Cargando…

Psychological distress among carers and the moderating effects of social support

BACKGROUND: Carers provide both practical and emotional support and often play an important role in coordination of care for recipients. The demands of caring may lead to increased levels of stress for the carer, which can affect mental health and quality of life. This study examined the relationshi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: George, Emma S., Kecmanovic, Milica, Meade, Tanya, Kolt, Gregory S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7137514/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32252700
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-020-02571-7
_version_ 1783518443579899904
author George, Emma S.
Kecmanovic, Milica
Meade, Tanya
Kolt, Gregory S.
author_facet George, Emma S.
Kecmanovic, Milica
Meade, Tanya
Kolt, Gregory S.
author_sort George, Emma S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Carers provide both practical and emotional support and often play an important role in coordination of care for recipients. The demands of caring may lead to increased levels of stress for the carer, which can affect mental health and quality of life. This study examined the relationship between being a carer and psychological distress (assessed using the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale [K10]), and explored the moderating effect of social support in that relationship using a large sample. METHODS: The study used data from the 45 and Up study, a large cohort study of individuals aged 45 years and over in New South Wales, Australia, and applied multiple regression methods and moderation analysis. The sample for the current study comprised 267,041 participants drawn from the baseline dataset, with valid data on the primary outcome (carer status). RESULTS: The mean age of participants was 62.73 (±11.18) years, and 4.23% and 7.13% were identified as full-time and part-time carers, respectively. Compared to non-carers, full-time carers had K10 scores that were on average, higher by 1.87, while part-time carers’ K10 scores were on average higher by 1.60 points. A perception of social support reduced the strength of the relationship between carer status and psychological distress by 40% for full-time carers and 60% for part-time carers. CONCLUSIONS: The findings have important implications, for both prevention and treatment of psychological problems among carers. In terms of prevention, they suggest that public health campaigns focused on increasing awareness regarding the psychological burden faced by carers would be useful. In terms of intervention, potential treatments that focus on improving social support networks may be helpful. The results are particularly important in the current context of an ageing population in Australian and other developed countries, where caregiving is likely to play an increasing role in the care and support services.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7137514
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71375142020-04-11 Psychological distress among carers and the moderating effects of social support George, Emma S. Kecmanovic, Milica Meade, Tanya Kolt, Gregory S. BMC Psychiatry Research Article BACKGROUND: Carers provide both practical and emotional support and often play an important role in coordination of care for recipients. The demands of caring may lead to increased levels of stress for the carer, which can affect mental health and quality of life. This study examined the relationship between being a carer and psychological distress (assessed using the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale [K10]), and explored the moderating effect of social support in that relationship using a large sample. METHODS: The study used data from the 45 and Up study, a large cohort study of individuals aged 45 years and over in New South Wales, Australia, and applied multiple regression methods and moderation analysis. The sample for the current study comprised 267,041 participants drawn from the baseline dataset, with valid data on the primary outcome (carer status). RESULTS: The mean age of participants was 62.73 (±11.18) years, and 4.23% and 7.13% were identified as full-time and part-time carers, respectively. Compared to non-carers, full-time carers had K10 scores that were on average, higher by 1.87, while part-time carers’ K10 scores were on average higher by 1.60 points. A perception of social support reduced the strength of the relationship between carer status and psychological distress by 40% for full-time carers and 60% for part-time carers. CONCLUSIONS: The findings have important implications, for both prevention and treatment of psychological problems among carers. In terms of prevention, they suggest that public health campaigns focused on increasing awareness regarding the psychological burden faced by carers would be useful. In terms of intervention, potential treatments that focus on improving social support networks may be helpful. The results are particularly important in the current context of an ageing population in Australian and other developed countries, where caregiving is likely to play an increasing role in the care and support services. BioMed Central 2020-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7137514/ /pubmed/32252700 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-020-02571-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
George, Emma S.
Kecmanovic, Milica
Meade, Tanya
Kolt, Gregory S.
Psychological distress among carers and the moderating effects of social support
title Psychological distress among carers and the moderating effects of social support
title_full Psychological distress among carers and the moderating effects of social support
title_fullStr Psychological distress among carers and the moderating effects of social support
title_full_unstemmed Psychological distress among carers and the moderating effects of social support
title_short Psychological distress among carers and the moderating effects of social support
title_sort psychological distress among carers and the moderating effects of social support
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7137514/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32252700
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-020-02571-7
work_keys_str_mv AT georgeemmas psychologicaldistressamongcarersandthemoderatingeffectsofsocialsupport
AT kecmanovicmilica psychologicaldistressamongcarersandthemoderatingeffectsofsocialsupport
AT meadetanya psychologicaldistressamongcarersandthemoderatingeffectsofsocialsupport
AT koltgregorys psychologicaldistressamongcarersandthemoderatingeffectsofsocialsupport