Cargando…
Call for Participation: Collaborative Benchmarking of Functional-Structural Root Architecture Models. The Case of Root Water Uptake
Three-dimensional models of root growth, architecture and function are becoming important tools that aid the design of agricultural management schemes and the selection of beneficial root traits. However, while benchmarking is common in many disciplines that use numerical models, such as natural and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7136536/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32296451 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00316 |
_version_ | 1783518271266357248 |
---|---|
author | Schnepf, Andrea Black, Christopher K. Couvreur, Valentin Delory, Benjamin M. Doussan, Claude Koch, Axelle Koch, Timo Javaux, Mathieu Landl, Magdalena Leitner, Daniel Lobet, Guillaume Mai, Trung Hieu Meunier, Félicien Petrich, Lukas Postma, Johannes A. Priesack, Eckart Schmidt, Volker Vanderborght, Jan Vereecken, Harry Weber, Matthias |
author_facet | Schnepf, Andrea Black, Christopher K. Couvreur, Valentin Delory, Benjamin M. Doussan, Claude Koch, Axelle Koch, Timo Javaux, Mathieu Landl, Magdalena Leitner, Daniel Lobet, Guillaume Mai, Trung Hieu Meunier, Félicien Petrich, Lukas Postma, Johannes A. Priesack, Eckart Schmidt, Volker Vanderborght, Jan Vereecken, Harry Weber, Matthias |
author_sort | Schnepf, Andrea |
collection | PubMed |
description | Three-dimensional models of root growth, architecture and function are becoming important tools that aid the design of agricultural management schemes and the selection of beneficial root traits. However, while benchmarking is common in many disciplines that use numerical models, such as natural and engineering sciences, functional-structural root architecture models have never been systematically compared. The following reasons might induce disagreement between the simulation results of different models: different representation of root growth, sink term of root water and solute uptake and representation of the rhizosphere. Presently, the extent of discrepancies is unknown, and a framework for quantitatively comparing functional-structural root architecture models is required. We propose, in a first step, to define benchmarking scenarios that test individual components of complex models: root architecture, water flow in soil and water flow in roots. While the latter two will focus mainly on comparing numerical aspects, the root architectural models have to be compared at a conceptual level as they generally differ in process representation. Therefore, defining common inputs that allow recreating reference root systems in all models will be a key challenge. In a second step, benchmarking scenarios for the coupled problems are defined. We expect that the results of step 1 will enable us to better interpret differences found in step 2. This benchmarking will result in a better understanding of the different models and contribute toward improving them. Improved models will allow us to simulate various scenarios with greater confidence and avoid bugs, numerical errors or conceptual misunderstandings. This work will set a standard for future model development. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7136536 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71365362020-04-15 Call for Participation: Collaborative Benchmarking of Functional-Structural Root Architecture Models. The Case of Root Water Uptake Schnepf, Andrea Black, Christopher K. Couvreur, Valentin Delory, Benjamin M. Doussan, Claude Koch, Axelle Koch, Timo Javaux, Mathieu Landl, Magdalena Leitner, Daniel Lobet, Guillaume Mai, Trung Hieu Meunier, Félicien Petrich, Lukas Postma, Johannes A. Priesack, Eckart Schmidt, Volker Vanderborght, Jan Vereecken, Harry Weber, Matthias Front Plant Sci Plant Science Three-dimensional models of root growth, architecture and function are becoming important tools that aid the design of agricultural management schemes and the selection of beneficial root traits. However, while benchmarking is common in many disciplines that use numerical models, such as natural and engineering sciences, functional-structural root architecture models have never been systematically compared. The following reasons might induce disagreement between the simulation results of different models: different representation of root growth, sink term of root water and solute uptake and representation of the rhizosphere. Presently, the extent of discrepancies is unknown, and a framework for quantitatively comparing functional-structural root architecture models is required. We propose, in a first step, to define benchmarking scenarios that test individual components of complex models: root architecture, water flow in soil and water flow in roots. While the latter two will focus mainly on comparing numerical aspects, the root architectural models have to be compared at a conceptual level as they generally differ in process representation. Therefore, defining common inputs that allow recreating reference root systems in all models will be a key challenge. In a second step, benchmarking scenarios for the coupled problems are defined. We expect that the results of step 1 will enable us to better interpret differences found in step 2. This benchmarking will result in a better understanding of the different models and contribute toward improving them. Improved models will allow us to simulate various scenarios with greater confidence and avoid bugs, numerical errors or conceptual misunderstandings. This work will set a standard for future model development. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7136536/ /pubmed/32296451 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00316 Text en Copyright © 2020 Schnepf, Black, Couvreur, Delory, Doussan, Koch, Koch, Javaux, Landl, Leitner, Lobet, Mai, Meunier, Petrich, Postma, Priesack, Schmidt, Vanderborght, Vereecken and Weber. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Plant Science Schnepf, Andrea Black, Christopher K. Couvreur, Valentin Delory, Benjamin M. Doussan, Claude Koch, Axelle Koch, Timo Javaux, Mathieu Landl, Magdalena Leitner, Daniel Lobet, Guillaume Mai, Trung Hieu Meunier, Félicien Petrich, Lukas Postma, Johannes A. Priesack, Eckart Schmidt, Volker Vanderborght, Jan Vereecken, Harry Weber, Matthias Call for Participation: Collaborative Benchmarking of Functional-Structural Root Architecture Models. The Case of Root Water Uptake |
title | Call for Participation: Collaborative Benchmarking of Functional-Structural Root Architecture Models. The Case of Root Water Uptake |
title_full | Call for Participation: Collaborative Benchmarking of Functional-Structural Root Architecture Models. The Case of Root Water Uptake |
title_fullStr | Call for Participation: Collaborative Benchmarking of Functional-Structural Root Architecture Models. The Case of Root Water Uptake |
title_full_unstemmed | Call for Participation: Collaborative Benchmarking of Functional-Structural Root Architecture Models. The Case of Root Water Uptake |
title_short | Call for Participation: Collaborative Benchmarking of Functional-Structural Root Architecture Models. The Case of Root Water Uptake |
title_sort | call for participation: collaborative benchmarking of functional-structural root architecture models. the case of root water uptake |
topic | Plant Science |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7136536/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32296451 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00316 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schnepfandrea callforparticipationcollaborativebenchmarkingoffunctionalstructuralrootarchitecturemodelsthecaseofrootwateruptake AT blackchristopherk callforparticipationcollaborativebenchmarkingoffunctionalstructuralrootarchitecturemodelsthecaseofrootwateruptake AT couvreurvalentin callforparticipationcollaborativebenchmarkingoffunctionalstructuralrootarchitecturemodelsthecaseofrootwateruptake AT delorybenjaminm callforparticipationcollaborativebenchmarkingoffunctionalstructuralrootarchitecturemodelsthecaseofrootwateruptake AT doussanclaude callforparticipationcollaborativebenchmarkingoffunctionalstructuralrootarchitecturemodelsthecaseofrootwateruptake AT kochaxelle callforparticipationcollaborativebenchmarkingoffunctionalstructuralrootarchitecturemodelsthecaseofrootwateruptake AT kochtimo callforparticipationcollaborativebenchmarkingoffunctionalstructuralrootarchitecturemodelsthecaseofrootwateruptake AT javauxmathieu callforparticipationcollaborativebenchmarkingoffunctionalstructuralrootarchitecturemodelsthecaseofrootwateruptake AT landlmagdalena callforparticipationcollaborativebenchmarkingoffunctionalstructuralrootarchitecturemodelsthecaseofrootwateruptake AT leitnerdaniel callforparticipationcollaborativebenchmarkingoffunctionalstructuralrootarchitecturemodelsthecaseofrootwateruptake AT lobetguillaume callforparticipationcollaborativebenchmarkingoffunctionalstructuralrootarchitecturemodelsthecaseofrootwateruptake AT maitrunghieu callforparticipationcollaborativebenchmarkingoffunctionalstructuralrootarchitecturemodelsthecaseofrootwateruptake AT meunierfelicien callforparticipationcollaborativebenchmarkingoffunctionalstructuralrootarchitecturemodelsthecaseofrootwateruptake AT petrichlukas callforparticipationcollaborativebenchmarkingoffunctionalstructuralrootarchitecturemodelsthecaseofrootwateruptake AT postmajohannesa callforparticipationcollaborativebenchmarkingoffunctionalstructuralrootarchitecturemodelsthecaseofrootwateruptake AT priesackeckart callforparticipationcollaborativebenchmarkingoffunctionalstructuralrootarchitecturemodelsthecaseofrootwateruptake AT schmidtvolker callforparticipationcollaborativebenchmarkingoffunctionalstructuralrootarchitecturemodelsthecaseofrootwateruptake AT vanderborghtjan callforparticipationcollaborativebenchmarkingoffunctionalstructuralrootarchitecturemodelsthecaseofrootwateruptake AT vereeckenharry callforparticipationcollaborativebenchmarkingoffunctionalstructuralrootarchitecturemodelsthecaseofrootwateruptake AT webermatthias callforparticipationcollaborativebenchmarkingoffunctionalstructuralrootarchitecturemodelsthecaseofrootwateruptake |