Cargando…
Physiological differences between advanced CrossFit athletes, recreational CrossFit participants, and physically-active adults
This investigation examined anthropometric, hormonal, and physiological differences between advanced (ADV; n = 8, 27.8 ± 4.2 years, 170 ± 11 cm, 79.8 ± 13.3 kg) and recreational (REC; n = 8, 33.5 ± 8.1 years, 172 ± 14 cm, 76.3 ± 19.5 kg) CrossFit (CF) trained participants in comparison to physically...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7138313/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32255792 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223548 |
_version_ | 1783518563778166784 |
---|---|
author | Mangine, Gerald T. Stratton, Matthew T. Almeda, Christian G. Roberts, Michael D. Esmat, Tiffany A. VanDusseldorp, Trisha A. Feito, Yuri |
author_facet | Mangine, Gerald T. Stratton, Matthew T. Almeda, Christian G. Roberts, Michael D. Esmat, Tiffany A. VanDusseldorp, Trisha A. Feito, Yuri |
author_sort | Mangine, Gerald T. |
collection | PubMed |
description | This investigation examined anthropometric, hormonal, and physiological differences between advanced (ADV; n = 8, 27.8 ± 4.2 years, 170 ± 11 cm, 79.8 ± 13.3 kg) and recreational (REC; n = 8, 33.5 ± 8.1 years, 172 ± 14 cm, 76.3 ± 19.5 kg) CrossFit (CF) trained participants in comparison to physically-active controls (CON; n = 7, 27.5 ± 6.7 years, 171 ± 14 cm, 74.5 ± 14.3 kg). ADV and REC were distinguished by their past competitive success. REC and CON were resistance-trained (>2 years) and exercised on 3–5 days·wk(-1) for the past year, but CON utilized traditional resistance and cardiovascular exercise. All participants provided a fasted, resting blood sample and completed assessments of resting metabolic rate, body composition, muscle morphology, isometric mid-thigh pull strength, peak aerobic capacity, and a 3-minute maximal cycle ergometer sprint across two separate occasions (separated by 3–7 days). Blood samples were analyzed for testosterone, cortisol, and insulin-like growth factor-1. Compared to both REC and CON, one-way analysis of variance revealed ADV to possess lower body fat percentage (6.7–8.3%, p = 0.007), greater bone and non-bone lean mass (12.5–26.8%, p ≤ 0.028), muscle morphology characteristics (14.2–59.9%, p < 0.05), isometric strength characteristics (15.4–41.8%, p < 0.05), peak aerobic capacity (18.8–19.1%, p = 0.002), and 3-minute cycling performance (15.4–51.1%, p ≤ 0.023). No differences were seen between REC and CON, or between all groups for resting metabolic rate or hormone concentrations. These data suggest ADV possess several physiological advantages over REC and CON, whereas similar physiological characteristics were present in individuals who have been regularly participating in either CF or resistance and cardiovascular training for the past year. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7138313 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71383132020-04-09 Physiological differences between advanced CrossFit athletes, recreational CrossFit participants, and physically-active adults Mangine, Gerald T. Stratton, Matthew T. Almeda, Christian G. Roberts, Michael D. Esmat, Tiffany A. VanDusseldorp, Trisha A. Feito, Yuri PLoS One Research Article This investigation examined anthropometric, hormonal, and physiological differences between advanced (ADV; n = 8, 27.8 ± 4.2 years, 170 ± 11 cm, 79.8 ± 13.3 kg) and recreational (REC; n = 8, 33.5 ± 8.1 years, 172 ± 14 cm, 76.3 ± 19.5 kg) CrossFit (CF) trained participants in comparison to physically-active controls (CON; n = 7, 27.5 ± 6.7 years, 171 ± 14 cm, 74.5 ± 14.3 kg). ADV and REC were distinguished by their past competitive success. REC and CON were resistance-trained (>2 years) and exercised on 3–5 days·wk(-1) for the past year, but CON utilized traditional resistance and cardiovascular exercise. All participants provided a fasted, resting blood sample and completed assessments of resting metabolic rate, body composition, muscle morphology, isometric mid-thigh pull strength, peak aerobic capacity, and a 3-minute maximal cycle ergometer sprint across two separate occasions (separated by 3–7 days). Blood samples were analyzed for testosterone, cortisol, and insulin-like growth factor-1. Compared to both REC and CON, one-way analysis of variance revealed ADV to possess lower body fat percentage (6.7–8.3%, p = 0.007), greater bone and non-bone lean mass (12.5–26.8%, p ≤ 0.028), muscle morphology characteristics (14.2–59.9%, p < 0.05), isometric strength characteristics (15.4–41.8%, p < 0.05), peak aerobic capacity (18.8–19.1%, p = 0.002), and 3-minute cycling performance (15.4–51.1%, p ≤ 0.023). No differences were seen between REC and CON, or between all groups for resting metabolic rate or hormone concentrations. These data suggest ADV possess several physiological advantages over REC and CON, whereas similar physiological characteristics were present in individuals who have been regularly participating in either CF or resistance and cardiovascular training for the past year. Public Library of Science 2020-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7138313/ /pubmed/32255792 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223548 Text en © 2020 Mangine et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Mangine, Gerald T. Stratton, Matthew T. Almeda, Christian G. Roberts, Michael D. Esmat, Tiffany A. VanDusseldorp, Trisha A. Feito, Yuri Physiological differences between advanced CrossFit athletes, recreational CrossFit participants, and physically-active adults |
title | Physiological differences between advanced CrossFit athletes, recreational CrossFit participants, and physically-active adults |
title_full | Physiological differences between advanced CrossFit athletes, recreational CrossFit participants, and physically-active adults |
title_fullStr | Physiological differences between advanced CrossFit athletes, recreational CrossFit participants, and physically-active adults |
title_full_unstemmed | Physiological differences between advanced CrossFit athletes, recreational CrossFit participants, and physically-active adults |
title_short | Physiological differences between advanced CrossFit athletes, recreational CrossFit participants, and physically-active adults |
title_sort | physiological differences between advanced crossfit athletes, recreational crossfit participants, and physically-active adults |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7138313/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32255792 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223548 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT manginegeraldt physiologicaldifferencesbetweenadvancedcrossfitathletesrecreationalcrossfitparticipantsandphysicallyactiveadults AT strattonmatthewt physiologicaldifferencesbetweenadvancedcrossfitathletesrecreationalcrossfitparticipantsandphysicallyactiveadults AT almedachristiang physiologicaldifferencesbetweenadvancedcrossfitathletesrecreationalcrossfitparticipantsandphysicallyactiveadults AT robertsmichaeld physiologicaldifferencesbetweenadvancedcrossfitathletesrecreationalcrossfitparticipantsandphysicallyactiveadults AT esmattiffanya physiologicaldifferencesbetweenadvancedcrossfitathletesrecreationalcrossfitparticipantsandphysicallyactiveadults AT vandusseldorptrishaa physiologicaldifferencesbetweenadvancedcrossfitathletesrecreationalcrossfitparticipantsandphysicallyactiveadults AT feitoyuri physiologicaldifferencesbetweenadvancedcrossfitathletesrecreationalcrossfitparticipantsandphysicallyactiveadults |