Cargando…

Baboon thanatology: responses of filial and non-filial group members to infants' corpses

What do animals know of death? What can animals' responses to death tell us about the evolution of species’ minds, and the origins of humans' awareness of death and dying? A recent surge in interest in comparative thanatology may provide beginnings of answers to these questions. Here, we a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carter, Alecia J., Baniel, Alice, Cowlishaw, Guy, Huchard, Elise
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7137963/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32269818
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.192206
_version_ 1783518511472050176
author Carter, Alecia J.
Baniel, Alice
Cowlishaw, Guy
Huchard, Elise
author_facet Carter, Alecia J.
Baniel, Alice
Cowlishaw, Guy
Huchard, Elise
author_sort Carter, Alecia J.
collection PubMed
description What do animals know of death? What can animals' responses to death tell us about the evolution of species’ minds, and the origins of humans' awareness of death and dying? A recent surge in interest in comparative thanatology may provide beginnings of answers to these questions. Here, we add to the comparative thanatology literature by reporting 12 cases of group members' responses to infants’ deaths, including 1 miscarriage and 2 stillbirths, recorded over 13 years in wild Namibian chacma baboons. Wild baboons' responses to dead infants were similar to other primates: in general, the mother of the infant carried the infants’ corpse for varying lengths of time (less than 1 h to 10 days) and tended to groom the corpses frequently, though, as in other studies, considerable individual differences were observed. However, we have not yet observed any corpse carriage of very long duration (i.e. greater than 20 days), which, though rare, occurs in other Old World monkeys and chimpanzees. We hypothesize this is due to the costs of carrying the corpse over the greater daily distances travelled by the Tsaobis baboons. Additionally, in contrast to other case reports, we observed male friends' ‘protection’ of the infant corpse on three occasions. We discuss the implications of these reports for current questions in the field.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7137963
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The Royal Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71379632020-04-08 Baboon thanatology: responses of filial and non-filial group members to infants' corpses Carter, Alecia J. Baniel, Alice Cowlishaw, Guy Huchard, Elise R Soc Open Sci Organismal and Evolutionary Biology What do animals know of death? What can animals' responses to death tell us about the evolution of species’ minds, and the origins of humans' awareness of death and dying? A recent surge in interest in comparative thanatology may provide beginnings of answers to these questions. Here, we add to the comparative thanatology literature by reporting 12 cases of group members' responses to infants’ deaths, including 1 miscarriage and 2 stillbirths, recorded over 13 years in wild Namibian chacma baboons. Wild baboons' responses to dead infants were similar to other primates: in general, the mother of the infant carried the infants’ corpse for varying lengths of time (less than 1 h to 10 days) and tended to groom the corpses frequently, though, as in other studies, considerable individual differences were observed. However, we have not yet observed any corpse carriage of very long duration (i.e. greater than 20 days), which, though rare, occurs in other Old World monkeys and chimpanzees. We hypothesize this is due to the costs of carrying the corpse over the greater daily distances travelled by the Tsaobis baboons. Additionally, in contrast to other case reports, we observed male friends' ‘protection’ of the infant corpse on three occasions. We discuss the implications of these reports for current questions in the field. The Royal Society 2020-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7137963/ /pubmed/32269818 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.192206 Text en © 2020 The Authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Organismal and Evolutionary Biology
Carter, Alecia J.
Baniel, Alice
Cowlishaw, Guy
Huchard, Elise
Baboon thanatology: responses of filial and non-filial group members to infants' corpses
title Baboon thanatology: responses of filial and non-filial group members to infants' corpses
title_full Baboon thanatology: responses of filial and non-filial group members to infants' corpses
title_fullStr Baboon thanatology: responses of filial and non-filial group members to infants' corpses
title_full_unstemmed Baboon thanatology: responses of filial and non-filial group members to infants' corpses
title_short Baboon thanatology: responses of filial and non-filial group members to infants' corpses
title_sort baboon thanatology: responses of filial and non-filial group members to infants' corpses
topic Organismal and Evolutionary Biology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7137963/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32269818
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.192206
work_keys_str_mv AT carteraleciaj baboonthanatologyresponsesoffilialandnonfilialgroupmemberstoinfantscorpses
AT banielalice baboonthanatologyresponsesoffilialandnonfilialgroupmemberstoinfantscorpses
AT cowlishawguy baboonthanatologyresponsesoffilialandnonfilialgroupmemberstoinfantscorpses
AT huchardelise baboonthanatologyresponsesoffilialandnonfilialgroupmemberstoinfantscorpses