Cargando…
Predictive value of the user seal check in determining half-face respirator fit
Guidelines issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the World Health Organization state that healthcare workers should wear N95 masks or higher-level protection during all contact with suspected cases of severe acute respiratory syndrome. Before use, the manufacturer recommends p...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Hospital Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
2005
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7132529/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15620450 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2004.09.009 |
_version_ | 1783517457827233792 |
---|---|
author | Derrick, J.L. Chan, Y.F. Gomersall, C.D. Lui, S.F. |
author_facet | Derrick, J.L. Chan, Y.F. Gomersall, C.D. Lui, S.F. |
author_sort | Derrick, J.L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Guidelines issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the World Health Organization state that healthcare workers should wear N95 masks or higher-level protection during all contact with suspected cases of severe acute respiratory syndrome. Before use, the manufacturer recommends performing a user seal check to ensure that the mask is fitted correctly. This study aimed to test the ability of the user seal check to detect poorly fitting masks. This study is a retrospective review of a mask-fitting programme carried out in the intensive care unit of the Prince of Wales Hospital in Hong Kong. In this programme, all staff were tested with two types of N95 mask and one type of N100 mask. The results of the documented user seal check were then compared with the formal fit-test results from a PortaCount. Using a PortaCount reading of 100 as the criterion for a correctly fitted mask, the user seal check wrongly indicated that the mask fitted on 18–31% of occasions, and wrongly indicated that it did not fit on 21–40% of occasions. These data indicate that the user seal check should not be used as a surrogate fit test. Its usefulness as a pre-use test must also be questioned. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7132529 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2005 |
publisher | The Hospital Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71325292020-04-08 Predictive value of the user seal check in determining half-face respirator fit Derrick, J.L. Chan, Y.F. Gomersall, C.D. Lui, S.F. J Hosp Infect Article Guidelines issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the World Health Organization state that healthcare workers should wear N95 masks or higher-level protection during all contact with suspected cases of severe acute respiratory syndrome. Before use, the manufacturer recommends performing a user seal check to ensure that the mask is fitted correctly. This study aimed to test the ability of the user seal check to detect poorly fitting masks. This study is a retrospective review of a mask-fitting programme carried out in the intensive care unit of the Prince of Wales Hospital in Hong Kong. In this programme, all staff were tested with two types of N95 mask and one type of N100 mask. The results of the documented user seal check were then compared with the formal fit-test results from a PortaCount. Using a PortaCount reading of 100 as the criterion for a correctly fitted mask, the user seal check wrongly indicated that the mask fitted on 18–31% of occasions, and wrongly indicated that it did not fit on 21–40% of occasions. These data indicate that the user seal check should not be used as a surrogate fit test. Its usefulness as a pre-use test must also be questioned. The Hospital Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2005-02 2004-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7132529/ /pubmed/15620450 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2004.09.009 Text en Copyright © 2004 The Hospital Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Derrick, J.L. Chan, Y.F. Gomersall, C.D. Lui, S.F. Predictive value of the user seal check in determining half-face respirator fit |
title | Predictive value of the user seal check in determining half-face respirator fit |
title_full | Predictive value of the user seal check in determining half-face respirator fit |
title_fullStr | Predictive value of the user seal check in determining half-face respirator fit |
title_full_unstemmed | Predictive value of the user seal check in determining half-face respirator fit |
title_short | Predictive value of the user seal check in determining half-face respirator fit |
title_sort | predictive value of the user seal check in determining half-face respirator fit |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7132529/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15620450 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2004.09.009 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT derrickjl predictivevalueoftheusersealcheckindetermininghalffacerespiratorfit AT chanyf predictivevalueoftheusersealcheckindetermininghalffacerespiratorfit AT gomersallcd predictivevalueoftheusersealcheckindetermininghalffacerespiratorfit AT luisf predictivevalueoftheusersealcheckindetermininghalffacerespiratorfit |