Cargando…

Efficacy and safety of recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer

To compare the ovarian responses after administration of two recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (r-FSH) preparations under gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogue downregulation, we conducted a phase 3, randomized, multicenter, assessor-blind, active-controlled, parallel group study. Th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hu, Linli, Zhang, Songying, Quan, Song, Lv, Jieqiang, Qian, Weiping, Huang, Yuanhua, Lu, Weiying, Sun, Yingpu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Impact Journals 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7138541/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32209728
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/aging.102919
_version_ 1783518590308188160
author Hu, Linli
Zhang, Songying
Quan, Song
Lv, Jieqiang
Qian, Weiping
Huang, Yuanhua
Lu, Weiying
Sun, Yingpu
author_facet Hu, Linli
Zhang, Songying
Quan, Song
Lv, Jieqiang
Qian, Weiping
Huang, Yuanhua
Lu, Weiying
Sun, Yingpu
author_sort Hu, Linli
collection PubMed
description To compare the ovarian responses after administration of two recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (r-FSH) preparations under gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogue downregulation, we conducted a phase 3, randomized, multicenter, assessor-blind, active-controlled, parallel group study. The primary outcome was the number of oocytes retrieved. The secondary outcomes included total dose and duration of r-FSH administered, oocyte quality, blood estradiol levels, follicular development, fertilization rates, implantation rates, and pregnancy rates (biochemical, clinical, and ongoing). A total of 451 patients with infertility were randomized to receive either Follitrope™ Prefilled Syringe or Gonal-F(®) Pen for ovarian stimulation. The mean number of oocytes retrieved was 14.9 in the Follitrope(TM) Prefilled Syringe group, and 12.8 in the Gonal-F(®) Pen group. The 95% confidence interval in the oocyte number difference between the groups was [–0.1, 4.2], demonstrating that Follitrope(TM) Prefilled Syringe was not inferior to Gonal-F(®) Pen. The clinical pregnancy rates (Follitrope(TM) Prefilled Syringe vs. Gonal-F(®) Pen: 55.4% vs. 51.9%) and ongoing pregnancy rates (44.1% vs. 43.0%) were similar between the groups. No clinically significant adverse events were observed in either group. In summary, our study indicates that Follitrope(TM) Prefilled Syringe is safe and efficacious for ovarian stimulation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7138541
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Impact Journals
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71385412020-04-13 Efficacy and safety of recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer Hu, Linli Zhang, Songying Quan, Song Lv, Jieqiang Qian, Weiping Huang, Yuanhua Lu, Weiying Sun, Yingpu Aging (Albany NY) Research Paper To compare the ovarian responses after administration of two recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (r-FSH) preparations under gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogue downregulation, we conducted a phase 3, randomized, multicenter, assessor-blind, active-controlled, parallel group study. The primary outcome was the number of oocytes retrieved. The secondary outcomes included total dose and duration of r-FSH administered, oocyte quality, blood estradiol levels, follicular development, fertilization rates, implantation rates, and pregnancy rates (biochemical, clinical, and ongoing). A total of 451 patients with infertility were randomized to receive either Follitrope™ Prefilled Syringe or Gonal-F(®) Pen for ovarian stimulation. The mean number of oocytes retrieved was 14.9 in the Follitrope(TM) Prefilled Syringe group, and 12.8 in the Gonal-F(®) Pen group. The 95% confidence interval in the oocyte number difference between the groups was [–0.1, 4.2], demonstrating that Follitrope(TM) Prefilled Syringe was not inferior to Gonal-F(®) Pen. The clinical pregnancy rates (Follitrope(TM) Prefilled Syringe vs. Gonal-F(®) Pen: 55.4% vs. 51.9%) and ongoing pregnancy rates (44.1% vs. 43.0%) were similar between the groups. No clinically significant adverse events were observed in either group. In summary, our study indicates that Follitrope(TM) Prefilled Syringe is safe and efficacious for ovarian stimulation. Impact Journals 2020-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7138541/ /pubmed/32209728 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/aging.102919 Text en Copyright © 2020 Hu et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Hu, Linli
Zhang, Songying
Quan, Song
Lv, Jieqiang
Qian, Weiping
Huang, Yuanhua
Lu, Weiying
Sun, Yingpu
Efficacy and safety of recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer
title Efficacy and safety of recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer
title_full Efficacy and safety of recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer
title_short Efficacy and safety of recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer
title_sort efficacy and safety of recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7138541/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32209728
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/aging.102919
work_keys_str_mv AT hulinli efficacyandsafetyofrecombinanthumanfolliclestimulatinghormoneinpatientsundergoinginvitrofertilizationembryotransfer
AT zhangsongying efficacyandsafetyofrecombinanthumanfolliclestimulatinghormoneinpatientsundergoinginvitrofertilizationembryotransfer
AT quansong efficacyandsafetyofrecombinanthumanfolliclestimulatinghormoneinpatientsundergoinginvitrofertilizationembryotransfer
AT lvjieqiang efficacyandsafetyofrecombinanthumanfolliclestimulatinghormoneinpatientsundergoinginvitrofertilizationembryotransfer
AT qianweiping efficacyandsafetyofrecombinanthumanfolliclestimulatinghormoneinpatientsundergoinginvitrofertilizationembryotransfer
AT huangyuanhua efficacyandsafetyofrecombinanthumanfolliclestimulatinghormoneinpatientsundergoinginvitrofertilizationembryotransfer
AT luweiying efficacyandsafetyofrecombinanthumanfolliclestimulatinghormoneinpatientsundergoinginvitrofertilizationembryotransfer
AT sunyingpu efficacyandsafetyofrecombinanthumanfolliclestimulatinghormoneinpatientsundergoinginvitrofertilizationembryotransfer