Cargando…
Comparison of Cepheid® Xpert Flu and Roche RealTime Ready Influenza A/H1N1 Detection Set for detection of influenza A/H1N1
OBJECTIVE: To compare two influenza polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods. METHODS: A total of 749 suspected MERS-CoV patients presenting at Johns Hopkins Aramco Healthcare, Saudi Arabia, each submitted a clinical sample for influenza A reflex testing using the on-site Cepheid® Xpert Flu assay and...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7132748/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29329754 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2017.12.010 |
_version_ | 1783517498664026112 |
---|---|
author | Rabaan, Ali A. Bazzi, Ali M. Alshaikh, Sana A. |
author_facet | Rabaan, Ali A. Bazzi, Ali M. Alshaikh, Sana A. |
author_sort | Rabaan, Ali A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To compare two influenza polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods. METHODS: A total of 749 suspected MERS-CoV patients presenting at Johns Hopkins Aramco Healthcare, Saudi Arabia, each submitted a clinical sample for influenza A reflex testing using the on-site Cepheid® Xpert Flu assay and at the Ministry of Health laboratory by the Roche PCR assay. RESULTS: There was 92.12% overall agreement between the two methods. Specificity of the Cepheid® Xpert Flu was 95.8% for H1N1 and 94.4% for total influenza A. Cepheid® Xpert Flu sensitivity for influenza A was 100% for younger patients (0–19-year age group) but significantly lower both for older patients (68.2% for 60–79-year and 50% for ≥80-year age groups) and overall for males compared to females (72.6% and 94.0%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Specificity of the Cepheid® Xpert Flu test was high; however, sensitivity for total influenza A was lower particularly in males and older patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7132748 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Elsevier Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71327482020-04-08 Comparison of Cepheid® Xpert Flu and Roche RealTime Ready Influenza A/H1N1 Detection Set for detection of influenza A/H1N1 Rabaan, Ali A. Bazzi, Ali M. Alshaikh, Sana A. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis Article OBJECTIVE: To compare two influenza polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods. METHODS: A total of 749 suspected MERS-CoV patients presenting at Johns Hopkins Aramco Healthcare, Saudi Arabia, each submitted a clinical sample for influenza A reflex testing using the on-site Cepheid® Xpert Flu assay and at the Ministry of Health laboratory by the Roche PCR assay. RESULTS: There was 92.12% overall agreement between the two methods. Specificity of the Cepheid® Xpert Flu was 95.8% for H1N1 and 94.4% for total influenza A. Cepheid® Xpert Flu sensitivity for influenza A was 100% for younger patients (0–19-year age group) but significantly lower both for older patients (68.2% for 60–79-year and 50% for ≥80-year age groups) and overall for males compared to females (72.6% and 94.0%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Specificity of the Cepheid® Xpert Flu test was high; however, sensitivity for total influenza A was lower particularly in males and older patients. Elsevier Inc. 2018-04 2017-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7132748/ /pubmed/29329754 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2017.12.010 Text en © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Rabaan, Ali A. Bazzi, Ali M. Alshaikh, Sana A. Comparison of Cepheid® Xpert Flu and Roche RealTime Ready Influenza A/H1N1 Detection Set for detection of influenza A/H1N1 |
title | Comparison of Cepheid® Xpert Flu and Roche RealTime Ready Influenza A/H1N1 Detection Set for detection of influenza A/H1N1 |
title_full | Comparison of Cepheid® Xpert Flu and Roche RealTime Ready Influenza A/H1N1 Detection Set for detection of influenza A/H1N1 |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Cepheid® Xpert Flu and Roche RealTime Ready Influenza A/H1N1 Detection Set for detection of influenza A/H1N1 |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Cepheid® Xpert Flu and Roche RealTime Ready Influenza A/H1N1 Detection Set for detection of influenza A/H1N1 |
title_short | Comparison of Cepheid® Xpert Flu and Roche RealTime Ready Influenza A/H1N1 Detection Set for detection of influenza A/H1N1 |
title_sort | comparison of cepheid® xpert flu and roche realtime ready influenza a/h1n1 detection set for detection of influenza a/h1n1 |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7132748/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29329754 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2017.12.010 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rabaanalia comparisonofcepheidxpertfluandrocherealtimereadyinfluenzaah1n1detectionsetfordetectionofinfluenzaah1n1 AT bazzialim comparisonofcepheidxpertfluandrocherealtimereadyinfluenzaah1n1detectionsetfordetectionofinfluenzaah1n1 AT alshaikhsanaa comparisonofcepheidxpertfluandrocherealtimereadyinfluenzaah1n1detectionsetfordetectionofinfluenzaah1n1 |