Cargando…

Evaluation of a two-stage testing algorithm for the diagnosis of respiratory viral infections

New on-demand multiplex molecular respiratory viral diagnostics offer superior performance although can be expensive and some platforms cannot process multiple specimens simultaneously. We performed a retrospective study reviewing results of patients tested for respiratory viruses following introduc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gardiner, B.J., Parker, C.E.V., Rabson, A.R., Snydman, D.R., Doron, S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7127587/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29636246
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2018.03.007
_version_ 1783516392131133440
author Gardiner, B.J.
Parker, C.E.V.
Rabson, A.R.
Snydman, D.R.
Doron, S.
author_facet Gardiner, B.J.
Parker, C.E.V.
Rabson, A.R.
Snydman, D.R.
Doron, S.
author_sort Gardiner, B.J.
collection PubMed
description New on-demand multiplex molecular respiratory viral diagnostics offer superior performance although can be expensive and some platforms cannot process multiple specimens simultaneously. We performed a retrospective study reviewing results of patients tested for respiratory viruses following introduction of a two-stage testing algorithm incorporating an initial screen with Sofia® immunoassay then secondary Biofire Filmarray®, and compared to a period when only Filmarray® was used. Of 2976 testing episodes, 1814 underwent initial Sofia® then follow-up FilmArray®. A diagnosis of influenza was made by Sofia® in 282 patients, and by FilmArray® in an additional 163 (median time to result 1.12 hours versus 3.46 hours, P < 0.001). Significantly more patients received their diagnosis within 90 minutes in winter despite testing more samples (11.1% versus 3.4%, P < 0.001), and approximately $36,000 was saved. An algorithmic approach to respiratory viral diagnosis can combine the advantages of accuracy and speed and be cost saving.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7127587
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Elsevier Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71275872020-04-08 Evaluation of a two-stage testing algorithm for the diagnosis of respiratory viral infections Gardiner, B.J. Parker, C.E.V. Rabson, A.R. Snydman, D.R. Doron, S. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis Virology New on-demand multiplex molecular respiratory viral diagnostics offer superior performance although can be expensive and some platforms cannot process multiple specimens simultaneously. We performed a retrospective study reviewing results of patients tested for respiratory viruses following introduction of a two-stage testing algorithm incorporating an initial screen with Sofia® immunoassay then secondary Biofire Filmarray®, and compared to a period when only Filmarray® was used. Of 2976 testing episodes, 1814 underwent initial Sofia® then follow-up FilmArray®. A diagnosis of influenza was made by Sofia® in 282 patients, and by FilmArray® in an additional 163 (median time to result 1.12 hours versus 3.46 hours, P < 0.001). Significantly more patients received their diagnosis within 90 minutes in winter despite testing more samples (11.1% versus 3.4%, P < 0.001), and approximately $36,000 was saved. An algorithmic approach to respiratory viral diagnosis can combine the advantages of accuracy and speed and be cost saving. Elsevier Inc. 2018-08 2018-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7127587/ /pubmed/29636246 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2018.03.007 Text en © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Virology
Gardiner, B.J.
Parker, C.E.V.
Rabson, A.R.
Snydman, D.R.
Doron, S.
Evaluation of a two-stage testing algorithm for the diagnosis of respiratory viral infections
title Evaluation of a two-stage testing algorithm for the diagnosis of respiratory viral infections
title_full Evaluation of a two-stage testing algorithm for the diagnosis of respiratory viral infections
title_fullStr Evaluation of a two-stage testing algorithm for the diagnosis of respiratory viral infections
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a two-stage testing algorithm for the diagnosis of respiratory viral infections
title_short Evaluation of a two-stage testing algorithm for the diagnosis of respiratory viral infections
title_sort evaluation of a two-stage testing algorithm for the diagnosis of respiratory viral infections
topic Virology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7127587/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29636246
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2018.03.007
work_keys_str_mv AT gardinerbj evaluationofatwostagetestingalgorithmforthediagnosisofrespiratoryviralinfections
AT parkercev evaluationofatwostagetestingalgorithmforthediagnosisofrespiratoryviralinfections
AT rabsonar evaluationofatwostagetestingalgorithmforthediagnosisofrespiratoryviralinfections
AT snydmandr evaluationofatwostagetestingalgorithmforthediagnosisofrespiratoryviralinfections
AT dorons evaluationofatwostagetestingalgorithmforthediagnosisofrespiratoryviralinfections