Cargando…

Multiphase CT-based prediction of Child-Pugh classification: a machine learning approach

BACKGROUND: To evaluate whether machine learning algorithms allow the prediction of Child-Pugh classification on clinical multiphase computed tomography (CT). METHODS: A total of 259 patients who underwent diagnostic abdominal CT (unenhanced, contrast-enhanced arterial, and venous phases) were inclu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thüring, Johannes, Rippel, Oliver, Haarburger, Christoph, Merhof, Dorit, Schad, Philipp, Bruners, Philipp, Kuhl, Christiane K., Truhn, Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7131973/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32249336
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41747-020-00148-3
_version_ 1783517355515576320
author Thüring, Johannes
Rippel, Oliver
Haarburger, Christoph
Merhof, Dorit
Schad, Philipp
Bruners, Philipp
Kuhl, Christiane K.
Truhn, Daniel
author_facet Thüring, Johannes
Rippel, Oliver
Haarburger, Christoph
Merhof, Dorit
Schad, Philipp
Bruners, Philipp
Kuhl, Christiane K.
Truhn, Daniel
author_sort Thüring, Johannes
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To evaluate whether machine learning algorithms allow the prediction of Child-Pugh classification on clinical multiphase computed tomography (CT). METHODS: A total of 259 patients who underwent diagnostic abdominal CT (unenhanced, contrast-enhanced arterial, and venous phases) were included in this retrospective study. Child-Pugh scores were determined based on laboratory and clinical parameters. Linear regression (LR), Random Forest (RF), and convolutional neural network (CNN) algorithms were used to predict the Child-Pugh class. Their performances were compared to the prediction of experienced radiologists (ERs). Spearman correlation coefficients and accuracy were assessed for all predictive models. Additionally, a binary classification in low disease severity (Child-Pugh class A) and advanced disease severity (Child-Pugh class ≥ B) was performed. RESULTS: Eleven imaging features exhibited a significant correlation when adjusted for multiple comparisons with Child-Pugh class. Significant correlations between predicted and measured Child-Pugh classes were observed (ρ(LA) = 0.35, ρ(RF) = 0.32, ρ(CNN) = 0.51, ρ(ERs) = 0.60; p < 0.001). Significantly better accuracies for the prediction of Child-Pugh classes versus no-information rate were found for CNN and ERs (p ≤ 0.034), not for LR and RF (p ≥ 0.384). For binary severity classification, the area under the curve at receiver operating characteristic analysis was significantly lower (p ≤ 0.042) for LR (0.71) and RF (0.69) than for CNN (0.80) and ERs (0.76), without significant differences between CNN and ERs (p = 0.144). CONCLUSIONS: The performance of a CNN in assessing Child-Pugh class based on multiphase abdominal CT images is comparable to that of ERs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7131973
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71319732020-04-09 Multiphase CT-based prediction of Child-Pugh classification: a machine learning approach Thüring, Johannes Rippel, Oliver Haarburger, Christoph Merhof, Dorit Schad, Philipp Bruners, Philipp Kuhl, Christiane K. Truhn, Daniel Eur Radiol Exp Original Article BACKGROUND: To evaluate whether machine learning algorithms allow the prediction of Child-Pugh classification on clinical multiphase computed tomography (CT). METHODS: A total of 259 patients who underwent diagnostic abdominal CT (unenhanced, contrast-enhanced arterial, and venous phases) were included in this retrospective study. Child-Pugh scores were determined based on laboratory and clinical parameters. Linear regression (LR), Random Forest (RF), and convolutional neural network (CNN) algorithms were used to predict the Child-Pugh class. Their performances were compared to the prediction of experienced radiologists (ERs). Spearman correlation coefficients and accuracy were assessed for all predictive models. Additionally, a binary classification in low disease severity (Child-Pugh class A) and advanced disease severity (Child-Pugh class ≥ B) was performed. RESULTS: Eleven imaging features exhibited a significant correlation when adjusted for multiple comparisons with Child-Pugh class. Significant correlations between predicted and measured Child-Pugh classes were observed (ρ(LA) = 0.35, ρ(RF) = 0.32, ρ(CNN) = 0.51, ρ(ERs) = 0.60; p < 0.001). Significantly better accuracies for the prediction of Child-Pugh classes versus no-information rate were found for CNN and ERs (p ≤ 0.034), not for LR and RF (p ≥ 0.384). For binary severity classification, the area under the curve at receiver operating characteristic analysis was significantly lower (p ≤ 0.042) for LR (0.71) and RF (0.69) than for CNN (0.80) and ERs (0.76), without significant differences between CNN and ERs (p = 0.144). CONCLUSIONS: The performance of a CNN in assessing Child-Pugh class based on multiphase abdominal CT images is comparable to that of ERs. Springer International Publishing 2020-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7131973/ /pubmed/32249336 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41747-020-00148-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Thüring, Johannes
Rippel, Oliver
Haarburger, Christoph
Merhof, Dorit
Schad, Philipp
Bruners, Philipp
Kuhl, Christiane K.
Truhn, Daniel
Multiphase CT-based prediction of Child-Pugh classification: a machine learning approach
title Multiphase CT-based prediction of Child-Pugh classification: a machine learning approach
title_full Multiphase CT-based prediction of Child-Pugh classification: a machine learning approach
title_fullStr Multiphase CT-based prediction of Child-Pugh classification: a machine learning approach
title_full_unstemmed Multiphase CT-based prediction of Child-Pugh classification: a machine learning approach
title_short Multiphase CT-based prediction of Child-Pugh classification: a machine learning approach
title_sort multiphase ct-based prediction of child-pugh classification: a machine learning approach
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7131973/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32249336
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41747-020-00148-3
work_keys_str_mv AT thuringjohannes multiphasectbasedpredictionofchildpughclassificationamachinelearningapproach
AT rippeloliver multiphasectbasedpredictionofchildpughclassificationamachinelearningapproach
AT haarburgerchristoph multiphasectbasedpredictionofchildpughclassificationamachinelearningapproach
AT merhofdorit multiphasectbasedpredictionofchildpughclassificationamachinelearningapproach
AT schadphilipp multiphasectbasedpredictionofchildpughclassificationamachinelearningapproach
AT brunersphilipp multiphasectbasedpredictionofchildpughclassificationamachinelearningapproach
AT kuhlchristianek multiphasectbasedpredictionofchildpughclassificationamachinelearningapproach
AT truhndaniel multiphasectbasedpredictionofchildpughclassificationamachinelearningapproach