Cargando…

Non-animal replacement methods for human vaccine potency testing: state of the science and future directions

NICEATM and ICCVAM convened an international workshop to review the state of the science of human and veterinary vaccine potency and safety testing methods, and to identify opportunities to advance new and improved methods that can further reduce, refine, and replace animal use. This report addresse...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McFarland, Richard, Verthelyi, Daniela, Casey, Warren, Arciniega, Juan, Isbrucker, Richard, Schmitt, Michael, Finn, Theresa, Descamps, Johan, Horiuchi, Yoshinobu, Sesardic, Dorothea, Stickings, Paul, Johnson, Nelson W, Lipscomb, Elizabeth, Allen, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Published by Elsevier B.V. 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7129268/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32288913
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.provac.2011.10.002
_version_ 1783516747392876544
author McFarland, Richard
Verthelyi, Daniela
Casey, Warren
Arciniega, Juan
Isbrucker, Richard
Schmitt, Michael
Finn, Theresa
Descamps, Johan
Horiuchi, Yoshinobu
Sesardic, Dorothea
Stickings, Paul
Johnson, Nelson W
Lipscomb, Elizabeth
Allen, David
author_facet McFarland, Richard
Verthelyi, Daniela
Casey, Warren
Arciniega, Juan
Isbrucker, Richard
Schmitt, Michael
Finn, Theresa
Descamps, Johan
Horiuchi, Yoshinobu
Sesardic, Dorothea
Stickings, Paul
Johnson, Nelson W
Lipscomb, Elizabeth
Allen, David
author_sort McFarland, Richard
collection PubMed
description NICEATM and ICCVAM convened an international workshop to review the state of the science of human and veterinary vaccine potency and safety testing methods, and to identify opportunities to advance new and improved methods that can further reduce, refine, and replace animal use. This report addresses methods and strategies identified by workshop participants for replacement of animals used for potency testing of human vaccines. Vaccines considered to have the highest priority for future efforts were (1) vaccines for which antigen quantification methods are already developed but not validated, (2) vaccines/components that require the largest number of animals, (3) vaccines that require an in vivo challenge test, and (4) vaccines with in vivo tests that are highly variable and cause a significant number of invalid tests. Vaccine potency tests identified as the highest priorities for replacement were those for diphtheria and tetanus, pertussis (whole cell and acellular), rabies, anthrax, polio vaccine (inactivated) and complex combination vaccines based on DT or DTwP/aP. Research into understanding the precise mechanism of protection afforded by vaccines and the identification of clinically relevant immunological markers are needed to facilitate the successful implementation of in vitro testing alternatives. This report also identifies several priority human vaccines and associated research objectives that are necessary to successfully implement in vitro vaccine potency testing alternatives.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7129268
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Published by Elsevier B.V.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71292682020-04-08 Non-animal replacement methods for human vaccine potency testing: state of the science and future directions McFarland, Richard Verthelyi, Daniela Casey, Warren Arciniega, Juan Isbrucker, Richard Schmitt, Michael Finn, Theresa Descamps, Johan Horiuchi, Yoshinobu Sesardic, Dorothea Stickings, Paul Johnson, Nelson W Lipscomb, Elizabeth Allen, David Procedia Vaccinol Article NICEATM and ICCVAM convened an international workshop to review the state of the science of human and veterinary vaccine potency and safety testing methods, and to identify opportunities to advance new and improved methods that can further reduce, refine, and replace animal use. This report addresses methods and strategies identified by workshop participants for replacement of animals used for potency testing of human vaccines. Vaccines considered to have the highest priority for future efforts were (1) vaccines for which antigen quantification methods are already developed but not validated, (2) vaccines/components that require the largest number of animals, (3) vaccines that require an in vivo challenge test, and (4) vaccines with in vivo tests that are highly variable and cause a significant number of invalid tests. Vaccine potency tests identified as the highest priorities for replacement were those for diphtheria and tetanus, pertussis (whole cell and acellular), rabies, anthrax, polio vaccine (inactivated) and complex combination vaccines based on DT or DTwP/aP. Research into understanding the precise mechanism of protection afforded by vaccines and the identification of clinically relevant immunological markers are needed to facilitate the successful implementation of in vitro testing alternatives. This report also identifies several priority human vaccines and associated research objectives that are necessary to successfully implement in vitro vaccine potency testing alternatives. Published by Elsevier B.V. 2011 2011-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7129268/ /pubmed/32288913 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.provac.2011.10.002 Text en Copyright © 2012 Published by Elsevier B.V. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
McFarland, Richard
Verthelyi, Daniela
Casey, Warren
Arciniega, Juan
Isbrucker, Richard
Schmitt, Michael
Finn, Theresa
Descamps, Johan
Horiuchi, Yoshinobu
Sesardic, Dorothea
Stickings, Paul
Johnson, Nelson W
Lipscomb, Elizabeth
Allen, David
Non-animal replacement methods for human vaccine potency testing: state of the science and future directions
title Non-animal replacement methods for human vaccine potency testing: state of the science and future directions
title_full Non-animal replacement methods for human vaccine potency testing: state of the science and future directions
title_fullStr Non-animal replacement methods for human vaccine potency testing: state of the science and future directions
title_full_unstemmed Non-animal replacement methods for human vaccine potency testing: state of the science and future directions
title_short Non-animal replacement methods for human vaccine potency testing: state of the science and future directions
title_sort non-animal replacement methods for human vaccine potency testing: state of the science and future directions
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7129268/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32288913
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.provac.2011.10.002
work_keys_str_mv AT mcfarlandrichard nonanimalreplacementmethodsforhumanvaccinepotencytestingstateofthescienceandfuturedirections
AT verthelyidaniela nonanimalreplacementmethodsforhumanvaccinepotencytestingstateofthescienceandfuturedirections
AT caseywarren nonanimalreplacementmethodsforhumanvaccinepotencytestingstateofthescienceandfuturedirections
AT arciniegajuan nonanimalreplacementmethodsforhumanvaccinepotencytestingstateofthescienceandfuturedirections
AT isbruckerrichard nonanimalreplacementmethodsforhumanvaccinepotencytestingstateofthescienceandfuturedirections
AT schmittmichael nonanimalreplacementmethodsforhumanvaccinepotencytestingstateofthescienceandfuturedirections
AT finntheresa nonanimalreplacementmethodsforhumanvaccinepotencytestingstateofthescienceandfuturedirections
AT descampsjohan nonanimalreplacementmethodsforhumanvaccinepotencytestingstateofthescienceandfuturedirections
AT horiuchiyoshinobu nonanimalreplacementmethodsforhumanvaccinepotencytestingstateofthescienceandfuturedirections
AT sesardicdorothea nonanimalreplacementmethodsforhumanvaccinepotencytestingstateofthescienceandfuturedirections
AT stickingspaul nonanimalreplacementmethodsforhumanvaccinepotencytestingstateofthescienceandfuturedirections
AT johnsonnelsonw nonanimalreplacementmethodsforhumanvaccinepotencytestingstateofthescienceandfuturedirections
AT lipscombelizabeth nonanimalreplacementmethodsforhumanvaccinepotencytestingstateofthescienceandfuturedirections
AT allendavid nonanimalreplacementmethodsforhumanvaccinepotencytestingstateofthescienceandfuturedirections