “acute respiratory illness,” with additional definitions for “severe acute respiratory illness” (SARI) with RT-PCR testing for pathogens to facilitate prevention and treatment. Elsevier Ltd. 2014-04-17 2014-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7127078/ /pubmed/24582634 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.02.059 Text en Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Thomas, Roger E.
Is influenza-like illness a useful concept and an appropriate test of influenza vaccine effectiveness?
title Is influenza-like illness a useful concept and an appropriate test of influenza vaccine effectiveness?
title_full Is influenza-like illness a useful concept and an appropriate test of influenza vaccine effectiveness?
title_fullStr Is influenza-like illness a useful concept and an appropriate test of influenza vaccine effectiveness?
title_full_unstemmed Is influenza-like illness a useful concept and an appropriate test of influenza vaccine effectiveness?
title_short Is influenza-like illness a useful concept and an appropriate test of influenza vaccine effectiveness?
title_sort is influenza-like illness a useful concept and an appropriate test of influenza vaccine effectiveness?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7127078/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24582634
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.02.059
work_keys_str_mv AT thomasrogere isinfluenzalikeillnessausefulconceptandanappropriatetestofinfluenzavaccineeffectiveness