Cargando…
Directional Airflow and Ventilation in Hospitals: A Case Study of Secondary Airborne Infection()
Since the 1990s, improvements in ventilation techniques and isolation procedures have been widely credited with the decline in nosocomial transmission of tuberculosis and other airborne diseases. Little effort, however, has been made to study the risk of isolation patients acquiring secondary infect...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Published by Elsevier Ltd.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7128644/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32288886 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.11.184 |
_version_ | 1783516610076606464 |
---|---|
author | Mousavi, Ehsan S. Grosskopf, Kevin R. |
author_facet | Mousavi, Ehsan S. Grosskopf, Kevin R. |
author_sort | Mousavi, Ehsan S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Since the 1990s, improvements in ventilation techniques and isolation procedures have been widely credited with the decline in nosocomial transmission of tuberculosis and other airborne diseases. Little effort, however, has been made to study the risk of isolation patients acquiring secondary infections from contaminated air migrating into negatively pressurized isolation rooms from adjacent spaces. As a result, an actual hospital was used to observe the transport of aerosol from a nursing station and general patient room to a nearby airborne infectious isolation room (AIIR). Aerosols ≤3.0 μm (viruses and most airborne bacteria) were found to be capable of migrating 14.5m from a general patient room to an AIIR anteroom entrance in <14 minutes at concentrations 2-5 times greater than ambient (e.g. background). Concentrations of aerosols within the anteroom and isolation room, however, remained virtually unchanged from ambient levels, indicating the effectiveness of door position and (or) ventilation. In contrast, gravitational settling and surface deposition appeared to limit the migration of aerosols >3.0 μm to the entrance of the general patient room (4.5m). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7128644 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Published by Elsevier Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71286442020-04-08 Directional Airflow and Ventilation in Hospitals: A Case Study of Secondary Airborne Infection() Mousavi, Ehsan S. Grosskopf, Kevin R. Energy Procedia Article Since the 1990s, improvements in ventilation techniques and isolation procedures have been widely credited with the decline in nosocomial transmission of tuberculosis and other airborne diseases. Little effort, however, has been made to study the risk of isolation patients acquiring secondary infections from contaminated air migrating into negatively pressurized isolation rooms from adjacent spaces. As a result, an actual hospital was used to observe the transport of aerosol from a nursing station and general patient room to a nearby airborne infectious isolation room (AIIR). Aerosols ≤3.0 μm (viruses and most airborne bacteria) were found to be capable of migrating 14.5m from a general patient room to an AIIR anteroom entrance in <14 minutes at concentrations 2-5 times greater than ambient (e.g. background). Concentrations of aerosols within the anteroom and isolation room, however, remained virtually unchanged from ambient levels, indicating the effectiveness of door position and (or) ventilation. In contrast, gravitational settling and surface deposition appeared to limit the migration of aerosols >3.0 μm to the entrance of the general patient room (4.5m). Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2015-11 2015-12-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7128644/ /pubmed/32288886 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.11.184 Text en Copyright © 2015 Published by Elsevier Ltd. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Mousavi, Ehsan S. Grosskopf, Kevin R. Directional Airflow and Ventilation in Hospitals: A Case Study of Secondary Airborne Infection() |
title | Directional Airflow and Ventilation in Hospitals: A Case Study of Secondary Airborne Infection() |
title_full | Directional Airflow and Ventilation in Hospitals: A Case Study of Secondary Airborne Infection() |
title_fullStr | Directional Airflow and Ventilation in Hospitals: A Case Study of Secondary Airborne Infection() |
title_full_unstemmed | Directional Airflow and Ventilation in Hospitals: A Case Study of Secondary Airborne Infection() |
title_short | Directional Airflow and Ventilation in Hospitals: A Case Study of Secondary Airborne Infection() |
title_sort | directional airflow and ventilation in hospitals: a case study of secondary airborne infection() |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7128644/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32288886 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.11.184 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mousaviehsans directionalairflowandventilationinhospitalsacasestudyofsecondaryairborneinfection AT grosskopfkevinr directionalairflowandventilationinhospitalsacasestudyofsecondaryairborneinfection |