Cargando…

The mark of captivity: plastic responses in the ankle bone of a wild ungulate (Sus scrofa)

Deciphering the plastic (non-heritable) changes induced by human control over wild animals in the archaeological record is challenging. We hypothesized that changes in locomotor behaviour in a wild ungulate due to mobility control could be quantified in the bone anatomy. To test this, we experimente...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harbers, Hugo, Neaux, Dimitri, Ortiz, Katia, Blanc, Barbara, Laurens, Flavie, Baly, Isabelle, Callou, Cécile, Schafberg, Renate, Haruda, Ashleigh, Lecompte, François, Casabianca, François, Studer, Jacqueline, Renaud, Sabrina, Cornette, Raphael, Locatelli, Yann, Vigne, Jean-Denis, Herrel, Anthony, Cucchi, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7137979/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32269811
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.192039
_version_ 1783518515344441344
author Harbers, Hugo
Neaux, Dimitri
Ortiz, Katia
Blanc, Barbara
Laurens, Flavie
Baly, Isabelle
Callou, Cécile
Schafberg, Renate
Haruda, Ashleigh
Lecompte, François
Casabianca, François
Studer, Jacqueline
Renaud, Sabrina
Cornette, Raphael
Locatelli, Yann
Vigne, Jean-Denis
Herrel, Anthony
Cucchi, Thomas
author_facet Harbers, Hugo
Neaux, Dimitri
Ortiz, Katia
Blanc, Barbara
Laurens, Flavie
Baly, Isabelle
Callou, Cécile
Schafberg, Renate
Haruda, Ashleigh
Lecompte, François
Casabianca, François
Studer, Jacqueline
Renaud, Sabrina
Cornette, Raphael
Locatelli, Yann
Vigne, Jean-Denis
Herrel, Anthony
Cucchi, Thomas
author_sort Harbers, Hugo
collection PubMed
description Deciphering the plastic (non-heritable) changes induced by human control over wild animals in the archaeological record is challenging. We hypothesized that changes in locomotor behaviour in a wild ungulate due to mobility control could be quantified in the bone anatomy. To test this, we experimented with the effect of mobility reduction on the skeleton of wild boar (Sus scrofa), using the calcaneus shape as a possible phenotypic marker. We first assessed differences in shape variation and covariation in captive-reared and wild-caught wild boars, taking into account differences in sex, body mass, available space for movement and muscle force. This plastic signal was then contrasted with the phenotypic changes induced by selective breeding in domestic pigs. We found that mobility reduction induces a plastic response beyond the shape variation of wild boars in their natural habitat, associated with a reduction in the range of locomotor behaviours and muscle loads. This plastic signal of captivity in the calcaneus shape differs from the main changes induced by selective breeding for larger muscle and earlier development that impacted the pigs' calcaneus shape in a much greater extent than the mobility reduction during the domestication process of their wild ancestors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7137979
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The Royal Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71379792020-04-08 The mark of captivity: plastic responses in the ankle bone of a wild ungulate (Sus scrofa) Harbers, Hugo Neaux, Dimitri Ortiz, Katia Blanc, Barbara Laurens, Flavie Baly, Isabelle Callou, Cécile Schafberg, Renate Haruda, Ashleigh Lecompte, François Casabianca, François Studer, Jacqueline Renaud, Sabrina Cornette, Raphael Locatelli, Yann Vigne, Jean-Denis Herrel, Anthony Cucchi, Thomas R Soc Open Sci Organismal and Evolutionary Biology Deciphering the plastic (non-heritable) changes induced by human control over wild animals in the archaeological record is challenging. We hypothesized that changes in locomotor behaviour in a wild ungulate due to mobility control could be quantified in the bone anatomy. To test this, we experimented with the effect of mobility reduction on the skeleton of wild boar (Sus scrofa), using the calcaneus shape as a possible phenotypic marker. We first assessed differences in shape variation and covariation in captive-reared and wild-caught wild boars, taking into account differences in sex, body mass, available space for movement and muscle force. This plastic signal was then contrasted with the phenotypic changes induced by selective breeding in domestic pigs. We found that mobility reduction induces a plastic response beyond the shape variation of wild boars in their natural habitat, associated with a reduction in the range of locomotor behaviours and muscle loads. This plastic signal of captivity in the calcaneus shape differs from the main changes induced by selective breeding for larger muscle and earlier development that impacted the pigs' calcaneus shape in a much greater extent than the mobility reduction during the domestication process of their wild ancestors. The Royal Society 2020-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7137979/ /pubmed/32269811 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.192039 Text en © 2020 The Authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Organismal and Evolutionary Biology
Harbers, Hugo
Neaux, Dimitri
Ortiz, Katia
Blanc, Barbara
Laurens, Flavie
Baly, Isabelle
Callou, Cécile
Schafberg, Renate
Haruda, Ashleigh
Lecompte, François
Casabianca, François
Studer, Jacqueline
Renaud, Sabrina
Cornette, Raphael
Locatelli, Yann
Vigne, Jean-Denis
Herrel, Anthony
Cucchi, Thomas
The mark of captivity: plastic responses in the ankle bone of a wild ungulate (Sus scrofa)
title The mark of captivity: plastic responses in the ankle bone of a wild ungulate (Sus scrofa)
title_full The mark of captivity: plastic responses in the ankle bone of a wild ungulate (Sus scrofa)
title_fullStr The mark of captivity: plastic responses in the ankle bone of a wild ungulate (Sus scrofa)
title_full_unstemmed The mark of captivity: plastic responses in the ankle bone of a wild ungulate (Sus scrofa)
title_short The mark of captivity: plastic responses in the ankle bone of a wild ungulate (Sus scrofa)
title_sort mark of captivity: plastic responses in the ankle bone of a wild ungulate (sus scrofa)
topic Organismal and Evolutionary Biology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7137979/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32269811
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.192039
work_keys_str_mv AT harbershugo themarkofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa
AT neauxdimitri themarkofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa
AT ortizkatia themarkofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa
AT blancbarbara themarkofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa
AT laurensflavie themarkofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa
AT balyisabelle themarkofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa
AT calloucecile themarkofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa
AT schafbergrenate themarkofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa
AT harudaashleigh themarkofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa
AT lecomptefrancois themarkofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa
AT casabiancafrancois themarkofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa
AT studerjacqueline themarkofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa
AT renaudsabrina themarkofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa
AT cornetteraphael themarkofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa
AT locatelliyann themarkofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa
AT vignejeandenis themarkofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa
AT herrelanthony themarkofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa
AT cucchithomas themarkofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa
AT harbershugo markofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa
AT neauxdimitri markofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa
AT ortizkatia markofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa
AT blancbarbara markofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa
AT laurensflavie markofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa
AT balyisabelle markofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa
AT calloucecile markofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa
AT schafbergrenate markofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa
AT harudaashleigh markofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa
AT lecomptefrancois markofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa
AT casabiancafrancois markofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa
AT studerjacqueline markofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa
AT renaudsabrina markofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa
AT cornetteraphael markofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa
AT locatelliyann markofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa
AT vignejeandenis markofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa
AT herrelanthony markofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa
AT cucchithomas markofcaptivityplasticresponsesintheankleboneofawildungulatesusscrofa