Cargando…

A little history goes a long way toward understanding why we study consciousness the way we do today

Consciousness is currently a thriving area of research in psychology and neuroscience. While this is often attributed to events that took place in the early 1990s, consciousness studies today are a continuation of research that started in the late 19th century and that continued throughout the 20th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: LeDoux, Joseph E., Michel, Matthias, Lau, Hakwan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: National Academy of Sciences 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7132279/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32170012
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1921623117
_version_ 1783517410563719168
author LeDoux, Joseph E.
Michel, Matthias
Lau, Hakwan
author_facet LeDoux, Joseph E.
Michel, Matthias
Lau, Hakwan
author_sort LeDoux, Joseph E.
collection PubMed
description Consciousness is currently a thriving area of research in psychology and neuroscience. While this is often attributed to events that took place in the early 1990s, consciousness studies today are a continuation of research that started in the late 19th century and that continued throughout the 20th century. From the beginning, the effort built on studies of animals to reveal basic principles of brain organization and function, and of human patients to gain clues about consciousness itself. Particularly important and our focus here is research in the 1950s, 1960s, and 1970s involving three groups of patients—amnesia, split brain, and blindsight. Across all three groups, a similar pattern of results was found—the patients could respond appropriately to stimuli that they denied seeing (or in the case of amnesiacs, having seen before). These studies paved the way for the current wave of research on consciousness. The field is, in fact, still grappling with the implications of the findings showing that the ability to consciously know and report the identity of a visual stimulus can be dissociated in the brain from the mechanisms that underlie the ability to behave in a meaningful way to the same stimulus.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7132279
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher National Academy of Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71322792020-04-09 A little history goes a long way toward understanding why we study consciousness the way we do today LeDoux, Joseph E. Michel, Matthias Lau, Hakwan Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Perspective Consciousness is currently a thriving area of research in psychology and neuroscience. While this is often attributed to events that took place in the early 1990s, consciousness studies today are a continuation of research that started in the late 19th century and that continued throughout the 20th century. From the beginning, the effort built on studies of animals to reveal basic principles of brain organization and function, and of human patients to gain clues about consciousness itself. Particularly important and our focus here is research in the 1950s, 1960s, and 1970s involving three groups of patients—amnesia, split brain, and blindsight. Across all three groups, a similar pattern of results was found—the patients could respond appropriately to stimuli that they denied seeing (or in the case of amnesiacs, having seen before). These studies paved the way for the current wave of research on consciousness. The field is, in fact, still grappling with the implications of the findings showing that the ability to consciously know and report the identity of a visual stimulus can be dissociated in the brain from the mechanisms that underlie the ability to behave in a meaningful way to the same stimulus. National Academy of Sciences 2020-03-31 2020-03-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7132279/ /pubmed/32170012 http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1921623117 Text en Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by PNAS. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This open access article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC BY) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Perspective
LeDoux, Joseph E.
Michel, Matthias
Lau, Hakwan
A little history goes a long way toward understanding why we study consciousness the way we do today
title A little history goes a long way toward understanding why we study consciousness the way we do today
title_full A little history goes a long way toward understanding why we study consciousness the way we do today
title_fullStr A little history goes a long way toward understanding why we study consciousness the way we do today
title_full_unstemmed A little history goes a long way toward understanding why we study consciousness the way we do today
title_short A little history goes a long way toward understanding why we study consciousness the way we do today
title_sort little history goes a long way toward understanding why we study consciousness the way we do today
topic Perspective
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7132279/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32170012
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1921623117
work_keys_str_mv AT ledouxjosephe alittlehistorygoesalongwaytowardunderstandingwhywestudyconsciousnessthewaywedotoday
AT michelmatthias alittlehistorygoesalongwaytowardunderstandingwhywestudyconsciousnessthewaywedotoday
AT lauhakwan alittlehistorygoesalongwaytowardunderstandingwhywestudyconsciousnessthewaywedotoday
AT ledouxjosephe littlehistorygoesalongwaytowardunderstandingwhywestudyconsciousnessthewaywedotoday
AT michelmatthias littlehistorygoesalongwaytowardunderstandingwhywestudyconsciousnessthewaywedotoday
AT lauhakwan littlehistorygoesalongwaytowardunderstandingwhywestudyconsciousnessthewaywedotoday