Cargando…
Core conflictual relationship theme: the reliability of a simplified scoring procedure
BACKGROUND: Creating a case formulation is an important and basic skill in psychotherapy meant to guide treatment. A patient’s interpersonal pattern is an essential part of a case formulation. Core Conflictual Relationship Theme (CCRT) is a well-known structured method to describe interpersonal patt...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7137424/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32252696 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-020-02558-4 |
_version_ | 1783518424695046144 |
---|---|
author | Tallberg, Peter Ulberg, Randi Johnsen Dahl, Hanne-Sofie Høglend, Per Andreas |
author_facet | Tallberg, Peter Ulberg, Randi Johnsen Dahl, Hanne-Sofie Høglend, Per Andreas |
author_sort | Tallberg, Peter |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Creating a case formulation is an important and basic skill in psychotherapy meant to guide treatment. A patient’s interpersonal pattern is an essential part of a case formulation. Core Conflictual Relationship Theme (CCRT) is a well-known structured method to describe interpersonal patterns. The CCRT method is based on the assumption that humans display a central relationship theme, which is shown in most relationships as well as in the patient-therapist relation. The CCRT scoring is based on how the patient describes interactions with others, in therapy sessions or in a specific interview. These descriptions are transcribed. Raters then score the identified relational episodes by choosing elements from the clustered categories of Wishes, Response from Others and Response from Self. The method has shown high validity and reliability. Inter rater reliability is generally good: Cohen’s kappa ranging from 0.55 to 0.70. To decide CCRT pattern from transcribed material is time consuming and labour intensive This study investigates a labour- and timesaving version of the method. METHODS: This study aimed to investigate rater agreement in a simplified method of scoring the CCRT, based directly on live semi-structured dynamic interviews without transcribing the material. Fifty-two patients referred for psychotherapy in a clinical trial, were scored for CCRT pattern. Based on information that came forth during the two-hour interview, raters scored the patients choosing elements from the clustered categories of Wishes, Response from Others and Response from Self. More than one category in each component could be chosen without ranking. Five raters compared two by two were investigated. Inter rater reliability was measured by Cohen’s kappa. RESULTS: Mean kappa for Wishes, Response from Others and Response from Self was .33, .41 and .45 respectively. Mean kappa for CCRT in total was .41 among 5 raters. CONCLUSION: In this simplified method to score the CCRT based on oral dynamic interviews, fair to moderate IRR was obtained. TRIAL REGISTRATION: First Experimental Study of Transference-interpretations (FEST307/95). Registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00423462. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7137424 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71374242020-04-11 Core conflictual relationship theme: the reliability of a simplified scoring procedure Tallberg, Peter Ulberg, Randi Johnsen Dahl, Hanne-Sofie Høglend, Per Andreas BMC Psychiatry Research Article BACKGROUND: Creating a case formulation is an important and basic skill in psychotherapy meant to guide treatment. A patient’s interpersonal pattern is an essential part of a case formulation. Core Conflictual Relationship Theme (CCRT) is a well-known structured method to describe interpersonal patterns. The CCRT method is based on the assumption that humans display a central relationship theme, which is shown in most relationships as well as in the patient-therapist relation. The CCRT scoring is based on how the patient describes interactions with others, in therapy sessions or in a specific interview. These descriptions are transcribed. Raters then score the identified relational episodes by choosing elements from the clustered categories of Wishes, Response from Others and Response from Self. The method has shown high validity and reliability. Inter rater reliability is generally good: Cohen’s kappa ranging from 0.55 to 0.70. To decide CCRT pattern from transcribed material is time consuming and labour intensive This study investigates a labour- and timesaving version of the method. METHODS: This study aimed to investigate rater agreement in a simplified method of scoring the CCRT, based directly on live semi-structured dynamic interviews without transcribing the material. Fifty-two patients referred for psychotherapy in a clinical trial, were scored for CCRT pattern. Based on information that came forth during the two-hour interview, raters scored the patients choosing elements from the clustered categories of Wishes, Response from Others and Response from Self. More than one category in each component could be chosen without ranking. Five raters compared two by two were investigated. Inter rater reliability was measured by Cohen’s kappa. RESULTS: Mean kappa for Wishes, Response from Others and Response from Self was .33, .41 and .45 respectively. Mean kappa for CCRT in total was .41 among 5 raters. CONCLUSION: In this simplified method to score the CCRT based on oral dynamic interviews, fair to moderate IRR was obtained. TRIAL REGISTRATION: First Experimental Study of Transference-interpretations (FEST307/95). Registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00423462. BioMed Central 2020-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7137424/ /pubmed/32252696 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-020-02558-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Tallberg, Peter Ulberg, Randi Johnsen Dahl, Hanne-Sofie Høglend, Per Andreas Core conflictual relationship theme: the reliability of a simplified scoring procedure |
title | Core conflictual relationship theme: the reliability of a simplified scoring procedure |
title_full | Core conflictual relationship theme: the reliability of a simplified scoring procedure |
title_fullStr | Core conflictual relationship theme: the reliability of a simplified scoring procedure |
title_full_unstemmed | Core conflictual relationship theme: the reliability of a simplified scoring procedure |
title_short | Core conflictual relationship theme: the reliability of a simplified scoring procedure |
title_sort | core conflictual relationship theme: the reliability of a simplified scoring procedure |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7137424/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32252696 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-020-02558-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tallbergpeter coreconflictualrelationshipthemethereliabilityofasimplifiedscoringprocedure AT ulbergrandi coreconflictualrelationshipthemethereliabilityofasimplifiedscoringprocedure AT johnsendahlhannesofie coreconflictualrelationshipthemethereliabilityofasimplifiedscoringprocedure AT høglendperandreas coreconflictualrelationshipthemethereliabilityofasimplifiedscoringprocedure |