Cargando…

Directional Airflow and Ventilation in Hospitals: A Case Study of Secondary Airborne Infection()

Since the 1990s, improvements in ventilation techniques and isolation procedures have been widely credited with the decline in nosocomial transmission of tuberculosis and other airborne diseases. Little effort, however, has been made to study the risk of isolation patients acquiring secondary infect...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mousavi, Ehsan S., Grosskopf, Kevin R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7128644/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32288886
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.11.184
_version_ 1783516610076606464
author Mousavi, Ehsan S.
Grosskopf, Kevin R.
author_facet Mousavi, Ehsan S.
Grosskopf, Kevin R.
author_sort Mousavi, Ehsan S.
collection PubMed
description Since the 1990s, improvements in ventilation techniques and isolation procedures have been widely credited with the decline in nosocomial transmission of tuberculosis and other airborne diseases. Little effort, however, has been made to study the risk of isolation patients acquiring secondary infections from contaminated air migrating into negatively pressurized isolation rooms from adjacent spaces. As a result, an actual hospital was used to observe the transport of aerosol from a nursing station and general patient room to a nearby airborne infectious isolation room (AIIR). Aerosols ≤3.0 μm (viruses and most airborne bacteria) were found to be capable of migrating 14.5m from a general patient room to an AIIR anteroom entrance in <14 minutes at concentrations 2-5 times greater than ambient (e.g. background). Concentrations of aerosols within the anteroom and isolation room, however, remained virtually unchanged from ambient levels, indicating the effectiveness of door position and (or) ventilation. In contrast, gravitational settling and surface deposition appeared to limit the migration of aerosols >3.0 μm to the entrance of the general patient room (4.5m).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7128644
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Published by Elsevier Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71286442020-04-08 Directional Airflow and Ventilation in Hospitals: A Case Study of Secondary Airborne Infection() Mousavi, Ehsan S. Grosskopf, Kevin R. Energy Procedia Article Since the 1990s, improvements in ventilation techniques and isolation procedures have been widely credited with the decline in nosocomial transmission of tuberculosis and other airborne diseases. Little effort, however, has been made to study the risk of isolation patients acquiring secondary infections from contaminated air migrating into negatively pressurized isolation rooms from adjacent spaces. As a result, an actual hospital was used to observe the transport of aerosol from a nursing station and general patient room to a nearby airborne infectious isolation room (AIIR). Aerosols ≤3.0 μm (viruses and most airborne bacteria) were found to be capable of migrating 14.5m from a general patient room to an AIIR anteroom entrance in <14 minutes at concentrations 2-5 times greater than ambient (e.g. background). Concentrations of aerosols within the anteroom and isolation room, however, remained virtually unchanged from ambient levels, indicating the effectiveness of door position and (or) ventilation. In contrast, gravitational settling and surface deposition appeared to limit the migration of aerosols >3.0 μm to the entrance of the general patient room (4.5m). Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2015-11 2015-12-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7128644/ /pubmed/32288886 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.11.184 Text en Copyright © 2015 Published by Elsevier Ltd. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Mousavi, Ehsan S.
Grosskopf, Kevin R.
Directional Airflow and Ventilation in Hospitals: A Case Study of Secondary Airborne Infection()
title Directional Airflow and Ventilation in Hospitals: A Case Study of Secondary Airborne Infection()
title_full Directional Airflow and Ventilation in Hospitals: A Case Study of Secondary Airborne Infection()
title_fullStr Directional Airflow and Ventilation in Hospitals: A Case Study of Secondary Airborne Infection()
title_full_unstemmed Directional Airflow and Ventilation in Hospitals: A Case Study of Secondary Airborne Infection()
title_short Directional Airflow and Ventilation in Hospitals: A Case Study of Secondary Airborne Infection()
title_sort directional airflow and ventilation in hospitals: a case study of secondary airborne infection()
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7128644/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32288886
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.11.184
work_keys_str_mv AT mousaviehsans directionalairflowandventilationinhospitalsacasestudyofsecondaryairborneinfection
AT grosskopfkevinr directionalairflowandventilationinhospitalsacasestudyofsecondaryairborneinfection