Cargando…
Risks and benefits of pasture irrigation using treated municipal effluent : a lysimeter case study, Canterbury, New Zealand
Compared to discharge into waterways, land application of treated municipal effluent (TME) can reduce the need for both inorganic fertilizers and irrigation. However, TME irrigation may result in the accumulation of phosphorus (P) or trace elements in soil, and increased salinity and sodicity, which...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7136187/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31970644 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-07759-8 |
_version_ | 1783518195227820032 |
---|---|
author | Gutierrez-Gines, Maria Jesus Mishra, Minakshi McIntyre, Cameron Chau, Henry Wai Esperschuetz, Juergen McLenaghen, Roger Bourke, Mike P. Robinson, Brett H. |
author_facet | Gutierrez-Gines, Maria Jesus Mishra, Minakshi McIntyre, Cameron Chau, Henry Wai Esperschuetz, Juergen McLenaghen, Roger Bourke, Mike P. Robinson, Brett H. |
author_sort | Gutierrez-Gines, Maria Jesus |
collection | PubMed |
description | Compared to discharge into waterways, land application of treated municipal effluent (TME) can reduce the need for both inorganic fertilizers and irrigation. However, TME irrigation may result in the accumulation of phosphorus (P) or trace elements in soil, and increased salinity and sodicity, which could damage soil structure and reduce infiltration. TME irrigation can also result in groundwater contamination through nitrate leaching or surface water contamination through runoff. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of increasing TME irrigation rates on quantity and quality of leachate and pasture growth in a lysimeter experiment using a Fluvial Recent soil and a Fragic Pallic soil. Pasture growth in the lysimeters was up to 2.5-fold higher in the TME treatments compared to the non-irrigated treatments. There were no signs of toxicity or accumulation of B, Al, Cd, Cu, Fe, Mn, As, and Zn. TME significantly increased the concentration of P and Na in the pasture. Nitrogen leaching from the lysimeters was negligible (< 1 kg/ha(−1) equiv.) in all treatments, but mineral N accumulated in the soil profile of the highest application rate (1672 mm/yr). Although more P was added than removed in pasture, the rate of accumulation indicated that over a 50-year period, P will still be within the current New Zealand thresholds for grazed pastures. Sodium accumulated in the soil columns in all the TME treatments. The rate of accumulation was not proportional to the TME application rate, indicating that Na was moving down through the soil profile and leaching. Results indicate a low to moderate risk of sodicity in soil or toxicity in plants caused by Na. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11356-020-07759-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7136187 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71361872020-04-09 Risks and benefits of pasture irrigation using treated municipal effluent : a lysimeter case study, Canterbury, New Zealand Gutierrez-Gines, Maria Jesus Mishra, Minakshi McIntyre, Cameron Chau, Henry Wai Esperschuetz, Juergen McLenaghen, Roger Bourke, Mike P. Robinson, Brett H. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int Research Article Compared to discharge into waterways, land application of treated municipal effluent (TME) can reduce the need for both inorganic fertilizers and irrigation. However, TME irrigation may result in the accumulation of phosphorus (P) or trace elements in soil, and increased salinity and sodicity, which could damage soil structure and reduce infiltration. TME irrigation can also result in groundwater contamination through nitrate leaching or surface water contamination through runoff. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of increasing TME irrigation rates on quantity and quality of leachate and pasture growth in a lysimeter experiment using a Fluvial Recent soil and a Fragic Pallic soil. Pasture growth in the lysimeters was up to 2.5-fold higher in the TME treatments compared to the non-irrigated treatments. There were no signs of toxicity or accumulation of B, Al, Cd, Cu, Fe, Mn, As, and Zn. TME significantly increased the concentration of P and Na in the pasture. Nitrogen leaching from the lysimeters was negligible (< 1 kg/ha(−1) equiv.) in all treatments, but mineral N accumulated in the soil profile of the highest application rate (1672 mm/yr). Although more P was added than removed in pasture, the rate of accumulation indicated that over a 50-year period, P will still be within the current New Zealand thresholds for grazed pastures. Sodium accumulated in the soil columns in all the TME treatments. The rate of accumulation was not proportional to the TME application rate, indicating that Na was moving down through the soil profile and leaching. Results indicate a low to moderate risk of sodicity in soil or toxicity in plants caused by Na. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11356-020-07759-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-01-23 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7136187/ /pubmed/31970644 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-07759-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Gutierrez-Gines, Maria Jesus Mishra, Minakshi McIntyre, Cameron Chau, Henry Wai Esperschuetz, Juergen McLenaghen, Roger Bourke, Mike P. Robinson, Brett H. Risks and benefits of pasture irrigation using treated municipal effluent : a lysimeter case study, Canterbury, New Zealand |
title | Risks and benefits of pasture irrigation using treated municipal effluent : a lysimeter case study, Canterbury, New Zealand |
title_full | Risks and benefits of pasture irrigation using treated municipal effluent : a lysimeter case study, Canterbury, New Zealand |
title_fullStr | Risks and benefits of pasture irrigation using treated municipal effluent : a lysimeter case study, Canterbury, New Zealand |
title_full_unstemmed | Risks and benefits of pasture irrigation using treated municipal effluent : a lysimeter case study, Canterbury, New Zealand |
title_short | Risks and benefits of pasture irrigation using treated municipal effluent : a lysimeter case study, Canterbury, New Zealand |
title_sort | risks and benefits of pasture irrigation using treated municipal effluent : a lysimeter case study, canterbury, new zealand |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7136187/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31970644 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-07759-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gutierrezginesmariajesus risksandbenefitsofpastureirrigationusingtreatedmunicipaleffluentalysimetercasestudycanterburynewzealand AT mishraminakshi risksandbenefitsofpastureirrigationusingtreatedmunicipaleffluentalysimetercasestudycanterburynewzealand AT mcintyrecameron risksandbenefitsofpastureirrigationusingtreatedmunicipaleffluentalysimetercasestudycanterburynewzealand AT chauhenrywai risksandbenefitsofpastureirrigationusingtreatedmunicipaleffluentalysimetercasestudycanterburynewzealand AT esperschuetzjuergen risksandbenefitsofpastureirrigationusingtreatedmunicipaleffluentalysimetercasestudycanterburynewzealand AT mclenaghenroger risksandbenefitsofpastureirrigationusingtreatedmunicipaleffluentalysimetercasestudycanterburynewzealand AT bourkemikep risksandbenefitsofpastureirrigationusingtreatedmunicipaleffluentalysimetercasestudycanterburynewzealand AT robinsonbretth risksandbenefitsofpastureirrigationusingtreatedmunicipaleffluentalysimetercasestudycanterburynewzealand |