Cargando…

Predictive value of the user seal check in determining half-face respirator fit

Guidelines issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the World Health Organization state that healthcare workers should wear N95 masks or higher-level protection during all contact with suspected cases of severe acute respiratory syndrome. Before use, the manufacturer recommends p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Derrick, J.L., Chan, Y.F., Gomersall, C.D., Lui, S.F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Hospital Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2005
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7132529/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15620450
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2004.09.009
_version_ 1783517457827233792
author Derrick, J.L.
Chan, Y.F.
Gomersall, C.D.
Lui, S.F.
author_facet Derrick, J.L.
Chan, Y.F.
Gomersall, C.D.
Lui, S.F.
author_sort Derrick, J.L.
collection PubMed
description Guidelines issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the World Health Organization state that healthcare workers should wear N95 masks or higher-level protection during all contact with suspected cases of severe acute respiratory syndrome. Before use, the manufacturer recommends performing a user seal check to ensure that the mask is fitted correctly. This study aimed to test the ability of the user seal check to detect poorly fitting masks. This study is a retrospective review of a mask-fitting programme carried out in the intensive care unit of the Prince of Wales Hospital in Hong Kong. In this programme, all staff were tested with two types of N95 mask and one type of N100 mask. The results of the documented user seal check were then compared with the formal fit-test results from a PortaCount. Using a PortaCount reading of 100 as the criterion for a correctly fitted mask, the user seal check wrongly indicated that the mask fitted on 18–31% of occasions, and wrongly indicated that it did not fit on 21–40% of occasions. These data indicate that the user seal check should not be used as a surrogate fit test. Its usefulness as a pre-use test must also be questioned.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7132529
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2005
publisher The Hospital Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71325292020-04-08 Predictive value of the user seal check in determining half-face respirator fit Derrick, J.L. Chan, Y.F. Gomersall, C.D. Lui, S.F. J Hosp Infect Article Guidelines issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the World Health Organization state that healthcare workers should wear N95 masks or higher-level protection during all contact with suspected cases of severe acute respiratory syndrome. Before use, the manufacturer recommends performing a user seal check to ensure that the mask is fitted correctly. This study aimed to test the ability of the user seal check to detect poorly fitting masks. This study is a retrospective review of a mask-fitting programme carried out in the intensive care unit of the Prince of Wales Hospital in Hong Kong. In this programme, all staff were tested with two types of N95 mask and one type of N100 mask. The results of the documented user seal check were then compared with the formal fit-test results from a PortaCount. Using a PortaCount reading of 100 as the criterion for a correctly fitted mask, the user seal check wrongly indicated that the mask fitted on 18–31% of occasions, and wrongly indicated that it did not fit on 21–40% of occasions. These data indicate that the user seal check should not be used as a surrogate fit test. Its usefulness as a pre-use test must also be questioned. The Hospital Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2005-02 2004-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7132529/ /pubmed/15620450 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2004.09.009 Text en Copyright © 2004 The Hospital Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Derrick, J.L.
Chan, Y.F.
Gomersall, C.D.
Lui, S.F.
Predictive value of the user seal check in determining half-face respirator fit
title Predictive value of the user seal check in determining half-face respirator fit
title_full Predictive value of the user seal check in determining half-face respirator fit
title_fullStr Predictive value of the user seal check in determining half-face respirator fit
title_full_unstemmed Predictive value of the user seal check in determining half-face respirator fit
title_short Predictive value of the user seal check in determining half-face respirator fit
title_sort predictive value of the user seal check in determining half-face respirator fit
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7132529/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15620450
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2004.09.009
work_keys_str_mv AT derrickjl predictivevalueoftheusersealcheckindetermininghalffacerespiratorfit
AT chanyf predictivevalueoftheusersealcheckindetermininghalffacerespiratorfit
AT gomersallcd predictivevalueoftheusersealcheckindetermininghalffacerespiratorfit
AT luisf predictivevalueoftheusersealcheckindetermininghalffacerespiratorfit