Cargando…
Co-expression vs. co-infection using baculovirus expression vectors in insect cell culture: Benefits and drawbacks
The baculovirus expression vector system (BEVS) is a versatile and powerful platform for protein expression in insect cells. With the ability to approach similar post-translational modifications as in mammalian cells, the BEVS offers a number of advantages including high levels of expression as well...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Inc.
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7132753/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22297133 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2012.01.009 |
_version_ | 1783517499892957184 |
---|---|
author | Sokolenko, Stanislav George, Steve Wagner, Andreas Tuladhar, Anup Andrich, Jonas M.S. Aucoin, Marc G. |
author_facet | Sokolenko, Stanislav George, Steve Wagner, Andreas Tuladhar, Anup Andrich, Jonas M.S. Aucoin, Marc G. |
author_sort | Sokolenko, Stanislav |
collection | PubMed |
description | The baculovirus expression vector system (BEVS) is a versatile and powerful platform for protein expression in insect cells. With the ability to approach similar post-translational modifications as in mammalian cells, the BEVS offers a number of advantages including high levels of expression as well as an inherent safety during manufacture and of the final product. Many BEVS products include proteins and protein complexes that require expression from more than one gene. This review examines the expression strategies that have been used to this end and focuses on the distinguishing features between those that make use of single polycistronic baculovirus (co-expression) and those that use multiple monocistronic baculoviruses (co-infection). Three major areas in which researchers have been able to take advantage of co-expression/co-infection are addressed, including compound structure-function studies, insect cell functionality augmentation, and VLP production. The core of the review discusses the parameters of interest for co-infection and co-expression with time of infection (TOI) and multiplicity of infection (MOI) highlighted for the former and the choice of promoter for the latter. In addition, an overview of modeling approaches is presented, with a suggested trajectory for future exploration. The review concludes with an examination of the gaps that still remain in co-expression/co-infection knowledge and practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7132753 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Elsevier Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71327532020-04-08 Co-expression vs. co-infection using baculovirus expression vectors in insect cell culture: Benefits and drawbacks Sokolenko, Stanislav George, Steve Wagner, Andreas Tuladhar, Anup Andrich, Jonas M.S. Aucoin, Marc G. Biotechnol Adv Article The baculovirus expression vector system (BEVS) is a versatile and powerful platform for protein expression in insect cells. With the ability to approach similar post-translational modifications as in mammalian cells, the BEVS offers a number of advantages including high levels of expression as well as an inherent safety during manufacture and of the final product. Many BEVS products include proteins and protein complexes that require expression from more than one gene. This review examines the expression strategies that have been used to this end and focuses on the distinguishing features between those that make use of single polycistronic baculovirus (co-expression) and those that use multiple monocistronic baculoviruses (co-infection). Three major areas in which researchers have been able to take advantage of co-expression/co-infection are addressed, including compound structure-function studies, insect cell functionality augmentation, and VLP production. The core of the review discusses the parameters of interest for co-infection and co-expression with time of infection (TOI) and multiplicity of infection (MOI) highlighted for the former and the choice of promoter for the latter. In addition, an overview of modeling approaches is presented, with a suggested trajectory for future exploration. The review concludes with an examination of the gaps that still remain in co-expression/co-infection knowledge and practice. Elsevier Inc. 2012 2012-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7132753/ /pubmed/22297133 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2012.01.009 Text en Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Sokolenko, Stanislav George, Steve Wagner, Andreas Tuladhar, Anup Andrich, Jonas M.S. Aucoin, Marc G. Co-expression vs. co-infection using baculovirus expression vectors in insect cell culture: Benefits and drawbacks |
title | Co-expression vs. co-infection using baculovirus expression vectors in insect cell culture: Benefits and drawbacks |
title_full | Co-expression vs. co-infection using baculovirus expression vectors in insect cell culture: Benefits and drawbacks |
title_fullStr | Co-expression vs. co-infection using baculovirus expression vectors in insect cell culture: Benefits and drawbacks |
title_full_unstemmed | Co-expression vs. co-infection using baculovirus expression vectors in insect cell culture: Benefits and drawbacks |
title_short | Co-expression vs. co-infection using baculovirus expression vectors in insect cell culture: Benefits and drawbacks |
title_sort | co-expression vs. co-infection using baculovirus expression vectors in insect cell culture: benefits and drawbacks |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7132753/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22297133 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2012.01.009 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sokolenkostanislav coexpressionvscoinfectionusingbaculovirusexpressionvectorsininsectcellculturebenefitsanddrawbacks AT georgesteve coexpressionvscoinfectionusingbaculovirusexpressionvectorsininsectcellculturebenefitsanddrawbacks AT wagnerandreas coexpressionvscoinfectionusingbaculovirusexpressionvectorsininsectcellculturebenefitsanddrawbacks AT tuladharanup coexpressionvscoinfectionusingbaculovirusexpressionvectorsininsectcellculturebenefitsanddrawbacks AT andrichjonasms coexpressionvscoinfectionusingbaculovirusexpressionvectorsininsectcellculturebenefitsanddrawbacks AT aucoinmarcg coexpressionvscoinfectionusingbaculovirusexpressionvectorsininsectcellculturebenefitsanddrawbacks |