Cargando…

2D perfusion-angiography during endovascular intervention for critical limb threatening ischemia – A feasibility study

PURPOSE: Two-dimensional perfusion angiography is a new method to quantify and evaluate tissue perfusion during endovascular intervention. The aim was to evaluate time-patterns and dynamics of contrast arrival and distribution before and after endovascular intervention in patients with critical limb...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pärsson, Håkan N, Lundin, Niklas, Lindgren, Hans
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7133075/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32284859
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2048004020915392
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: Two-dimensional perfusion angiography is a new method to quantify and evaluate tissue perfusion during endovascular intervention. The aim was to evaluate time-patterns and dynamics of contrast arrival and distribution before and after endovascular intervention in patients with critical limb threatening ischemia. METHODS: Data were collected from 37 patients with critical limb threatening ischemia due to infra-inguinal occlusive disease having a successful endovascular procedure. two-dimensional perfusion angiography was used as a post-processing software with analysis of numeric parameters related to arrival and distribution patterns of contrast. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients were successfully analysed whereas four patients were excluded due to motion artefacts. All patients were successfully treated with recanalization of the superficial femoral, popliteal, below the knee-vessels or a combination. Short-term improvement at 30-day follow-up was noted both clinically and by ankle-brachial index and toe pressure measurements. A significant reduction in contrast arrival time between pre-and post-angioplasty runs was noted as measured by arrival time median 3.2 and interquartile range (2.5–4.2) vs. 2.6 (1.6–3.4) and time-to-peak 4.1 (3.6–5.0) vs. 3.1 (2.3–3.9) p = 0.009. An increased wash-in rate was also observed 18.3 (12.6–21) vs. 30.1 (22–30.5) p = 0.001 between pre-and post-angioplasty runs. CONCLUSIONS: The use of perfusion angiography for evaluation of foot-circulation during endovascular interventions provides new information regarding quantitative assessment of contrast inflow before and after endovascular intervention without the need for extra contrast or runs. No selective catheterisation is necessary. The technique is easily adopted in a clinical setting. Further studies are necessary to create robust clinical endpoints.