Cargando…

Multiphase CT-based prediction of Child-Pugh classification: a machine learning approach

BACKGROUND: To evaluate whether machine learning algorithms allow the prediction of Child-Pugh classification on clinical multiphase computed tomography (CT). METHODS: A total of 259 patients who underwent diagnostic abdominal CT (unenhanced, contrast-enhanced arterial, and venous phases) were inclu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thüring, Johannes, Rippel, Oliver, Haarburger, Christoph, Merhof, Dorit, Schad, Philipp, Bruners, Philipp, Kuhl, Christiane K., Truhn, Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7131973/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32249336
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41747-020-00148-3
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: To evaluate whether machine learning algorithms allow the prediction of Child-Pugh classification on clinical multiphase computed tomography (CT). METHODS: A total of 259 patients who underwent diagnostic abdominal CT (unenhanced, contrast-enhanced arterial, and venous phases) were included in this retrospective study. Child-Pugh scores were determined based on laboratory and clinical parameters. Linear regression (LR), Random Forest (RF), and convolutional neural network (CNN) algorithms were used to predict the Child-Pugh class. Their performances were compared to the prediction of experienced radiologists (ERs). Spearman correlation coefficients and accuracy were assessed for all predictive models. Additionally, a binary classification in low disease severity (Child-Pugh class A) and advanced disease severity (Child-Pugh class ≥ B) was performed. RESULTS: Eleven imaging features exhibited a significant correlation when adjusted for multiple comparisons with Child-Pugh class. Significant correlations between predicted and measured Child-Pugh classes were observed (ρ(LA) = 0.35, ρ(RF) = 0.32, ρ(CNN) = 0.51, ρ(ERs) = 0.60; p < 0.001). Significantly better accuracies for the prediction of Child-Pugh classes versus no-information rate were found for CNN and ERs (p ≤ 0.034), not for LR and RF (p ≥ 0.384). For binary severity classification, the area under the curve at receiver operating characteristic analysis was significantly lower (p ≤ 0.042) for LR (0.71) and RF (0.69) than for CNN (0.80) and ERs (0.76), without significant differences between CNN and ERs (p = 0.144). CONCLUSIONS: The performance of a CNN in assessing Child-Pugh class based on multiphase abdominal CT images is comparable to that of ERs.