Cargando…
Assessing the potential of upper respiratory tract point-of-care testing: a systematic review of the prognostic significance of upper respiratory tract microbes
OBJECTIVES: Microbial point-of-care testing (POCT) has potential to revolutionize clinical care. Understanding the prognostic value of microbes identified from the upper respiratory tract (a convenient sampling site) is a necessary first step to understand potential for upper respiratory tract POCTs...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7129693/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31254715 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2019.06.024 |
_version_ | 1783516843284103168 |
---|---|
author | Thornton, H.V. Turner, K.M.E. Harrison, S. Hammond, A. Hawcroft, C. Hay, A.D. |
author_facet | Thornton, H.V. Turner, K.M.E. Harrison, S. Hammond, A. Hawcroft, C. Hay, A.D. |
author_sort | Thornton, H.V. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Microbial point-of-care testing (POCT) has potential to revolutionize clinical care. Understanding the prognostic value of microbes identified from the upper respiratory tract (a convenient sampling site) is a necessary first step to understand potential for upper respiratory tract POCTs in assisting antimicrobial treatment decisions for respiratory infections (RTIs). The aim was to investigate the relationship between upper respiratory tract microbial detection and disease prognosis, including effects of antimicrobial use. METHODS: Data sources were the MEDLINE and Embase databases. Study eligibility criteria consisted of quantitative studies reporting microbiological and prognostic data from patients of all age groups presenting with RTI. Patients presenting to healthcare or research settings with RTI participated. Interventions included upper respiratory tract swab. The methods used were systematic review and meta-analysis. RESULTS: Searches identified 5156 articles, of which 754 were duplicates and 4258 excluded on title or abstract. A total of 144 full texts were screened; 21 articles were retained. Studies reported data for 15 microbes and 26 prognostic measures (390 potential associations). One hundred and seven (27%) associations were investigated statistically, of which 38 (36%) were significant. Most studies reported only prognostic value of test positive results. Meta-analyses suggested hospitalization duration was longer for patients with respiratory syncytial virus than adenovirus and influenza, but significant heterogeneity was observed between studies. CONCLUSIONS: A quarter of potential prognostic associations have been investigated. Of these, a third were significant, suggesting considerable potential for POCT. Future research should investigate prognostic value of positive and negative tests, and interactions between test results, use of antimicrobials and microbial resistance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7129693 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71296932020-04-08 Assessing the potential of upper respiratory tract point-of-care testing: a systematic review of the prognostic significance of upper respiratory tract microbes Thornton, H.V. Turner, K.M.E. Harrison, S. Hammond, A. Hawcroft, C. Hay, A.D. Clin Microbiol Infect Systematic Review OBJECTIVES: Microbial point-of-care testing (POCT) has potential to revolutionize clinical care. Understanding the prognostic value of microbes identified from the upper respiratory tract (a convenient sampling site) is a necessary first step to understand potential for upper respiratory tract POCTs in assisting antimicrobial treatment decisions for respiratory infections (RTIs). The aim was to investigate the relationship between upper respiratory tract microbial detection and disease prognosis, including effects of antimicrobial use. METHODS: Data sources were the MEDLINE and Embase databases. Study eligibility criteria consisted of quantitative studies reporting microbiological and prognostic data from patients of all age groups presenting with RTI. Patients presenting to healthcare or research settings with RTI participated. Interventions included upper respiratory tract swab. The methods used were systematic review and meta-analysis. RESULTS: Searches identified 5156 articles, of which 754 were duplicates and 4258 excluded on title or abstract. A total of 144 full texts were screened; 21 articles were retained. Studies reported data for 15 microbes and 26 prognostic measures (390 potential associations). One hundred and seven (27%) associations were investigated statistically, of which 38 (36%) were significant. Most studies reported only prognostic value of test positive results. Meta-analyses suggested hospitalization duration was longer for patients with respiratory syncytial virus than adenovirus and influenza, but significant heterogeneity was observed between studies. CONCLUSIONS: A quarter of potential prognostic associations have been investigated. Of these, a third were significant, suggesting considerable potential for POCT. Future research should investigate prognostic value of positive and negative tests, and interactions between test results, use of antimicrobials and microbial resistance. European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2019-11 2019-06-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7129693/ /pubmed/31254715 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2019.06.024 Text en © 2019 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Thornton, H.V. Turner, K.M.E. Harrison, S. Hammond, A. Hawcroft, C. Hay, A.D. Assessing the potential of upper respiratory tract point-of-care testing: a systematic review of the prognostic significance of upper respiratory tract microbes |
title | Assessing the potential of upper respiratory tract point-of-care testing: a systematic review of the prognostic significance of upper respiratory tract microbes |
title_full | Assessing the potential of upper respiratory tract point-of-care testing: a systematic review of the prognostic significance of upper respiratory tract microbes |
title_fullStr | Assessing the potential of upper respiratory tract point-of-care testing: a systematic review of the prognostic significance of upper respiratory tract microbes |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessing the potential of upper respiratory tract point-of-care testing: a systematic review of the prognostic significance of upper respiratory tract microbes |
title_short | Assessing the potential of upper respiratory tract point-of-care testing: a systematic review of the prognostic significance of upper respiratory tract microbes |
title_sort | assessing the potential of upper respiratory tract point-of-care testing: a systematic review of the prognostic significance of upper respiratory tract microbes |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7129693/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31254715 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2019.06.024 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT thorntonhv assessingthepotentialofupperrespiratorytractpointofcaretestingasystematicreviewoftheprognosticsignificanceofupperrespiratorytractmicrobes AT turnerkme assessingthepotentialofupperrespiratorytractpointofcaretestingasystematicreviewoftheprognosticsignificanceofupperrespiratorytractmicrobes AT harrisons assessingthepotentialofupperrespiratorytractpointofcaretestingasystematicreviewoftheprognosticsignificanceofupperrespiratorytractmicrobes AT hammonda assessingthepotentialofupperrespiratorytractpointofcaretestingasystematicreviewoftheprognosticsignificanceofupperrespiratorytractmicrobes AT hawcroftc assessingthepotentialofupperrespiratorytractpointofcaretestingasystematicreviewoftheprognosticsignificanceofupperrespiratorytractmicrobes AT hayad assessingthepotentialofupperrespiratorytractpointofcaretestingasystematicreviewoftheprognosticsignificanceofupperrespiratorytractmicrobes |