Cargando…

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma – influence of resection margin and tumor distance to the liver capsule on survival

BACKGROUND: Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is often diagnosed in advanced stage. Aim of this study was to analyse the influence of resection margins and tumor distance to the liver capsule on survival and recurrence in a single center with a high number of extended resections. METHODS: From J...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bartsch, Fabian, Baumgart, Janine, Hoppe-Lotichius, Maria, Straub, Beate K., Heinrich, Stefan, Lang, Hauke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7137203/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32252724
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-020-00718-7
_version_ 1783518378718134272
author Bartsch, Fabian
Baumgart, Janine
Hoppe-Lotichius, Maria
Straub, Beate K.
Heinrich, Stefan
Lang, Hauke
author_facet Bartsch, Fabian
Baumgart, Janine
Hoppe-Lotichius, Maria
Straub, Beate K.
Heinrich, Stefan
Lang, Hauke
author_sort Bartsch, Fabian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is often diagnosed in advanced stage. Aim of this study was to analyse the influence of resection margins and tumor distance to the liver capsule on survival and recurrence in a single center with a high number of extended resections. METHODS: From January 2008 to June 2018 data of all patients with ICC were collected and further analysed with Kaplan Meier Model, Cox regression or Chi(2) test for categorical data. RESULTS: Out of 210 included patients 150 underwent curative intended resection (71.4%). Most patients required extended resections (n = 77; 51.3%). R0-resection was achieved in 131 patients (87.3%) with minimal distances to the resection margin > 1 cm in 22, 0.5-1 cm in 11, 0.1–0.5 cm in 49 patients, and <  0.1 cm in 49 patients. Overall survival (OS) for margins > 0.5 cm compared to 0.5–0.1 cm or R1 was better, but without reaching significance. All three groups had significantly better OS compared to the irresectable group. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was also better in patients with a margin > 0.5 cm than in the < 0.5–0.1 cm or the R1-group, but even without reaching significance. Different distance to the liver capsule significantly affected OS, but not RFS. CONCLUSIONS: Wide resection margins (> 0.5 cm) should be targeted but did not show significantly better OS or RFS in a cohort with a high percentage of extended resections (> 50%). Wide margins, narrow margins and even R1 resections showed a significant benefit over the irresectable group. Therefore, extended resections should be performed, even if only narrow margins can be achieved.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7137203
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71372032020-04-11 Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma – influence of resection margin and tumor distance to the liver capsule on survival Bartsch, Fabian Baumgart, Janine Hoppe-Lotichius, Maria Straub, Beate K. Heinrich, Stefan Lang, Hauke BMC Surg Research Article BACKGROUND: Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is often diagnosed in advanced stage. Aim of this study was to analyse the influence of resection margins and tumor distance to the liver capsule on survival and recurrence in a single center with a high number of extended resections. METHODS: From January 2008 to June 2018 data of all patients with ICC were collected and further analysed with Kaplan Meier Model, Cox regression or Chi(2) test for categorical data. RESULTS: Out of 210 included patients 150 underwent curative intended resection (71.4%). Most patients required extended resections (n = 77; 51.3%). R0-resection was achieved in 131 patients (87.3%) with minimal distances to the resection margin > 1 cm in 22, 0.5-1 cm in 11, 0.1–0.5 cm in 49 patients, and <  0.1 cm in 49 patients. Overall survival (OS) for margins > 0.5 cm compared to 0.5–0.1 cm or R1 was better, but without reaching significance. All three groups had significantly better OS compared to the irresectable group. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was also better in patients with a margin > 0.5 cm than in the < 0.5–0.1 cm or the R1-group, but even without reaching significance. Different distance to the liver capsule significantly affected OS, but not RFS. CONCLUSIONS: Wide resection margins (> 0.5 cm) should be targeted but did not show significantly better OS or RFS in a cohort with a high percentage of extended resections (> 50%). Wide margins, narrow margins and even R1 resections showed a significant benefit over the irresectable group. Therefore, extended resections should be performed, even if only narrow margins can be achieved. BioMed Central 2020-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7137203/ /pubmed/32252724 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-020-00718-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bartsch, Fabian
Baumgart, Janine
Hoppe-Lotichius, Maria
Straub, Beate K.
Heinrich, Stefan
Lang, Hauke
Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma – influence of resection margin and tumor distance to the liver capsule on survival
title Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma – influence of resection margin and tumor distance to the liver capsule on survival
title_full Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma – influence of resection margin and tumor distance to the liver capsule on survival
title_fullStr Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma – influence of resection margin and tumor distance to the liver capsule on survival
title_full_unstemmed Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma – influence of resection margin and tumor distance to the liver capsule on survival
title_short Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma – influence of resection margin and tumor distance to the liver capsule on survival
title_sort intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma – influence of resection margin and tumor distance to the liver capsule on survival
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7137203/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32252724
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-020-00718-7
work_keys_str_mv AT bartschfabian intrahepaticcholangiocarcinomainfluenceofresectionmarginandtumordistancetothelivercapsuleonsurvival
AT baumgartjanine intrahepaticcholangiocarcinomainfluenceofresectionmarginandtumordistancetothelivercapsuleonsurvival
AT hoppelotichiusmaria intrahepaticcholangiocarcinomainfluenceofresectionmarginandtumordistancetothelivercapsuleonsurvival
AT straubbeatek intrahepaticcholangiocarcinomainfluenceofresectionmarginandtumordistancetothelivercapsuleonsurvival
AT heinrichstefan intrahepaticcholangiocarcinomainfluenceofresectionmarginandtumordistancetothelivercapsuleonsurvival
AT langhauke intrahepaticcholangiocarcinomainfluenceofresectionmarginandtumordistancetothelivercapsuleonsurvival