Cargando…

The views of physicians and nurses on the potentials of an electronic assessment system for recognizing the needs of patients in palliative care

OBJECTIVES: Patients in oncological and palliative care (PC) often have complex needs, which require a comprehensive treatment approach. The assessment of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) has been shown to improve identification of patient needs and foster adjustment of treatment. This study explore...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Radionova, Natalia, Becker, Gerhild, Mayer-Steinacker, Regine, Gencer, Deniz, Rieger, Monika A., Preiser, Christine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7129326/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32247316
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-020-00554-9
_version_ 1783516760369004544
author Radionova, Natalia
Becker, Gerhild
Mayer-Steinacker, Regine
Gencer, Deniz
Rieger, Monika A.
Preiser, Christine
author_facet Radionova, Natalia
Becker, Gerhild
Mayer-Steinacker, Regine
Gencer, Deniz
Rieger, Monika A.
Preiser, Christine
author_sort Radionova, Natalia
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Patients in oncological and palliative care (PC) often have complex needs, which require a comprehensive treatment approach. The assessment of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) has been shown to improve identification of patient needs and foster adjustment of treatment. This study explores occupational routines, attitudes and expectations of physicians and nurses with regards to a planned electronic assessment system of PROs. METHODS: Ten physicians and nine nurses from various PC settings in Southern Germany were interviewed. The interviews were analysed with qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: The interviewees were sceptical about the quality of data generated through a patient self-assessment system. They criticised the rigidity of the electronic assessment questionnaire, which the interviewees noted may not fit the profile of all palliative patients. They feared the loss of personal contact between medical staff and patients and favoured in-person conversation and on-site observations on site over the potential system. Interviewees saw potential in being able to discover unseen needs from some patients. Interviewees evaluated the system positively in the case that the system served to broadly orient care plans without affecting or reducing the patient-caregiver relationship. CONCLUSIONS: A significant portion of the results touch upon the symbolic acceptance of the suggested system, which stands for an increasing standardisation and technisation of medicine where interpersonal contact and the professional expertise are marginalized. The study results can provide insight for processes and communication in the run-up to and during the implementation of electronic assessment systems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7129326
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71293262020-04-10 The views of physicians and nurses on the potentials of an electronic assessment system for recognizing the needs of patients in palliative care Radionova, Natalia Becker, Gerhild Mayer-Steinacker, Regine Gencer, Deniz Rieger, Monika A. Preiser, Christine BMC Palliat Care Research Article OBJECTIVES: Patients in oncological and palliative care (PC) often have complex needs, which require a comprehensive treatment approach. The assessment of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) has been shown to improve identification of patient needs and foster adjustment of treatment. This study explores occupational routines, attitudes and expectations of physicians and nurses with regards to a planned electronic assessment system of PROs. METHODS: Ten physicians and nine nurses from various PC settings in Southern Germany were interviewed. The interviews were analysed with qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: The interviewees were sceptical about the quality of data generated through a patient self-assessment system. They criticised the rigidity of the electronic assessment questionnaire, which the interviewees noted may not fit the profile of all palliative patients. They feared the loss of personal contact between medical staff and patients and favoured in-person conversation and on-site observations on site over the potential system. Interviewees saw potential in being able to discover unseen needs from some patients. Interviewees evaluated the system positively in the case that the system served to broadly orient care plans without affecting or reducing the patient-caregiver relationship. CONCLUSIONS: A significant portion of the results touch upon the symbolic acceptance of the suggested system, which stands for an increasing standardisation and technisation of medicine where interpersonal contact and the professional expertise are marginalized. The study results can provide insight for processes and communication in the run-up to and during the implementation of electronic assessment systems. BioMed Central 2020-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7129326/ /pubmed/32247316 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-020-00554-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Radionova, Natalia
Becker, Gerhild
Mayer-Steinacker, Regine
Gencer, Deniz
Rieger, Monika A.
Preiser, Christine
The views of physicians and nurses on the potentials of an electronic assessment system for recognizing the needs of patients in palliative care
title The views of physicians and nurses on the potentials of an electronic assessment system for recognizing the needs of patients in palliative care
title_full The views of physicians and nurses on the potentials of an electronic assessment system for recognizing the needs of patients in palliative care
title_fullStr The views of physicians and nurses on the potentials of an electronic assessment system for recognizing the needs of patients in palliative care
title_full_unstemmed The views of physicians and nurses on the potentials of an electronic assessment system for recognizing the needs of patients in palliative care
title_short The views of physicians and nurses on the potentials of an electronic assessment system for recognizing the needs of patients in palliative care
title_sort views of physicians and nurses on the potentials of an electronic assessment system for recognizing the needs of patients in palliative care
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7129326/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32247316
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-020-00554-9
work_keys_str_mv AT radionovanatalia theviewsofphysiciansandnursesonthepotentialsofanelectronicassessmentsystemforrecognizingtheneedsofpatientsinpalliativecare
AT beckergerhild theviewsofphysiciansandnursesonthepotentialsofanelectronicassessmentsystemforrecognizingtheneedsofpatientsinpalliativecare
AT mayersteinackerregine theviewsofphysiciansandnursesonthepotentialsofanelectronicassessmentsystemforrecognizingtheneedsofpatientsinpalliativecare
AT gencerdeniz theviewsofphysiciansandnursesonthepotentialsofanelectronicassessmentsystemforrecognizingtheneedsofpatientsinpalliativecare
AT riegermonikaa theviewsofphysiciansandnursesonthepotentialsofanelectronicassessmentsystemforrecognizingtheneedsofpatientsinpalliativecare
AT preiserchristine theviewsofphysiciansandnursesonthepotentialsofanelectronicassessmentsystemforrecognizingtheneedsofpatientsinpalliativecare
AT radionovanatalia viewsofphysiciansandnursesonthepotentialsofanelectronicassessmentsystemforrecognizingtheneedsofpatientsinpalliativecare
AT beckergerhild viewsofphysiciansandnursesonthepotentialsofanelectronicassessmentsystemforrecognizingtheneedsofpatientsinpalliativecare
AT mayersteinackerregine viewsofphysiciansandnursesonthepotentialsofanelectronicassessmentsystemforrecognizingtheneedsofpatientsinpalliativecare
AT gencerdeniz viewsofphysiciansandnursesonthepotentialsofanelectronicassessmentsystemforrecognizingtheneedsofpatientsinpalliativecare
AT riegermonikaa viewsofphysiciansandnursesonthepotentialsofanelectronicassessmentsystemforrecognizingtheneedsofpatientsinpalliativecare
AT preiserchristine viewsofphysiciansandnursesonthepotentialsofanelectronicassessmentsystemforrecognizingtheneedsofpatientsinpalliativecare