Cargando…

Three-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Guiding Tibial and Femoral Tunnel Position in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Cadaveric Study

BACKGROUND: Femoral and tibial tunnel malposition for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) is correlated with higher failure rate. Regardless of the surgical technique used to create ACL tunnels, significant mismatches between the native and reconstructed footprints exist. PURPOSE:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marwan, Yousef, Böttcher, Jens, Laverdière, Carl, Jaffer, Rehana, Burman, Mark, Boily, Mathieu, Martineau, Paul A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7137122/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32284939
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967120909913
_version_ 1783518365345644544
author Marwan, Yousef
Böttcher, Jens
Laverdière, Carl
Jaffer, Rehana
Burman, Mark
Boily, Mathieu
Martineau, Paul A.
author_facet Marwan, Yousef
Böttcher, Jens
Laverdière, Carl
Jaffer, Rehana
Burman, Mark
Boily, Mathieu
Martineau, Paul A.
author_sort Marwan, Yousef
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Femoral and tibial tunnel malposition for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) is correlated with higher failure rate. Regardless of the surgical technique used to create ACL tunnels, significant mismatches between the native and reconstructed footprints exist. PURPOSE: To compare the position of tunnels created by a standard technique with the ones created based on preoperative 3-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging (3D MRI) measurements of the ACL anatomic footprint. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Using 3D MRI, the native ACL footprints were identified. Tunnels were created on 16 knees (8 cadavers) arthroscopically. On one knee of a matched pair, the tunnels were created based on 3D MRI measurements that were provided to the surgeon (roadmapped technique), while on the contralateral knee, the tunnels were created based on a standard anatomic ACLR technique. The technique was randomly assigned per set of knees. Postoperatively, the positions of the tunnels were measured using 3D MRI. RESULTS: On the tibial side, the median distance between the center of the native and reconstructed ACL footprints in relation to the root of the anterior horn of the lateral meniscus medially was 1.7 ± 2.2 mm and 1.9 ± 2.8 mm for the standard and roadmapped techniques, respectively (P = .442), while the median anteroposterior distance was 3.4 ± 2.4 mm and 2.5 ± 2.5 mm for the standard and roadmapped techniques, respectively (P = .161). On the femoral side, the median distance in relation to the apex of the deep cartilage (ADC) distally was 0.9 ± 2.8 mm and 1.3 ± 2.1 mm for the standard and roadmapped techniques, respectively (P = .195), while the median distance anteriorly from the ADC was 1.2 ± 1.3 mm and 4.6 ± 4.5 mm for the standard and roadmapped techniques, respectively (P = .007). CONCLUSION: Providing precise radiological measurements of the ACL footprints does not improve the surgeon’s ability to position the tunnels. Future studies should continue to attempt to provide tools to improve the tunnel position in ACLR. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This cadaveric study indicates that despite the use of 3D MRI in understanding the ACL anatomy, re-creating the native ACL footprints remains a challenge.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7137122
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71371222020-04-13 Three-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Guiding Tibial and Femoral Tunnel Position in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Cadaveric Study Marwan, Yousef Böttcher, Jens Laverdière, Carl Jaffer, Rehana Burman, Mark Boily, Mathieu Martineau, Paul A. Orthop J Sports Med Article BACKGROUND: Femoral and tibial tunnel malposition for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) is correlated with higher failure rate. Regardless of the surgical technique used to create ACL tunnels, significant mismatches between the native and reconstructed footprints exist. PURPOSE: To compare the position of tunnels created by a standard technique with the ones created based on preoperative 3-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging (3D MRI) measurements of the ACL anatomic footprint. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Using 3D MRI, the native ACL footprints were identified. Tunnels were created on 16 knees (8 cadavers) arthroscopically. On one knee of a matched pair, the tunnels were created based on 3D MRI measurements that were provided to the surgeon (roadmapped technique), while on the contralateral knee, the tunnels were created based on a standard anatomic ACLR technique. The technique was randomly assigned per set of knees. Postoperatively, the positions of the tunnels were measured using 3D MRI. RESULTS: On the tibial side, the median distance between the center of the native and reconstructed ACL footprints in relation to the root of the anterior horn of the lateral meniscus medially was 1.7 ± 2.2 mm and 1.9 ± 2.8 mm for the standard and roadmapped techniques, respectively (P = .442), while the median anteroposterior distance was 3.4 ± 2.4 mm and 2.5 ± 2.5 mm for the standard and roadmapped techniques, respectively (P = .161). On the femoral side, the median distance in relation to the apex of the deep cartilage (ADC) distally was 0.9 ± 2.8 mm and 1.3 ± 2.1 mm for the standard and roadmapped techniques, respectively (P = .195), while the median distance anteriorly from the ADC was 1.2 ± 1.3 mm and 4.6 ± 4.5 mm for the standard and roadmapped techniques, respectively (P = .007). CONCLUSION: Providing precise radiological measurements of the ACL footprints does not improve the surgeon’s ability to position the tunnels. Future studies should continue to attempt to provide tools to improve the tunnel position in ACLR. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This cadaveric study indicates that despite the use of 3D MRI in understanding the ACL anatomy, re-creating the native ACL footprints remains a challenge. SAGE Publications 2020-03-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7137122/ /pubmed/32284939 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967120909913 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
Marwan, Yousef
Böttcher, Jens
Laverdière, Carl
Jaffer, Rehana
Burman, Mark
Boily, Mathieu
Martineau, Paul A.
Three-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Guiding Tibial and Femoral Tunnel Position in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Cadaveric Study
title Three-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Guiding Tibial and Femoral Tunnel Position in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Cadaveric Study
title_full Three-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Guiding Tibial and Femoral Tunnel Position in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Cadaveric Study
title_fullStr Three-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Guiding Tibial and Femoral Tunnel Position in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Cadaveric Study
title_full_unstemmed Three-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Guiding Tibial and Femoral Tunnel Position in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Cadaveric Study
title_short Three-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Guiding Tibial and Femoral Tunnel Position in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Cadaveric Study
title_sort three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging for guiding tibial and femoral tunnel position in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cadaveric study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7137122/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32284939
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967120909913
work_keys_str_mv AT marwanyousef threedimensionalmagneticresonanceimagingforguidingtibialandfemoraltunnelpositioninanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionacadavericstudy
AT bottcherjens threedimensionalmagneticresonanceimagingforguidingtibialandfemoraltunnelpositioninanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionacadavericstudy
AT laverdierecarl threedimensionalmagneticresonanceimagingforguidingtibialandfemoraltunnelpositioninanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionacadavericstudy
AT jafferrehana threedimensionalmagneticresonanceimagingforguidingtibialandfemoraltunnelpositioninanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionacadavericstudy
AT burmanmark threedimensionalmagneticresonanceimagingforguidingtibialandfemoraltunnelpositioninanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionacadavericstudy
AT boilymathieu threedimensionalmagneticresonanceimagingforguidingtibialandfemoraltunnelpositioninanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionacadavericstudy
AT martineaupaula threedimensionalmagneticresonanceimagingforguidingtibialandfemoraltunnelpositioninanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionacadavericstudy