Cargando…

Co-expression vs. co-infection using baculovirus expression vectors in insect cell culture: Benefits and drawbacks

The baculovirus expression vector system (BEVS) is a versatile and powerful platform for protein expression in insect cells. With the ability to approach similar post-translational modifications as in mammalian cells, the BEVS offers a number of advantages including high levels of expression as well...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sokolenko, Stanislav, George, Steve, Wagner, Andreas, Tuladhar, Anup, Andrich, Jonas M.S., Aucoin, Marc G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Inc. 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7132753/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22297133
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2012.01.009
_version_ 1783517499892957184
author Sokolenko, Stanislav
George, Steve
Wagner, Andreas
Tuladhar, Anup
Andrich, Jonas M.S.
Aucoin, Marc G.
author_facet Sokolenko, Stanislav
George, Steve
Wagner, Andreas
Tuladhar, Anup
Andrich, Jonas M.S.
Aucoin, Marc G.
author_sort Sokolenko, Stanislav
collection PubMed
description The baculovirus expression vector system (BEVS) is a versatile and powerful platform for protein expression in insect cells. With the ability to approach similar post-translational modifications as in mammalian cells, the BEVS offers a number of advantages including high levels of expression as well as an inherent safety during manufacture and of the final product. Many BEVS products include proteins and protein complexes that require expression from more than one gene. This review examines the expression strategies that have been used to this end and focuses on the distinguishing features between those that make use of single polycistronic baculovirus (co-expression) and those that use multiple monocistronic baculoviruses (co-infection). Three major areas in which researchers have been able to take advantage of co-expression/co-infection are addressed, including compound structure-function studies, insect cell functionality augmentation, and VLP production. The core of the review discusses the parameters of interest for co-infection and co-expression with time of infection (TOI) and multiplicity of infection (MOI) highlighted for the former and the choice of promoter for the latter. In addition, an overview of modeling approaches is presented, with a suggested trajectory for future exploration. The review concludes with an examination of the gaps that still remain in co-expression/co-infection knowledge and practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7132753
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Elsevier Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71327532020-04-08 Co-expression vs. co-infection using baculovirus expression vectors in insect cell culture: Benefits and drawbacks Sokolenko, Stanislav George, Steve Wagner, Andreas Tuladhar, Anup Andrich, Jonas M.S. Aucoin, Marc G. Biotechnol Adv Article The baculovirus expression vector system (BEVS) is a versatile and powerful platform for protein expression in insect cells. With the ability to approach similar post-translational modifications as in mammalian cells, the BEVS offers a number of advantages including high levels of expression as well as an inherent safety during manufacture and of the final product. Many BEVS products include proteins and protein complexes that require expression from more than one gene. This review examines the expression strategies that have been used to this end and focuses on the distinguishing features between those that make use of single polycistronic baculovirus (co-expression) and those that use multiple monocistronic baculoviruses (co-infection). Three major areas in which researchers have been able to take advantage of co-expression/co-infection are addressed, including compound structure-function studies, insect cell functionality augmentation, and VLP production. The core of the review discusses the parameters of interest for co-infection and co-expression with time of infection (TOI) and multiplicity of infection (MOI) highlighted for the former and the choice of promoter for the latter. In addition, an overview of modeling approaches is presented, with a suggested trajectory for future exploration. The review concludes with an examination of the gaps that still remain in co-expression/co-infection knowledge and practice. Elsevier Inc. 2012 2012-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7132753/ /pubmed/22297133 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2012.01.009 Text en Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Sokolenko, Stanislav
George, Steve
Wagner, Andreas
Tuladhar, Anup
Andrich, Jonas M.S.
Aucoin, Marc G.
Co-expression vs. co-infection using baculovirus expression vectors in insect cell culture: Benefits and drawbacks
title Co-expression vs. co-infection using baculovirus expression vectors in insect cell culture: Benefits and drawbacks
title_full Co-expression vs. co-infection using baculovirus expression vectors in insect cell culture: Benefits and drawbacks
title_fullStr Co-expression vs. co-infection using baculovirus expression vectors in insect cell culture: Benefits and drawbacks
title_full_unstemmed Co-expression vs. co-infection using baculovirus expression vectors in insect cell culture: Benefits and drawbacks
title_short Co-expression vs. co-infection using baculovirus expression vectors in insect cell culture: Benefits and drawbacks
title_sort co-expression vs. co-infection using baculovirus expression vectors in insect cell culture: benefits and drawbacks
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7132753/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22297133
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2012.01.009
work_keys_str_mv AT sokolenkostanislav coexpressionvscoinfectionusingbaculovirusexpressionvectorsininsectcellculturebenefitsanddrawbacks
AT georgesteve coexpressionvscoinfectionusingbaculovirusexpressionvectorsininsectcellculturebenefitsanddrawbacks
AT wagnerandreas coexpressionvscoinfectionusingbaculovirusexpressionvectorsininsectcellculturebenefitsanddrawbacks
AT tuladharanup coexpressionvscoinfectionusingbaculovirusexpressionvectorsininsectcellculturebenefitsanddrawbacks
AT andrichjonasms coexpressionvscoinfectionusingbaculovirusexpressionvectorsininsectcellculturebenefitsanddrawbacks
AT aucoinmarcg coexpressionvscoinfectionusingbaculovirusexpressionvectorsininsectcellculturebenefitsanddrawbacks