Cargando…

Dalbavancin versus standard of care for the treatment of osteomyelitis in adults: A retrospective matched cohort study

OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety and effectiveness of dalbavancin compared to standard of care (SOC) in the treatment of osteomyelitis in adults. METHOD: A retrospective cohort study of patients with osteomyelitis due to S. aureus treated with dalbavancin was conducted. Patients who received at least...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Almangour, Thamer A., Perry, Gregory K., Alhifany, Abdullah A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7132597/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32273805
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsps.2020.02.007
_version_ 1783517471802654720
author Almangour, Thamer A.
Perry, Gregory K.
Alhifany, Abdullah A.
author_facet Almangour, Thamer A.
Perry, Gregory K.
Alhifany, Abdullah A.
author_sort Almangour, Thamer A.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety and effectiveness of dalbavancin compared to standard of care (SOC) in the treatment of osteomyelitis in adults. METHOD: A retrospective cohort study of patients with osteomyelitis due to S. aureus treated with dalbavancin was conducted. Patients who received at least 2 doses of dalbavancin for the treatment of osteomyelitis between January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2018 in a single center in Texas, USA were identified and matched in 1:1 ratio with controls who received SOC. The primary efficacy outcome was the clinical success at the end of treatment. Secondary efficacy outcome was the clinical success continued for at least 3 months after the completion of the antimicrobial therapy. RESULTS: During study period, 21 patients received dalbavancin for the treatment of osteomyelitis; however, only 11 patients were eligible for inclusion and matched to 11 others who received SOC. Primary outcome was achieved in all 11 patients who received dalbavancin and all those patients subsequently attained the secondary outcome. In SOC group, primary outcome occurred in 82% (9/11) of patients in which 8 out of 9 patients subsequently achieved the secondary outcome. No adverse reaction noted in either group. CONCLUSION: Dalbavancin appears to be safe and effective for the management of osteomyelitis in adults. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7132597
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71325972020-04-09 Dalbavancin versus standard of care for the treatment of osteomyelitis in adults: A retrospective matched cohort study Almangour, Thamer A. Perry, Gregory K. Alhifany, Abdullah A. Saudi Pharm J Article OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety and effectiveness of dalbavancin compared to standard of care (SOC) in the treatment of osteomyelitis in adults. METHOD: A retrospective cohort study of patients with osteomyelitis due to S. aureus treated with dalbavancin was conducted. Patients who received at least 2 doses of dalbavancin for the treatment of osteomyelitis between January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2018 in a single center in Texas, USA were identified and matched in 1:1 ratio with controls who received SOC. The primary efficacy outcome was the clinical success at the end of treatment. Secondary efficacy outcome was the clinical success continued for at least 3 months after the completion of the antimicrobial therapy. RESULTS: During study period, 21 patients received dalbavancin for the treatment of osteomyelitis; however, only 11 patients were eligible for inclusion and matched to 11 others who received SOC. Primary outcome was achieved in all 11 patients who received dalbavancin and all those patients subsequently attained the secondary outcome. In SOC group, primary outcome occurred in 82% (9/11) of patients in which 8 out of 9 patients subsequently achieved the secondary outcome. No adverse reaction noted in either group. CONCLUSION: Dalbavancin appears to be safe and effective for the management of osteomyelitis in adults. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings. Elsevier 2020-04 2020-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7132597/ /pubmed/32273805 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsps.2020.02.007 Text en © 2020 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Almangour, Thamer A.
Perry, Gregory K.
Alhifany, Abdullah A.
Dalbavancin versus standard of care for the treatment of osteomyelitis in adults: A retrospective matched cohort study
title Dalbavancin versus standard of care for the treatment of osteomyelitis in adults: A retrospective matched cohort study
title_full Dalbavancin versus standard of care for the treatment of osteomyelitis in adults: A retrospective matched cohort study
title_fullStr Dalbavancin versus standard of care for the treatment of osteomyelitis in adults: A retrospective matched cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Dalbavancin versus standard of care for the treatment of osteomyelitis in adults: A retrospective matched cohort study
title_short Dalbavancin versus standard of care for the treatment of osteomyelitis in adults: A retrospective matched cohort study
title_sort dalbavancin versus standard of care for the treatment of osteomyelitis in adults: a retrospective matched cohort study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7132597/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32273805
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsps.2020.02.007
work_keys_str_mv AT almangourthamera dalbavancinversusstandardofcareforthetreatmentofosteomyelitisinadultsaretrospectivematchedcohortstudy
AT perrygregoryk dalbavancinversusstandardofcareforthetreatmentofosteomyelitisinadultsaretrospectivematchedcohortstudy
AT alhifanyabdullaha dalbavancinversusstandardofcareforthetreatmentofosteomyelitisinadultsaretrospectivematchedcohortstudy