Cargando…

Polyetheretherketone Versus Titanium Cages for Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Meta-Analysis and Review of the Literature

OBJECTIVE: Lumbar fusion with implantation of interbody cage is a common procedure for treatment of lumbar degenerative disease. This study aims to compare the fusion and subsidence rates of titanium (Ti) versus polyetheretherketone (PEEK) interbody cages after posterior lumbar interbody fusion and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Massaad, Elie, Fatima, Nida, Kiapour, Ali, Hadzipasic, Muhamed, Shankar, Ganesh M., Shin, John H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7136087/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32252163
http://dx.doi.org/10.14245/ns.2040058.029
_version_ 1783518178248228864
author Massaad, Elie
Fatima, Nida
Kiapour, Ali
Hadzipasic, Muhamed
Shankar, Ganesh M.
Shin, John H.
author_facet Massaad, Elie
Fatima, Nida
Kiapour, Ali
Hadzipasic, Muhamed
Shankar, Ganesh M.
Shin, John H.
author_sort Massaad, Elie
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Lumbar fusion with implantation of interbody cage is a common procedure for treatment of lumbar degenerative disease. This study aims to compare the fusion and subsidence rates of titanium (Ti) versus polyetheretherketone (PEEK) interbody cages after posterior lumbar interbody fusion and investigate the effect of clinical and radiological outcomes following fusion on patient-reported outcomes. METHODS: A systematic search strategy of 4 electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane) was conducted using different MeSH (medical subject headings) terms until January 2020. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using fixed and random-effect models based upon the heterogeneity (I(2)) to estimate the association between interbody cages and the measured outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 1,094 patients from 11 studies were reviewed. The final analysis included 421 patients (38.5%) who had lumbar surgery using a Ti and/or a Ti-coated interbody cage and 673 patient (61.5%) who had lumbar surgery using a PEEK cage. Overall, PEEK interbody devices were associated with a significantly lower fusion rate compared with Ti interbody devices (OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.41–0.93; p = 0.02). There was no difference in subsidence rates between Ti and PEEK groups (OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.54–1.52; p = 0.71). Also, there were no statistically significant differences in visual analogue scale (VAS)-low back pain (p = 0.14) and Japanese Orthopedic Association scale (p = 0.86) between the 2 groups. However, the PEEK group had lower odds of leg pain after surgery compared to the Ti group (OR [VAS-leg], 0.61; 95% CI, 0.28–0.94; p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Ti and Ti-coated PEEK cages used for posterior lumbar interbody fusion are associated with similar rates of subsidence, but a higher rate of fusion compared to PEEK interbody cages. Randomized controlled trials are needed to better assess the effect of cage materials and potential factors that could influence the outcomes of interbody lumbar fusion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7136087
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71360872020-04-09 Polyetheretherketone Versus Titanium Cages for Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Meta-Analysis and Review of the Literature Massaad, Elie Fatima, Nida Kiapour, Ali Hadzipasic, Muhamed Shankar, Ganesh M. Shin, John H. Neurospine Original Article OBJECTIVE: Lumbar fusion with implantation of interbody cage is a common procedure for treatment of lumbar degenerative disease. This study aims to compare the fusion and subsidence rates of titanium (Ti) versus polyetheretherketone (PEEK) interbody cages after posterior lumbar interbody fusion and investigate the effect of clinical and radiological outcomes following fusion on patient-reported outcomes. METHODS: A systematic search strategy of 4 electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane) was conducted using different MeSH (medical subject headings) terms until January 2020. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using fixed and random-effect models based upon the heterogeneity (I(2)) to estimate the association between interbody cages and the measured outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 1,094 patients from 11 studies were reviewed. The final analysis included 421 patients (38.5%) who had lumbar surgery using a Ti and/or a Ti-coated interbody cage and 673 patient (61.5%) who had lumbar surgery using a PEEK cage. Overall, PEEK interbody devices were associated with a significantly lower fusion rate compared with Ti interbody devices (OR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.41–0.93; p = 0.02). There was no difference in subsidence rates between Ti and PEEK groups (OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.54–1.52; p = 0.71). Also, there were no statistically significant differences in visual analogue scale (VAS)-low back pain (p = 0.14) and Japanese Orthopedic Association scale (p = 0.86) between the 2 groups. However, the PEEK group had lower odds of leg pain after surgery compared to the Ti group (OR [VAS-leg], 0.61; 95% CI, 0.28–0.94; p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Ti and Ti-coated PEEK cages used for posterior lumbar interbody fusion are associated with similar rates of subsidence, but a higher rate of fusion compared to PEEK interbody cages. Randomized controlled trials are needed to better assess the effect of cage materials and potential factors that could influence the outcomes of interbody lumbar fusion. Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society 2020-03 2020-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7136087/ /pubmed/32252163 http://dx.doi.org/10.14245/ns.2040058.029 Text en Copyright © 2020 by the Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Massaad, Elie
Fatima, Nida
Kiapour, Ali
Hadzipasic, Muhamed
Shankar, Ganesh M.
Shin, John H.
Polyetheretherketone Versus Titanium Cages for Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Meta-Analysis and Review of the Literature
title Polyetheretherketone Versus Titanium Cages for Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Meta-Analysis and Review of the Literature
title_full Polyetheretherketone Versus Titanium Cages for Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Meta-Analysis and Review of the Literature
title_fullStr Polyetheretherketone Versus Titanium Cages for Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Meta-Analysis and Review of the Literature
title_full_unstemmed Polyetheretherketone Versus Titanium Cages for Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Meta-Analysis and Review of the Literature
title_short Polyetheretherketone Versus Titanium Cages for Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Meta-Analysis and Review of the Literature
title_sort polyetheretherketone versus titanium cages for posterior lumbar interbody fusion: meta-analysis and review of the literature
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7136087/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32252163
http://dx.doi.org/10.14245/ns.2040058.029
work_keys_str_mv AT massaadelie polyetheretherketoneversustitaniumcagesforposteriorlumbarinterbodyfusionmetaanalysisandreviewoftheliterature
AT fatimanida polyetheretherketoneversustitaniumcagesforposteriorlumbarinterbodyfusionmetaanalysisandreviewoftheliterature
AT kiapourali polyetheretherketoneversustitaniumcagesforposteriorlumbarinterbodyfusionmetaanalysisandreviewoftheliterature
AT hadzipasicmuhamed polyetheretherketoneversustitaniumcagesforposteriorlumbarinterbodyfusionmetaanalysisandreviewoftheliterature
AT shankarganeshm polyetheretherketoneversustitaniumcagesforposteriorlumbarinterbodyfusionmetaanalysisandreviewoftheliterature
AT shinjohnh polyetheretherketoneversustitaniumcagesforposteriorlumbarinterbodyfusionmetaanalysisandreviewoftheliterature