Cargando…

Sensitivity and specificity of a low-cost screening protocol for identifying children at risk for language disorders

OBJECTIVES: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of a low-cost screening test for identifying children at risk for language disorders with that of a specific language assessment. METHODS: The study was conducted during a polio vaccination campaign in basic health units in western São Paulo, Brazil. Th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dias, Daniela Cardilli, Rondon-Melo, Silmara, Molini-Avejonas, Daniela Regina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Faculdade de Medicina / USP 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7137860/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32294668
http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2020/e1426
_version_ 1783518490732265472
author Dias, Daniela Cardilli
Rondon-Melo, Silmara
Molini-Avejonas, Daniela Regina
author_facet Dias, Daniela Cardilli
Rondon-Melo, Silmara
Molini-Avejonas, Daniela Regina
author_sort Dias, Daniela Cardilli
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of a low-cost screening test for identifying children at risk for language disorders with that of a specific language assessment. METHODS: The study was conducted during a polio vaccination campaign in basic health units in western São Paulo, Brazil. The parents/guardians of 1000 children aged between 0 and 5 years were asked to answer questions of a specific screening test. The instrument consisted of a uniform set of questions about the main milestones in language development (from 0 to 5 years of age) with scaled scores to assess responses. There were no exclusion criteria. After the screening test, the children were referred to a specific language assessment by ABFW, following a determined flow of referrals. The results obtained in the screening were compared to those obtained in the specific language assessment; then, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values were determined for the screening test. Children who failed the screening test also underwent an audiological evaluation. The statistical significance was set at 5%. RESULTS: The majority of the participants were aged between 4 and 5 years (21.82%) and were male (51.6%). The sensitivity and specificity values were 82.5% and 98.93%, respectively. The area under the curve was 0.907 (0.887–0.925), and the screening test showed 96% accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: The screening test showed high diagnostic efficiency in determining the risk of language disorders in children aged between 0 and 5 years.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7137860
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Faculdade de Medicina / USP
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71378602020-04-17 Sensitivity and specificity of a low-cost screening protocol for identifying children at risk for language disorders Dias, Daniela Cardilli Rondon-Melo, Silmara Molini-Avejonas, Daniela Regina Clinics (Sao Paulo) Original Article OBJECTIVES: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of a low-cost screening test for identifying children at risk for language disorders with that of a specific language assessment. METHODS: The study was conducted during a polio vaccination campaign in basic health units in western São Paulo, Brazil. The parents/guardians of 1000 children aged between 0 and 5 years were asked to answer questions of a specific screening test. The instrument consisted of a uniform set of questions about the main milestones in language development (from 0 to 5 years of age) with scaled scores to assess responses. There were no exclusion criteria. After the screening test, the children were referred to a specific language assessment by ABFW, following a determined flow of referrals. The results obtained in the screening were compared to those obtained in the specific language assessment; then, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values were determined for the screening test. Children who failed the screening test also underwent an audiological evaluation. The statistical significance was set at 5%. RESULTS: The majority of the participants were aged between 4 and 5 years (21.82%) and were male (51.6%). The sensitivity and specificity values were 82.5% and 98.93%, respectively. The area under the curve was 0.907 (0.887–0.925), and the screening test showed 96% accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: The screening test showed high diagnostic efficiency in determining the risk of language disorders in children aged between 0 and 5 years. Faculdade de Medicina / USP 2020-04-06 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7137860/ /pubmed/32294668 http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2020/e1426 Text en Copyright © 2020 CLINICS http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Dias, Daniela Cardilli
Rondon-Melo, Silmara
Molini-Avejonas, Daniela Regina
Sensitivity and specificity of a low-cost screening protocol for identifying children at risk for language disorders
title Sensitivity and specificity of a low-cost screening protocol for identifying children at risk for language disorders
title_full Sensitivity and specificity of a low-cost screening protocol for identifying children at risk for language disorders
title_fullStr Sensitivity and specificity of a low-cost screening protocol for identifying children at risk for language disorders
title_full_unstemmed Sensitivity and specificity of a low-cost screening protocol for identifying children at risk for language disorders
title_short Sensitivity and specificity of a low-cost screening protocol for identifying children at risk for language disorders
title_sort sensitivity and specificity of a low-cost screening protocol for identifying children at risk for language disorders
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7137860/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32294668
http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2020/e1426
work_keys_str_mv AT diasdanielacardilli sensitivityandspecificityofalowcostscreeningprotocolforidentifyingchildrenatriskforlanguagedisorders
AT rondonmelosilmara sensitivityandspecificityofalowcostscreeningprotocolforidentifyingchildrenatriskforlanguagedisorders
AT moliniavejonasdanielaregina sensitivityandspecificityofalowcostscreeningprotocolforidentifyingchildrenatriskforlanguagedisorders