Cargando…
The safety of omitting prophylactic abdominal drainage after laparoscopic liver resection: Retrospective analysis of 100 consecutive cases
INTRODUCTION: Whether prophylactic abdominal drainage after laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) is necessary remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the safety of omitting prophylactic abdominal drainage after LLR. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 100 consecutive patients who underwent LLR...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7136585/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32280459 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2020.03.003 |
_version_ | 1783518282811179008 |
---|---|
author | Wakasugi, Masaki Shimizu, Junzo Makutani, Yusuke Koga, Chikato Murakami, Masahiro Furukawa, Haruna Sueda, Toshinori Matsumura, Tae Miyagaki, Hiromichi Tei, Mitsuyoshi Kawabata, Ryohei Hasegawa, Junichi |
author_facet | Wakasugi, Masaki Shimizu, Junzo Makutani, Yusuke Koga, Chikato Murakami, Masahiro Furukawa, Haruna Sueda, Toshinori Matsumura, Tae Miyagaki, Hiromichi Tei, Mitsuyoshi Kawabata, Ryohei Hasegawa, Junichi |
author_sort | Wakasugi, Masaki |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Whether prophylactic abdominal drainage after laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) is necessary remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the safety of omitting prophylactic abdominal drainage after LLR. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 100 consecutive patients who underwent LLR at Osaka Rosai Hospital from April 2011 to November 2018 was performed. During this period, prophylactic abdominal drainage was routinely omitted during LLR without biliary anastomosis. The primary endpoint was the frequency of additional abdominal drainage. The secondary endpoint was the rate of postoperative complications. RESULTS: Ninety-six patients (96%) underwent partial resection or lateral segmentectomy, and 89 patients (89%) were Child-Pugh grade A. The median operative time was 102 (range, 31–274) minutes. The median blood loss was minimal (range, 0–280 ml), and blood transfusion was performed for one patient (1%). One case (1%) was converted to open surgery. Additional abdominal drainage was required for one patient (1%) with an intraabdominal abscess. Postoperative complications were seen in 5 patients (5%). High-grade complications (≥grade III according to the Clavien-Dindo classification) were seen in two patients (2%). There were no cases of reoperation or perioperative death. The median postoperative hospital stay was 8 (range, 4–65) days. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic abdominal drainage could be safely omitted for selected patients and operative procedures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7136585 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71365852020-04-10 The safety of omitting prophylactic abdominal drainage after laparoscopic liver resection: Retrospective analysis of 100 consecutive cases Wakasugi, Masaki Shimizu, Junzo Makutani, Yusuke Koga, Chikato Murakami, Masahiro Furukawa, Haruna Sueda, Toshinori Matsumura, Tae Miyagaki, Hiromichi Tei, Mitsuyoshi Kawabata, Ryohei Hasegawa, Junichi Ann Med Surg (Lond) Case Report INTRODUCTION: Whether prophylactic abdominal drainage after laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) is necessary remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the safety of omitting prophylactic abdominal drainage after LLR. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 100 consecutive patients who underwent LLR at Osaka Rosai Hospital from April 2011 to November 2018 was performed. During this period, prophylactic abdominal drainage was routinely omitted during LLR without biliary anastomosis. The primary endpoint was the frequency of additional abdominal drainage. The secondary endpoint was the rate of postoperative complications. RESULTS: Ninety-six patients (96%) underwent partial resection or lateral segmentectomy, and 89 patients (89%) were Child-Pugh grade A. The median operative time was 102 (range, 31–274) minutes. The median blood loss was minimal (range, 0–280 ml), and blood transfusion was performed for one patient (1%). One case (1%) was converted to open surgery. Additional abdominal drainage was required for one patient (1%) with an intraabdominal abscess. Postoperative complications were seen in 5 patients (5%). High-grade complications (≥grade III according to the Clavien-Dindo classification) were seen in two patients (2%). There were no cases of reoperation or perioperative death. The median postoperative hospital stay was 8 (range, 4–65) days. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic abdominal drainage could be safely omitted for selected patients and operative procedures. Elsevier 2020-04-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7136585/ /pubmed/32280459 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2020.03.003 Text en © 2020 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Case Report Wakasugi, Masaki Shimizu, Junzo Makutani, Yusuke Koga, Chikato Murakami, Masahiro Furukawa, Haruna Sueda, Toshinori Matsumura, Tae Miyagaki, Hiromichi Tei, Mitsuyoshi Kawabata, Ryohei Hasegawa, Junichi The safety of omitting prophylactic abdominal drainage after laparoscopic liver resection: Retrospective analysis of 100 consecutive cases |
title | The safety of omitting prophylactic abdominal drainage after laparoscopic liver resection: Retrospective analysis of 100 consecutive cases |
title_full | The safety of omitting prophylactic abdominal drainage after laparoscopic liver resection: Retrospective analysis of 100 consecutive cases |
title_fullStr | The safety of omitting prophylactic abdominal drainage after laparoscopic liver resection: Retrospective analysis of 100 consecutive cases |
title_full_unstemmed | The safety of omitting prophylactic abdominal drainage after laparoscopic liver resection: Retrospective analysis of 100 consecutive cases |
title_short | The safety of omitting prophylactic abdominal drainage after laparoscopic liver resection: Retrospective analysis of 100 consecutive cases |
title_sort | safety of omitting prophylactic abdominal drainage after laparoscopic liver resection: retrospective analysis of 100 consecutive cases |
topic | Case Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7136585/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32280459 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2020.03.003 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wakasugimasaki thesafetyofomittingprophylacticabdominaldrainageafterlaparoscopicliverresectionretrospectiveanalysisof100consecutivecases AT shimizujunzo thesafetyofomittingprophylacticabdominaldrainageafterlaparoscopicliverresectionretrospectiveanalysisof100consecutivecases AT makutaniyusuke thesafetyofomittingprophylacticabdominaldrainageafterlaparoscopicliverresectionretrospectiveanalysisof100consecutivecases AT kogachikato thesafetyofomittingprophylacticabdominaldrainageafterlaparoscopicliverresectionretrospectiveanalysisof100consecutivecases AT murakamimasahiro thesafetyofomittingprophylacticabdominaldrainageafterlaparoscopicliverresectionretrospectiveanalysisof100consecutivecases AT furukawaharuna thesafetyofomittingprophylacticabdominaldrainageafterlaparoscopicliverresectionretrospectiveanalysisof100consecutivecases AT suedatoshinori thesafetyofomittingprophylacticabdominaldrainageafterlaparoscopicliverresectionretrospectiveanalysisof100consecutivecases AT matsumuratae thesafetyofomittingprophylacticabdominaldrainageafterlaparoscopicliverresectionretrospectiveanalysisof100consecutivecases AT miyagakihiromichi thesafetyofomittingprophylacticabdominaldrainageafterlaparoscopicliverresectionretrospectiveanalysisof100consecutivecases AT teimitsuyoshi thesafetyofomittingprophylacticabdominaldrainageafterlaparoscopicliverresectionretrospectiveanalysisof100consecutivecases AT kawabataryohei thesafetyofomittingprophylacticabdominaldrainageafterlaparoscopicliverresectionretrospectiveanalysisof100consecutivecases AT hasegawajunichi thesafetyofomittingprophylacticabdominaldrainageafterlaparoscopicliverresectionretrospectiveanalysisof100consecutivecases AT wakasugimasaki safetyofomittingprophylacticabdominaldrainageafterlaparoscopicliverresectionretrospectiveanalysisof100consecutivecases AT shimizujunzo safetyofomittingprophylacticabdominaldrainageafterlaparoscopicliverresectionretrospectiveanalysisof100consecutivecases AT makutaniyusuke safetyofomittingprophylacticabdominaldrainageafterlaparoscopicliverresectionretrospectiveanalysisof100consecutivecases AT kogachikato safetyofomittingprophylacticabdominaldrainageafterlaparoscopicliverresectionretrospectiveanalysisof100consecutivecases AT murakamimasahiro safetyofomittingprophylacticabdominaldrainageafterlaparoscopicliverresectionretrospectiveanalysisof100consecutivecases AT furukawaharuna safetyofomittingprophylacticabdominaldrainageafterlaparoscopicliverresectionretrospectiveanalysisof100consecutivecases AT suedatoshinori safetyofomittingprophylacticabdominaldrainageafterlaparoscopicliverresectionretrospectiveanalysisof100consecutivecases AT matsumuratae safetyofomittingprophylacticabdominaldrainageafterlaparoscopicliverresectionretrospectiveanalysisof100consecutivecases AT miyagakihiromichi safetyofomittingprophylacticabdominaldrainageafterlaparoscopicliverresectionretrospectiveanalysisof100consecutivecases AT teimitsuyoshi safetyofomittingprophylacticabdominaldrainageafterlaparoscopicliverresectionretrospectiveanalysisof100consecutivecases AT kawabataryohei safetyofomittingprophylacticabdominaldrainageafterlaparoscopicliverresectionretrospectiveanalysisof100consecutivecases AT hasegawajunichi safetyofomittingprophylacticabdominaldrainageafterlaparoscopicliverresectionretrospectiveanalysisof100consecutivecases |