Cargando…

Comparative effectiveness of branded vs. generic versions of antihypertensive, lipid-lowering and hypoglycemic substances: a population-wide cohort study

Generic medications offer substantial potential cost savings to health systems compared to their branded counterparts. In Europe and the US, they are only approved if they are bioequivalent to the respective originator product. Nevertheless, the lack of clinical outcomes is sometimes used as the rea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tian, Yuxi, Reichardt, Berthold, Dunkler, Daniela, Hronsky, Milan, Winkelmayer, Wolfgang C., Bucsics, Anna, Strohmaier, Susanne, Heinze, Georg
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7136234/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32249786
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-62318-y
_version_ 1783518205566779392
author Tian, Yuxi
Reichardt, Berthold
Dunkler, Daniela
Hronsky, Milan
Winkelmayer, Wolfgang C.
Bucsics, Anna
Strohmaier, Susanne
Heinze, Georg
author_facet Tian, Yuxi
Reichardt, Berthold
Dunkler, Daniela
Hronsky, Milan
Winkelmayer, Wolfgang C.
Bucsics, Anna
Strohmaier, Susanne
Heinze, Georg
author_sort Tian, Yuxi
collection PubMed
description Generic medications offer substantial potential cost savings to health systems compared to their branded counterparts. In Europe and the US, they are only approved if they are bioequivalent to the respective originator product. Nevertheless, the lack of clinical outcomes is sometimes used as the reason for hesitancy in prescribing generics. We performed an observational retrospective study on 17 branded vs. generic pharmaceutical substances for the treatment of hypertension/heart failure, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes mellitus in a dataset of 9,413,620 insured persons, representing nearly the full population of Austria, from 2007 to 2012. We compared generic vs. branded medications using hazard ratios for all-cause death and major adverse cardiac and cardiovascular events (MACCE) as outcomes of interest. Using patient demographics, health characteristics from hospitalization records, and pharmacy records as covariates, we controlled for confounding in Cox models through inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using high-dimensional propensity scores. We observed that the unadjusted hazard ratios strongly favor generic drugs for all three pooled treatment indications (hypertension/heart failure, hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus), but were attenuated towards unity with increasingly larger covariate sets used for confounding control. We found that after IPTW adjustment the generic formulation was associated with significantly fewer deaths in 10 of 17 investigated drugs, and with fewer MACCE in 11 of 17 investigated drugs. This result favoring generic drugs was also present in a number of sub-analyses based on gender, prior disease status, and treatment discontinuation. E-value sensitivity analyses suggested that only strong unmeasured confounding could fully explain away the observed results. In conclusion, generic medications were at least similar, and in some cases superior, to their branded counterparts regarding mortality and major cardiovascular events.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7136234
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71362342020-04-11 Comparative effectiveness of branded vs. generic versions of antihypertensive, lipid-lowering and hypoglycemic substances: a population-wide cohort study Tian, Yuxi Reichardt, Berthold Dunkler, Daniela Hronsky, Milan Winkelmayer, Wolfgang C. Bucsics, Anna Strohmaier, Susanne Heinze, Georg Sci Rep Article Generic medications offer substantial potential cost savings to health systems compared to their branded counterparts. In Europe and the US, they are only approved if they are bioequivalent to the respective originator product. Nevertheless, the lack of clinical outcomes is sometimes used as the reason for hesitancy in prescribing generics. We performed an observational retrospective study on 17 branded vs. generic pharmaceutical substances for the treatment of hypertension/heart failure, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes mellitus in a dataset of 9,413,620 insured persons, representing nearly the full population of Austria, from 2007 to 2012. We compared generic vs. branded medications using hazard ratios for all-cause death and major adverse cardiac and cardiovascular events (MACCE) as outcomes of interest. Using patient demographics, health characteristics from hospitalization records, and pharmacy records as covariates, we controlled for confounding in Cox models through inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using high-dimensional propensity scores. We observed that the unadjusted hazard ratios strongly favor generic drugs for all three pooled treatment indications (hypertension/heart failure, hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus), but were attenuated towards unity with increasingly larger covariate sets used for confounding control. We found that after IPTW adjustment the generic formulation was associated with significantly fewer deaths in 10 of 17 investigated drugs, and with fewer MACCE in 11 of 17 investigated drugs. This result favoring generic drugs was also present in a number of sub-analyses based on gender, prior disease status, and treatment discontinuation. E-value sensitivity analyses suggested that only strong unmeasured confounding could fully explain away the observed results. In conclusion, generic medications were at least similar, and in some cases superior, to their branded counterparts regarding mortality and major cardiovascular events. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7136234/ /pubmed/32249786 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-62318-y Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Tian, Yuxi
Reichardt, Berthold
Dunkler, Daniela
Hronsky, Milan
Winkelmayer, Wolfgang C.
Bucsics, Anna
Strohmaier, Susanne
Heinze, Georg
Comparative effectiveness of branded vs. generic versions of antihypertensive, lipid-lowering and hypoglycemic substances: a population-wide cohort study
title Comparative effectiveness of branded vs. generic versions of antihypertensive, lipid-lowering and hypoglycemic substances: a population-wide cohort study
title_full Comparative effectiveness of branded vs. generic versions of antihypertensive, lipid-lowering and hypoglycemic substances: a population-wide cohort study
title_fullStr Comparative effectiveness of branded vs. generic versions of antihypertensive, lipid-lowering and hypoglycemic substances: a population-wide cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative effectiveness of branded vs. generic versions of antihypertensive, lipid-lowering and hypoglycemic substances: a population-wide cohort study
title_short Comparative effectiveness of branded vs. generic versions of antihypertensive, lipid-lowering and hypoglycemic substances: a population-wide cohort study
title_sort comparative effectiveness of branded vs. generic versions of antihypertensive, lipid-lowering and hypoglycemic substances: a population-wide cohort study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7136234/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32249786
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-62318-y
work_keys_str_mv AT tianyuxi comparativeeffectivenessofbrandedvsgenericversionsofantihypertensivelipidloweringandhypoglycemicsubstancesapopulationwidecohortstudy
AT reichardtberthold comparativeeffectivenessofbrandedvsgenericversionsofantihypertensivelipidloweringandhypoglycemicsubstancesapopulationwidecohortstudy
AT dunklerdaniela comparativeeffectivenessofbrandedvsgenericversionsofantihypertensivelipidloweringandhypoglycemicsubstancesapopulationwidecohortstudy
AT hronskymilan comparativeeffectivenessofbrandedvsgenericversionsofantihypertensivelipidloweringandhypoglycemicsubstancesapopulationwidecohortstudy
AT winkelmayerwolfgangc comparativeeffectivenessofbrandedvsgenericversionsofantihypertensivelipidloweringandhypoglycemicsubstancesapopulationwidecohortstudy
AT bucsicsanna comparativeeffectivenessofbrandedvsgenericversionsofantihypertensivelipidloweringandhypoglycemicsubstancesapopulationwidecohortstudy
AT strohmaiersusanne comparativeeffectivenessofbrandedvsgenericversionsofantihypertensivelipidloweringandhypoglycemicsubstancesapopulationwidecohortstudy
AT heinzegeorg comparativeeffectivenessofbrandedvsgenericversionsofantihypertensivelipidloweringandhypoglycemicsubstancesapopulationwidecohortstudy