Cargando…
The views of physicians and nurses on the potentials of an electronic assessment system for recognizing the needs of patients in palliative care
OBJECTIVES: Patients in oncological and palliative care (PC) often have complex needs, which require a comprehensive treatment approach. The assessment of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) has been shown to improve identification of patient needs and foster adjustment of treatment. This study explore...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7129326/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32247316 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-020-00554-9 |
_version_ | 1783516760369004544 |
---|---|
author | Radionova, Natalia Becker, Gerhild Mayer-Steinacker, Regine Gencer, Deniz Rieger, Monika A. Preiser, Christine |
author_facet | Radionova, Natalia Becker, Gerhild Mayer-Steinacker, Regine Gencer, Deniz Rieger, Monika A. Preiser, Christine |
author_sort | Radionova, Natalia |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Patients in oncological and palliative care (PC) often have complex needs, which require a comprehensive treatment approach. The assessment of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) has been shown to improve identification of patient needs and foster adjustment of treatment. This study explores occupational routines, attitudes and expectations of physicians and nurses with regards to a planned electronic assessment system of PROs. METHODS: Ten physicians and nine nurses from various PC settings in Southern Germany were interviewed. The interviews were analysed with qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: The interviewees were sceptical about the quality of data generated through a patient self-assessment system. They criticised the rigidity of the electronic assessment questionnaire, which the interviewees noted may not fit the profile of all palliative patients. They feared the loss of personal contact between medical staff and patients and favoured in-person conversation and on-site observations on site over the potential system. Interviewees saw potential in being able to discover unseen needs from some patients. Interviewees evaluated the system positively in the case that the system served to broadly orient care plans without affecting or reducing the patient-caregiver relationship. CONCLUSIONS: A significant portion of the results touch upon the symbolic acceptance of the suggested system, which stands for an increasing standardisation and technisation of medicine where interpersonal contact and the professional expertise are marginalized. The study results can provide insight for processes and communication in the run-up to and during the implementation of electronic assessment systems. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7129326 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71293262020-04-10 The views of physicians and nurses on the potentials of an electronic assessment system for recognizing the needs of patients in palliative care Radionova, Natalia Becker, Gerhild Mayer-Steinacker, Regine Gencer, Deniz Rieger, Monika A. Preiser, Christine BMC Palliat Care Research Article OBJECTIVES: Patients in oncological and palliative care (PC) often have complex needs, which require a comprehensive treatment approach. The assessment of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) has been shown to improve identification of patient needs and foster adjustment of treatment. This study explores occupational routines, attitudes and expectations of physicians and nurses with regards to a planned electronic assessment system of PROs. METHODS: Ten physicians and nine nurses from various PC settings in Southern Germany were interviewed. The interviews were analysed with qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: The interviewees were sceptical about the quality of data generated through a patient self-assessment system. They criticised the rigidity of the electronic assessment questionnaire, which the interviewees noted may not fit the profile of all palliative patients. They feared the loss of personal contact between medical staff and patients and favoured in-person conversation and on-site observations on site over the potential system. Interviewees saw potential in being able to discover unseen needs from some patients. Interviewees evaluated the system positively in the case that the system served to broadly orient care plans without affecting or reducing the patient-caregiver relationship. CONCLUSIONS: A significant portion of the results touch upon the symbolic acceptance of the suggested system, which stands for an increasing standardisation and technisation of medicine where interpersonal contact and the professional expertise are marginalized. The study results can provide insight for processes and communication in the run-up to and during the implementation of electronic assessment systems. BioMed Central 2020-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7129326/ /pubmed/32247316 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-020-00554-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Radionova, Natalia Becker, Gerhild Mayer-Steinacker, Regine Gencer, Deniz Rieger, Monika A. Preiser, Christine The views of physicians and nurses on the potentials of an electronic assessment system for recognizing the needs of patients in palliative care |
title | The views of physicians and nurses on the potentials of an electronic assessment system for recognizing the needs of patients in palliative care |
title_full | The views of physicians and nurses on the potentials of an electronic assessment system for recognizing the needs of patients in palliative care |
title_fullStr | The views of physicians and nurses on the potentials of an electronic assessment system for recognizing the needs of patients in palliative care |
title_full_unstemmed | The views of physicians and nurses on the potentials of an electronic assessment system for recognizing the needs of patients in palliative care |
title_short | The views of physicians and nurses on the potentials of an electronic assessment system for recognizing the needs of patients in palliative care |
title_sort | views of physicians and nurses on the potentials of an electronic assessment system for recognizing the needs of patients in palliative care |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7129326/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32247316 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-020-00554-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT radionovanatalia theviewsofphysiciansandnursesonthepotentialsofanelectronicassessmentsystemforrecognizingtheneedsofpatientsinpalliativecare AT beckergerhild theviewsofphysiciansandnursesonthepotentialsofanelectronicassessmentsystemforrecognizingtheneedsofpatientsinpalliativecare AT mayersteinackerregine theviewsofphysiciansandnursesonthepotentialsofanelectronicassessmentsystemforrecognizingtheneedsofpatientsinpalliativecare AT gencerdeniz theviewsofphysiciansandnursesonthepotentialsofanelectronicassessmentsystemforrecognizingtheneedsofpatientsinpalliativecare AT riegermonikaa theviewsofphysiciansandnursesonthepotentialsofanelectronicassessmentsystemforrecognizingtheneedsofpatientsinpalliativecare AT preiserchristine theviewsofphysiciansandnursesonthepotentialsofanelectronicassessmentsystemforrecognizingtheneedsofpatientsinpalliativecare AT radionovanatalia viewsofphysiciansandnursesonthepotentialsofanelectronicassessmentsystemforrecognizingtheneedsofpatientsinpalliativecare AT beckergerhild viewsofphysiciansandnursesonthepotentialsofanelectronicassessmentsystemforrecognizingtheneedsofpatientsinpalliativecare AT mayersteinackerregine viewsofphysiciansandnursesonthepotentialsofanelectronicassessmentsystemforrecognizingtheneedsofpatientsinpalliativecare AT gencerdeniz viewsofphysiciansandnursesonthepotentialsofanelectronicassessmentsystemforrecognizingtheneedsofpatientsinpalliativecare AT riegermonikaa viewsofphysiciansandnursesonthepotentialsofanelectronicassessmentsystemforrecognizingtheneedsofpatientsinpalliativecare AT preiserchristine viewsofphysiciansandnursesonthepotentialsofanelectronicassessmentsystemforrecognizingtheneedsofpatientsinpalliativecare |