Cargando…

Physiological differences between advanced CrossFit athletes, recreational CrossFit participants, and physically-active adults

This investigation examined anthropometric, hormonal, and physiological differences between advanced (ADV; n = 8, 27.8 ± 4.2 years, 170 ± 11 cm, 79.8 ± 13.3 kg) and recreational (REC; n = 8, 33.5 ± 8.1 years, 172 ± 14 cm, 76.3 ± 19.5 kg) CrossFit (CF) trained participants in comparison to physically...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mangine, Gerald T., Stratton, Matthew T., Almeda, Christian G., Roberts, Michael D., Esmat, Tiffany A., VanDusseldorp, Trisha A., Feito, Yuri
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7138313/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32255792
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223548
_version_ 1783518563778166784
author Mangine, Gerald T.
Stratton, Matthew T.
Almeda, Christian G.
Roberts, Michael D.
Esmat, Tiffany A.
VanDusseldorp, Trisha A.
Feito, Yuri
author_facet Mangine, Gerald T.
Stratton, Matthew T.
Almeda, Christian G.
Roberts, Michael D.
Esmat, Tiffany A.
VanDusseldorp, Trisha A.
Feito, Yuri
author_sort Mangine, Gerald T.
collection PubMed
description This investigation examined anthropometric, hormonal, and physiological differences between advanced (ADV; n = 8, 27.8 ± 4.2 years, 170 ± 11 cm, 79.8 ± 13.3 kg) and recreational (REC; n = 8, 33.5 ± 8.1 years, 172 ± 14 cm, 76.3 ± 19.5 kg) CrossFit (CF) trained participants in comparison to physically-active controls (CON; n = 7, 27.5 ± 6.7 years, 171 ± 14 cm, 74.5 ± 14.3 kg). ADV and REC were distinguished by their past competitive success. REC and CON were resistance-trained (>2 years) and exercised on 3–5 days·wk(-1) for the past year, but CON utilized traditional resistance and cardiovascular exercise. All participants provided a fasted, resting blood sample and completed assessments of resting metabolic rate, body composition, muscle morphology, isometric mid-thigh pull strength, peak aerobic capacity, and a 3-minute maximal cycle ergometer sprint across two separate occasions (separated by 3–7 days). Blood samples were analyzed for testosterone, cortisol, and insulin-like growth factor-1. Compared to both REC and CON, one-way analysis of variance revealed ADV to possess lower body fat percentage (6.7–8.3%, p = 0.007), greater bone and non-bone lean mass (12.5–26.8%, p ≤ 0.028), muscle morphology characteristics (14.2–59.9%, p < 0.05), isometric strength characteristics (15.4–41.8%, p < 0.05), peak aerobic capacity (18.8–19.1%, p = 0.002), and 3-minute cycling performance (15.4–51.1%, p ≤ 0.023). No differences were seen between REC and CON, or between all groups for resting metabolic rate or hormone concentrations. These data suggest ADV possess several physiological advantages over REC and CON, whereas similar physiological characteristics were present in individuals who have been regularly participating in either CF or resistance and cardiovascular training for the past year.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7138313
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71383132020-04-09 Physiological differences between advanced CrossFit athletes, recreational CrossFit participants, and physically-active adults Mangine, Gerald T. Stratton, Matthew T. Almeda, Christian G. Roberts, Michael D. Esmat, Tiffany A. VanDusseldorp, Trisha A. Feito, Yuri PLoS One Research Article This investigation examined anthropometric, hormonal, and physiological differences between advanced (ADV; n = 8, 27.8 ± 4.2 years, 170 ± 11 cm, 79.8 ± 13.3 kg) and recreational (REC; n = 8, 33.5 ± 8.1 years, 172 ± 14 cm, 76.3 ± 19.5 kg) CrossFit (CF) trained participants in comparison to physically-active controls (CON; n = 7, 27.5 ± 6.7 years, 171 ± 14 cm, 74.5 ± 14.3 kg). ADV and REC were distinguished by their past competitive success. REC and CON were resistance-trained (>2 years) and exercised on 3–5 days·wk(-1) for the past year, but CON utilized traditional resistance and cardiovascular exercise. All participants provided a fasted, resting blood sample and completed assessments of resting metabolic rate, body composition, muscle morphology, isometric mid-thigh pull strength, peak aerobic capacity, and a 3-minute maximal cycle ergometer sprint across two separate occasions (separated by 3–7 days). Blood samples were analyzed for testosterone, cortisol, and insulin-like growth factor-1. Compared to both REC and CON, one-way analysis of variance revealed ADV to possess lower body fat percentage (6.7–8.3%, p = 0.007), greater bone and non-bone lean mass (12.5–26.8%, p ≤ 0.028), muscle morphology characteristics (14.2–59.9%, p < 0.05), isometric strength characteristics (15.4–41.8%, p < 0.05), peak aerobic capacity (18.8–19.1%, p = 0.002), and 3-minute cycling performance (15.4–51.1%, p ≤ 0.023). No differences were seen between REC and CON, or between all groups for resting metabolic rate or hormone concentrations. These data suggest ADV possess several physiological advantages over REC and CON, whereas similar physiological characteristics were present in individuals who have been regularly participating in either CF or resistance and cardiovascular training for the past year. Public Library of Science 2020-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7138313/ /pubmed/32255792 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223548 Text en © 2020 Mangine et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mangine, Gerald T.
Stratton, Matthew T.
Almeda, Christian G.
Roberts, Michael D.
Esmat, Tiffany A.
VanDusseldorp, Trisha A.
Feito, Yuri
Physiological differences between advanced CrossFit athletes, recreational CrossFit participants, and physically-active adults
title Physiological differences between advanced CrossFit athletes, recreational CrossFit participants, and physically-active adults
title_full Physiological differences between advanced CrossFit athletes, recreational CrossFit participants, and physically-active adults
title_fullStr Physiological differences between advanced CrossFit athletes, recreational CrossFit participants, and physically-active adults
title_full_unstemmed Physiological differences between advanced CrossFit athletes, recreational CrossFit participants, and physically-active adults
title_short Physiological differences between advanced CrossFit athletes, recreational CrossFit participants, and physically-active adults
title_sort physiological differences between advanced crossfit athletes, recreational crossfit participants, and physically-active adults
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7138313/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32255792
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223548
work_keys_str_mv AT manginegeraldt physiologicaldifferencesbetweenadvancedcrossfitathletesrecreationalcrossfitparticipantsandphysicallyactiveadults
AT strattonmatthewt physiologicaldifferencesbetweenadvancedcrossfitathletesrecreationalcrossfitparticipantsandphysicallyactiveadults
AT almedachristiang physiologicaldifferencesbetweenadvancedcrossfitathletesrecreationalcrossfitparticipantsandphysicallyactiveadults
AT robertsmichaeld physiologicaldifferencesbetweenadvancedcrossfitathletesrecreationalcrossfitparticipantsandphysicallyactiveadults
AT esmattiffanya physiologicaldifferencesbetweenadvancedcrossfitathletesrecreationalcrossfitparticipantsandphysicallyactiveadults
AT vandusseldorptrishaa physiologicaldifferencesbetweenadvancedcrossfitathletesrecreationalcrossfitparticipantsandphysicallyactiveadults
AT feitoyuri physiologicaldifferencesbetweenadvancedcrossfitathletesrecreationalcrossfitparticipantsandphysicallyactiveadults