Cargando…

Proportional morbidity rates of enteropathogens among diarrheic dairy calves in central Spain

Faecal samples from 218 diarrheic dairy calves in 65 dairy herds, selected by convenience, were screened for the presence of rotavirus, coronavirus, Cryptosporidium spp., F5(+)Escherichia coli and Salmonella spp. Animals surveyed were from 1 to 30 days old. Cryptosporidium and rotavirus were the mos...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de la Fuente, R, García, A, Ruiz-Santa-Quiteria, J.A, Luzón, M, Cid, D, García, S, Orden, J.A, Gómez-Bautista, M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Science B.V. 1998
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7133840/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9762735
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-5877(98)00077-4
Descripción
Sumario:Faecal samples from 218 diarrheic dairy calves in 65 dairy herds, selected by convenience, were screened for the presence of rotavirus, coronavirus, Cryptosporidium spp., F5(+)Escherichia coli and Salmonella spp. Animals surveyed were from 1 to 30 days old. Cryptosporidium and rotavirus were the most commonly detected agents (52.3% and 42.7% of the samples positive, respectively). F5(+)E. coli was detected in the faeces of 11.9% of the calves and bovine coronavirus was detected in the faeces of 7.3% of the calves. Salmonella spp. was only found in the faeces of two calves (0.9%). Mixed infections with two or more agents occurred in 28% of the calves. Concurrent infection of rotavirus and Cryptosporidium was found in 21.6% of the calves. Two tests were used for the detection of rotavirus (a commercial ELISA and PAGE), F5(+)E. coli (ELISA and bacterial culture) and Cryptosporidium (ELISA and microscopy). The validity of the commercial ELISA for the detection of rotavirus, F5(+)E. coli and Cryptosporidium in faeces from diarrheic calves was evaluated using PAGE, bacterial culture and microscopy as gold standard, respectively. The ELISA showed a very low sensitivity (28.6%) for the detection of F5(+)E. coli compared to bacterial culture.