Cargando…
Efficacy and safety of recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer
To compare the ovarian responses after administration of two recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (r-FSH) preparations under gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogue downregulation, we conducted a phase 3, randomized, multicenter, assessor-blind, active-controlled, parallel group study. Th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Impact Journals
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7138541/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32209728 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/aging.102919 |
_version_ | 1783518590308188160 |
---|---|
author | Hu, Linli Zhang, Songying Quan, Song Lv, Jieqiang Qian, Weiping Huang, Yuanhua Lu, Weiying Sun, Yingpu |
author_facet | Hu, Linli Zhang, Songying Quan, Song Lv, Jieqiang Qian, Weiping Huang, Yuanhua Lu, Weiying Sun, Yingpu |
author_sort | Hu, Linli |
collection | PubMed |
description | To compare the ovarian responses after administration of two recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (r-FSH) preparations under gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogue downregulation, we conducted a phase 3, randomized, multicenter, assessor-blind, active-controlled, parallel group study. The primary outcome was the number of oocytes retrieved. The secondary outcomes included total dose and duration of r-FSH administered, oocyte quality, blood estradiol levels, follicular development, fertilization rates, implantation rates, and pregnancy rates (biochemical, clinical, and ongoing). A total of 451 patients with infertility were randomized to receive either Follitrope™ Prefilled Syringe or Gonal-F(®) Pen for ovarian stimulation. The mean number of oocytes retrieved was 14.9 in the Follitrope(TM) Prefilled Syringe group, and 12.8 in the Gonal-F(®) Pen group. The 95% confidence interval in the oocyte number difference between the groups was [–0.1, 4.2], demonstrating that Follitrope(TM) Prefilled Syringe was not inferior to Gonal-F(®) Pen. The clinical pregnancy rates (Follitrope(TM) Prefilled Syringe vs. Gonal-F(®) Pen: 55.4% vs. 51.9%) and ongoing pregnancy rates (44.1% vs. 43.0%) were similar between the groups. No clinically significant adverse events were observed in either group. In summary, our study indicates that Follitrope(TM) Prefilled Syringe is safe and efficacious for ovarian stimulation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7138541 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Impact Journals |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71385412020-04-13 Efficacy and safety of recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer Hu, Linli Zhang, Songying Quan, Song Lv, Jieqiang Qian, Weiping Huang, Yuanhua Lu, Weiying Sun, Yingpu Aging (Albany NY) Research Paper To compare the ovarian responses after administration of two recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (r-FSH) preparations under gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogue downregulation, we conducted a phase 3, randomized, multicenter, assessor-blind, active-controlled, parallel group study. The primary outcome was the number of oocytes retrieved. The secondary outcomes included total dose and duration of r-FSH administered, oocyte quality, blood estradiol levels, follicular development, fertilization rates, implantation rates, and pregnancy rates (biochemical, clinical, and ongoing). A total of 451 patients with infertility were randomized to receive either Follitrope™ Prefilled Syringe or Gonal-F(®) Pen for ovarian stimulation. The mean number of oocytes retrieved was 14.9 in the Follitrope(TM) Prefilled Syringe group, and 12.8 in the Gonal-F(®) Pen group. The 95% confidence interval in the oocyte number difference between the groups was [–0.1, 4.2], demonstrating that Follitrope(TM) Prefilled Syringe was not inferior to Gonal-F(®) Pen. The clinical pregnancy rates (Follitrope(TM) Prefilled Syringe vs. Gonal-F(®) Pen: 55.4% vs. 51.9%) and ongoing pregnancy rates (44.1% vs. 43.0%) were similar between the groups. No clinically significant adverse events were observed in either group. In summary, our study indicates that Follitrope(TM) Prefilled Syringe is safe and efficacious for ovarian stimulation. Impact Journals 2020-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7138541/ /pubmed/32209728 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/aging.102919 Text en Copyright © 2020 Hu et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Hu, Linli Zhang, Songying Quan, Song Lv, Jieqiang Qian, Weiping Huang, Yuanhua Lu, Weiying Sun, Yingpu Efficacy and safety of recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer |
title | Efficacy and safety of recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer |
title_full | Efficacy and safety of recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer |
title_fullStr | Efficacy and safety of recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy and safety of recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer |
title_short | Efficacy and safety of recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer |
title_sort | efficacy and safety of recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7138541/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32209728 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/aging.102919 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hulinli efficacyandsafetyofrecombinanthumanfolliclestimulatinghormoneinpatientsundergoinginvitrofertilizationembryotransfer AT zhangsongying efficacyandsafetyofrecombinanthumanfolliclestimulatinghormoneinpatientsundergoinginvitrofertilizationembryotransfer AT quansong efficacyandsafetyofrecombinanthumanfolliclestimulatinghormoneinpatientsundergoinginvitrofertilizationembryotransfer AT lvjieqiang efficacyandsafetyofrecombinanthumanfolliclestimulatinghormoneinpatientsundergoinginvitrofertilizationembryotransfer AT qianweiping efficacyandsafetyofrecombinanthumanfolliclestimulatinghormoneinpatientsundergoinginvitrofertilizationembryotransfer AT huangyuanhua efficacyandsafetyofrecombinanthumanfolliclestimulatinghormoneinpatientsundergoinginvitrofertilizationembryotransfer AT luweiying efficacyandsafetyofrecombinanthumanfolliclestimulatinghormoneinpatientsundergoinginvitrofertilizationembryotransfer AT sunyingpu efficacyandsafetyofrecombinanthumanfolliclestimulatinghormoneinpatientsundergoinginvitrofertilizationembryotransfer |