Cargando…

Verotoxin Receptor-Based Pathology and Therapies

Verotoxin, VT (aka Shiga toxin,Stx) is produced by enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC) and is the key pathogenic factor in EHEC-induced hemolytic uremic syndrome (eHUS-hemolytic anemia/thrombocytopenia/glomerular infarct) which can follow gastrointestinal EHEC infection, particularly in children. This...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Lingwood, Clifford
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7136409/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32296648
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2020.00123
_version_ 1783518242504966144
author Lingwood, Clifford
author_facet Lingwood, Clifford
author_sort Lingwood, Clifford
collection PubMed
description Verotoxin, VT (aka Shiga toxin,Stx) is produced by enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC) and is the key pathogenic factor in EHEC-induced hemolytic uremic syndrome (eHUS-hemolytic anemia/thrombocytopenia/glomerular infarct) which can follow gastrointestinal EHEC infection, particularly in children. This AB5 subunit toxin family bind target cell globotriaosyl ceramide (Gb(3)), a glycosphingolipid (GSL) (aka CD77, pk blood group antigen) of the globoseries of neutral GSLs, initiating lipid raft-dependent plasma membrane Gb(3) clustering, membrane curvature, invagination, scission, endosomal trafficking, and retrograde traffic via the TGN to the Golgi, and ER. In the ER, A/B subunits separate and the A subunit hijacks the ER reverse translocon (dislocon-used to eliminate misfolded proteins-ER associated degradation-ERAD) for cytosolic access. This property has been used to devise toxoid-based therapy to temporarily block ERAD and rescue the mutant phenotype of several genetic protein misfolding diseases. The A subunit avoids cytosolic proteosomal degradation, to block protein synthesis via its RNA glycanase activity. In humans, Gb(3) is primarily expressed in the kidney, particularly in the glomerular endothelial cells. Here, Gb(3) is in lipid rafts (more ordered membrane domains which accumulate GSLs/cholesterol) whereas renal tubular Gb(3) is in the non-raft membrane fraction, explaining the basic pathology of eHUS (glomerular endothelial infarct). Females are more susceptible and this correlates with higher renal Gb(3) expression. HUS can be associated with encephalopathy, more commonly following verotoxin 2 exposure. Gb(3) is expressed in the microvasculature of the brain. All members of the VT family bind Gb(3), but with varying affinity. VT2e (pig edema toxin) binds Gb(4) preferentially. Verotoxin-specific therapeutics based on chemical analogs of Gb(3), though effective in vitro, have failed in vivo. While some analogs are effective in animal models, there are no good rodent models of eHUS since Gb(3) is not expressed in rodent glomeruli. However, the mouse mimics the neurological symptoms more closely and provides an excellent tool to assess therapeutics. In addition to direct cytotoxicity, other factors including VT–induced cytokine release and aberrant complement cascade, are now appreciated as important in eHUS. Based on atypical HUS therapy, treatment of eHUS patients with anticomplement antibodies has proven effective in some cases. A recent switch using stem cells to try to reverse, rather than prevent VT induced pathology may prove a more effective methodology.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7136409
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71364092020-04-15 Verotoxin Receptor-Based Pathology and Therapies Lingwood, Clifford Front Cell Infect Microbiol Cellular and Infection Microbiology Verotoxin, VT (aka Shiga toxin,Stx) is produced by enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC) and is the key pathogenic factor in EHEC-induced hemolytic uremic syndrome (eHUS-hemolytic anemia/thrombocytopenia/glomerular infarct) which can follow gastrointestinal EHEC infection, particularly in children. This AB5 subunit toxin family bind target cell globotriaosyl ceramide (Gb(3)), a glycosphingolipid (GSL) (aka CD77, pk blood group antigen) of the globoseries of neutral GSLs, initiating lipid raft-dependent plasma membrane Gb(3) clustering, membrane curvature, invagination, scission, endosomal trafficking, and retrograde traffic via the TGN to the Golgi, and ER. In the ER, A/B subunits separate and the A subunit hijacks the ER reverse translocon (dislocon-used to eliminate misfolded proteins-ER associated degradation-ERAD) for cytosolic access. This property has been used to devise toxoid-based therapy to temporarily block ERAD and rescue the mutant phenotype of several genetic protein misfolding diseases. The A subunit avoids cytosolic proteosomal degradation, to block protein synthesis via its RNA glycanase activity. In humans, Gb(3) is primarily expressed in the kidney, particularly in the glomerular endothelial cells. Here, Gb(3) is in lipid rafts (more ordered membrane domains which accumulate GSLs/cholesterol) whereas renal tubular Gb(3) is in the non-raft membrane fraction, explaining the basic pathology of eHUS (glomerular endothelial infarct). Females are more susceptible and this correlates with higher renal Gb(3) expression. HUS can be associated with encephalopathy, more commonly following verotoxin 2 exposure. Gb(3) is expressed in the microvasculature of the brain. All members of the VT family bind Gb(3), but with varying affinity. VT2e (pig edema toxin) binds Gb(4) preferentially. Verotoxin-specific therapeutics based on chemical analogs of Gb(3), though effective in vitro, have failed in vivo. While some analogs are effective in animal models, there are no good rodent models of eHUS since Gb(3) is not expressed in rodent glomeruli. However, the mouse mimics the neurological symptoms more closely and provides an excellent tool to assess therapeutics. In addition to direct cytotoxicity, other factors including VT–induced cytokine release and aberrant complement cascade, are now appreciated as important in eHUS. Based on atypical HUS therapy, treatment of eHUS patients with anticomplement antibodies has proven effective in some cases. A recent switch using stem cells to try to reverse, rather than prevent VT induced pathology may prove a more effective methodology. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7136409/ /pubmed/32296648 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2020.00123 Text en Copyright © 2020 Lingwood. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Cellular and Infection Microbiology
Lingwood, Clifford
Verotoxin Receptor-Based Pathology and Therapies
title Verotoxin Receptor-Based Pathology and Therapies
title_full Verotoxin Receptor-Based Pathology and Therapies
title_fullStr Verotoxin Receptor-Based Pathology and Therapies
title_full_unstemmed Verotoxin Receptor-Based Pathology and Therapies
title_short Verotoxin Receptor-Based Pathology and Therapies
title_sort verotoxin receptor-based pathology and therapies
topic Cellular and Infection Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7136409/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32296648
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2020.00123
work_keys_str_mv AT lingwoodclifford verotoxinreceptorbasedpathologyandtherapies