Cargando…

An effective dosage regimen for prophylaxis against rhinovirus infection by intranasal administration of HuIFN-α(2)()

Before the prophylactic effect of human interferon α(2) (HuIFN-α(2)) can be tested against naturally acquired rhinovirus infection in a large-scale field trial, it is desirable to show that self-administration of the drug is practical, and to determine the smallest well-tolerated dose likely to prod...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Phillpotts, R.J., Scott, G.M., Higgins, P.G., Wallace, J., Tyrrell, D.A.J., Gauci, C.L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Published by Elsevier B.V. 1983
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7133861/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6312877
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0166-3542(83)90034-7
Descripción
Sumario:Before the prophylactic effect of human interferon α(2) (HuIFN-α(2)) can be tested against naturally acquired rhinovirus infection in a large-scale field trial, it is desirable to show that self-administration of the drug is practical, and to determine the smallest well-tolerated dose likely to produce a worthwhile effect. Here we report that self-administered intranasal interferon can be effective, and show how prophylaxis against rhinovirus infection is affected by both the quantity of interferon, and the interval between a dose and virus challenge. Finally, the medication regimen suggested for use in field trials (3.85 MU 3 times/day) was tested in a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in volunteers. Although virus challenge was at a time when those being treated with interferon would be most susceptible, a substantial protective effect was still demonstrated.