Cargando…
Low-dose human menopausal gonadotrophin versus natural cycles in intrauterine insemination for subfertile couples with regular menstruation
BACKGROUND: Women with irregular menstruation should be considered to benefit from the ovarian stimulation. However, most literature did not separate ovulatory disorders from normal menstrual cycles. Our purpose was to assess the superiority of ovarian mild stimulation compared with the natural cycl...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7129328/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32247312 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13048-020-00638-3 |
_version_ | 1783516760819892224 |
---|---|
author | Li, Sichen He, Yuxia Cao, Mingzhu Liu, Hanyan Liu, Jianqiao |
author_facet | Li, Sichen He, Yuxia Cao, Mingzhu Liu, Hanyan Liu, Jianqiao |
author_sort | Li, Sichen |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Women with irregular menstruation should be considered to benefit from the ovarian stimulation. However, most literature did not separate ovulatory disorders from normal menstrual cycles. Our purpose was to assess the superiority of ovarian mild stimulation compared with the natural cycle in IUI for subfertile couples when the women with regular menstruation. METHODS: A retrospective study in a single medical center in which 2413 couples with 3573 IUI cycles were studied from 2013 to 2018. The results of IUI in natural cycles versus low-dose HMG induced cycles were analyzed. RESULTS: For young women (age < 35 years) with normal menstrual cycle, HMG induced ovulation combined with IUI can improve clinical pregnancy outcome (13.55% in two follicular induced cycles vs. 7.23% in natural cycles, p < 0.01); even if only one follicle was induced, the clinical pregnancy rate was increased to 10.32% (p < 0.01). When two growth follicles were induced in HMG cycles, a remarkable improvement of the live birthrate (10.28% vs. 5.91% in natural cycles, p < 0.05) was noted. Simultaneously, twin pregnancy rates were increased to 20.69% (p < 0.01). Twin pregnancies showed significantly increased risk of both ectopic pregnancy and preterm birth (p = 0.00 for both). For advanced women (age ≥ 35 years) with regular menstrual cycle, ovulation induction didn’t improve clinical pregnancy and live birthrates, while age was the only relevant factor. CONCLUSIONS: Combining HMG induced ovulation and IUI can improve pregnancy outcome in young women with normal menstrual cycles. 1–2 follicles with diameter ≥ 14 mm served as the purpose of ovulation induction. Further, both twin and ectopic pregnancy rate in HMG cycles with two growth follicles were significantly higher than those in natural cycles were. Therefore, doctors must evaluate the risk before making choices and inform the patients to achieve the best results. For advanced women with normal menstrual cycles, natural IUI cycles were optional. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7129328 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71293282020-04-10 Low-dose human menopausal gonadotrophin versus natural cycles in intrauterine insemination for subfertile couples with regular menstruation Li, Sichen He, Yuxia Cao, Mingzhu Liu, Hanyan Liu, Jianqiao J Ovarian Res Research BACKGROUND: Women with irregular menstruation should be considered to benefit from the ovarian stimulation. However, most literature did not separate ovulatory disorders from normal menstrual cycles. Our purpose was to assess the superiority of ovarian mild stimulation compared with the natural cycle in IUI for subfertile couples when the women with regular menstruation. METHODS: A retrospective study in a single medical center in which 2413 couples with 3573 IUI cycles were studied from 2013 to 2018. The results of IUI in natural cycles versus low-dose HMG induced cycles were analyzed. RESULTS: For young women (age < 35 years) with normal menstrual cycle, HMG induced ovulation combined with IUI can improve clinical pregnancy outcome (13.55% in two follicular induced cycles vs. 7.23% in natural cycles, p < 0.01); even if only one follicle was induced, the clinical pregnancy rate was increased to 10.32% (p < 0.01). When two growth follicles were induced in HMG cycles, a remarkable improvement of the live birthrate (10.28% vs. 5.91% in natural cycles, p < 0.05) was noted. Simultaneously, twin pregnancy rates were increased to 20.69% (p < 0.01). Twin pregnancies showed significantly increased risk of both ectopic pregnancy and preterm birth (p = 0.00 for both). For advanced women (age ≥ 35 years) with regular menstrual cycle, ovulation induction didn’t improve clinical pregnancy and live birthrates, while age was the only relevant factor. CONCLUSIONS: Combining HMG induced ovulation and IUI can improve pregnancy outcome in young women with normal menstrual cycles. 1–2 follicles with diameter ≥ 14 mm served as the purpose of ovulation induction. Further, both twin and ectopic pregnancy rate in HMG cycles with two growth follicles were significantly higher than those in natural cycles were. Therefore, doctors must evaluate the risk before making choices and inform the patients to achieve the best results. For advanced women with normal menstrual cycles, natural IUI cycles were optional. BioMed Central 2020-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7129328/ /pubmed/32247312 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13048-020-00638-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Li, Sichen He, Yuxia Cao, Mingzhu Liu, Hanyan Liu, Jianqiao Low-dose human menopausal gonadotrophin versus natural cycles in intrauterine insemination for subfertile couples with regular menstruation |
title | Low-dose human menopausal gonadotrophin versus natural cycles in intrauterine insemination for subfertile couples with regular menstruation |
title_full | Low-dose human menopausal gonadotrophin versus natural cycles in intrauterine insemination for subfertile couples with regular menstruation |
title_fullStr | Low-dose human menopausal gonadotrophin versus natural cycles in intrauterine insemination for subfertile couples with regular menstruation |
title_full_unstemmed | Low-dose human menopausal gonadotrophin versus natural cycles in intrauterine insemination for subfertile couples with regular menstruation |
title_short | Low-dose human menopausal gonadotrophin versus natural cycles in intrauterine insemination for subfertile couples with regular menstruation |
title_sort | low-dose human menopausal gonadotrophin versus natural cycles in intrauterine insemination for subfertile couples with regular menstruation |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7129328/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32247312 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13048-020-00638-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lisichen lowdosehumanmenopausalgonadotrophinversusnaturalcyclesinintrauterineinseminationforsubfertilecoupleswithregularmenstruation AT heyuxia lowdosehumanmenopausalgonadotrophinversusnaturalcyclesinintrauterineinseminationforsubfertilecoupleswithregularmenstruation AT caomingzhu lowdosehumanmenopausalgonadotrophinversusnaturalcyclesinintrauterineinseminationforsubfertilecoupleswithregularmenstruation AT liuhanyan lowdosehumanmenopausalgonadotrophinversusnaturalcyclesinintrauterineinseminationforsubfertilecoupleswithregularmenstruation AT liujianqiao lowdosehumanmenopausalgonadotrophinversusnaturalcyclesinintrauterineinseminationforsubfertilecoupleswithregularmenstruation |