Cargando…

The effect of smoking on influenza, influenza vaccination efficacy and on the antibody response to influenza vaccination

We examined the relation between cigarette smoking and (1) the occurrence of influenza, (2) the efficacy of influenza vaccination and (3) the antibody response to influenza vaccination in fifteen family practices in South-Limburg, the Netherlands, during the influenza season 1991–1992. Data were use...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cruijff, Mark, Thijs, Carel, Govaert, Theofiel, Aretz, Karin, Dinant, Geert Jan, Knottnerus, André
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Science Ltd. 1999
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7130566/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10073719
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0264-410X(98)00213-8
_version_ 1783517039277637632
author Cruijff, Mark
Thijs, Carel
Govaert, Theofiel
Aretz, Karin
Dinant, Geert Jan
Knottnerus, André
author_facet Cruijff, Mark
Thijs, Carel
Govaert, Theofiel
Aretz, Karin
Dinant, Geert Jan
Knottnerus, André
author_sort Cruijff, Mark
collection PubMed
description We examined the relation between cigarette smoking and (1) the occurrence of influenza, (2) the efficacy of influenza vaccination and (3) the antibody response to influenza vaccination in fifteen family practices in South-Limburg, the Netherlands, during the influenza season 1991–1992. Data were used from a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial into the efficacy of influenza vaccination in which smoking status was measured 10 weeks after the start of the trial. A total of 1838 subjects aged 60 years or older, of whom 1531 subjects (321 smokers, 1152 non-smokers and 58 cigar/pipe smokers) who returned the smoking questionnaire and were not previously vaccinated, were used in the analyses. The main outcome measures were serological influenza (fourfold increase of antibody titre between 3 weeks and 5 months after vaccination); clinical influenza as determined by criteria of the Dutch Sentinel Stations from self reported symptoms in postal questionnaires 10 weeks and 5 months after vaccination; increases after vaccination and decreases after 5 months in logarithmic titres of antibody against the vaccine strains. No relation between smoking and either serological or clinical influenza was found, although the risk for serological influenza was slightly (not significantly) elevated in smokers compared to non-smokers. A statistical interaction was found between smoking and vaccination when serological influenza was the outcome measure indicating that the efficacy of vaccination was greater in smokers than in non-smokers (comparison of model with and without interaction; likelihood ratio test, p<0.0001). This finding is supported by a greater titre rise 3 weeks after vaccination for two out of four strains, but not by the antibody response after vaccination in previous studies on influenza and other infectious diseases. Also, this possible difference of immunogenicity is not reflected in a better protection for clinical influenza. The rise in antibody titre 3 weeks after vaccination was higher in smokers for A/Singapore/6/86 and B/Beijing/11/87, but not for the other two strains. Decline in titres after 5 months was similar for smokers and non-smokers. We conclude that smoking has no clinical or preventive significance for risk of influenza in the elderly.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7130566
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 1999
publisher Elsevier Science Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71305662020-04-08 The effect of smoking on influenza, influenza vaccination efficacy and on the antibody response to influenza vaccination Cruijff, Mark Thijs, Carel Govaert, Theofiel Aretz, Karin Dinant, Geert Jan Knottnerus, André Vaccine Article We examined the relation between cigarette smoking and (1) the occurrence of influenza, (2) the efficacy of influenza vaccination and (3) the antibody response to influenza vaccination in fifteen family practices in South-Limburg, the Netherlands, during the influenza season 1991–1992. Data were used from a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial into the efficacy of influenza vaccination in which smoking status was measured 10 weeks after the start of the trial. A total of 1838 subjects aged 60 years or older, of whom 1531 subjects (321 smokers, 1152 non-smokers and 58 cigar/pipe smokers) who returned the smoking questionnaire and were not previously vaccinated, were used in the analyses. The main outcome measures were serological influenza (fourfold increase of antibody titre between 3 weeks and 5 months after vaccination); clinical influenza as determined by criteria of the Dutch Sentinel Stations from self reported symptoms in postal questionnaires 10 weeks and 5 months after vaccination; increases after vaccination and decreases after 5 months in logarithmic titres of antibody against the vaccine strains. No relation between smoking and either serological or clinical influenza was found, although the risk for serological influenza was slightly (not significantly) elevated in smokers compared to non-smokers. A statistical interaction was found between smoking and vaccination when serological influenza was the outcome measure indicating that the efficacy of vaccination was greater in smokers than in non-smokers (comparison of model with and without interaction; likelihood ratio test, p<0.0001). This finding is supported by a greater titre rise 3 weeks after vaccination for two out of four strains, but not by the antibody response after vaccination in previous studies on influenza and other infectious diseases. Also, this possible difference of immunogenicity is not reflected in a better protection for clinical influenza. The rise in antibody titre 3 weeks after vaccination was higher in smokers for A/Singapore/6/86 and B/Beijing/11/87, but not for the other two strains. Decline in titres after 5 months was similar for smokers and non-smokers. We conclude that smoking has no clinical or preventive significance for risk of influenza in the elderly. Elsevier Science Ltd. 1999-02 1999-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7130566/ /pubmed/10073719 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0264-410X(98)00213-8 Text en Copyright © 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Cruijff, Mark
Thijs, Carel
Govaert, Theofiel
Aretz, Karin
Dinant, Geert Jan
Knottnerus, André
The effect of smoking on influenza, influenza vaccination efficacy and on the antibody response to influenza vaccination
title The effect of smoking on influenza, influenza vaccination efficacy and on the antibody response to influenza vaccination
title_full The effect of smoking on influenza, influenza vaccination efficacy and on the antibody response to influenza vaccination
title_fullStr The effect of smoking on influenza, influenza vaccination efficacy and on the antibody response to influenza vaccination
title_full_unstemmed The effect of smoking on influenza, influenza vaccination efficacy and on the antibody response to influenza vaccination
title_short The effect of smoking on influenza, influenza vaccination efficacy and on the antibody response to influenza vaccination
title_sort effect of smoking on influenza, influenza vaccination efficacy and on the antibody response to influenza vaccination
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7130566/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10073719
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0264-410X(98)00213-8
work_keys_str_mv AT cruijffmark theeffectofsmokingoninfluenzainfluenzavaccinationefficacyandontheantibodyresponsetoinfluenzavaccination
AT thijscarel theeffectofsmokingoninfluenzainfluenzavaccinationefficacyandontheantibodyresponsetoinfluenzavaccination
AT govaerttheofiel theeffectofsmokingoninfluenzainfluenzavaccinationefficacyandontheantibodyresponsetoinfluenzavaccination
AT aretzkarin theeffectofsmokingoninfluenzainfluenzavaccinationefficacyandontheantibodyresponsetoinfluenzavaccination
AT dinantgeertjan theeffectofsmokingoninfluenzainfluenzavaccinationefficacyandontheantibodyresponsetoinfluenzavaccination
AT knottnerusandre theeffectofsmokingoninfluenzainfluenzavaccinationefficacyandontheantibodyresponsetoinfluenzavaccination
AT cruijffmark effectofsmokingoninfluenzainfluenzavaccinationefficacyandontheantibodyresponsetoinfluenzavaccination
AT thijscarel effectofsmokingoninfluenzainfluenzavaccinationefficacyandontheantibodyresponsetoinfluenzavaccination
AT govaerttheofiel effectofsmokingoninfluenzainfluenzavaccinationefficacyandontheantibodyresponsetoinfluenzavaccination
AT aretzkarin effectofsmokingoninfluenzainfluenzavaccinationefficacyandontheantibodyresponsetoinfluenzavaccination
AT dinantgeertjan effectofsmokingoninfluenzainfluenzavaccinationefficacyandontheantibodyresponsetoinfluenzavaccination
AT knottnerusandre effectofsmokingoninfluenzainfluenzavaccinationefficacyandontheantibodyresponsetoinfluenzavaccination